The revelation in The Washington Post, of a tape of Donald Trump bragging about sexually assaulting women, landed just after 4 p.m. on Oct. 7, 2016.
Less than an hour later, WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy organization founded by Julian Assange, began releasing hacked emails from the account of John Podesta, the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.
The striking simultaneity fulfilled the hope of Trump confidant Roger Stone, according to Jerome Corsi, a conservative author and former Stone associate who was subpoenaed in summer for questioning by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III.
Corsi will turn out to be a key witness...
What's important to note about the matter of Roger Stone's having been indicted is that unlike the other Trump-orbit individuals who've also been charged with lying about "this and that" related to their words and deeds in service of Trump, Trump, so far, has not denigrated, discounted or distanced himself from Stone.
I don’t know about Corsi being a good witness for either team. I have seen a few of his interviews, (seems to be a regular on the Melber show,) his remarks are hard to stitch into coherent thoughts.
Take what Corsi says with a grain of salt, but he's been angling to cooperate with Mueller and he wants to testify against Trump/Stone...
Roger Stone wanted WikiLeaks dump to distract from ‘Access Hollywood’ tape, says Mueller witness
:lamo
Man you'd better go change your undies after experiencing such an orgasmic fantasy.
Stone will walk. And Meuller is in for a bit of a rude awakening me thinks.
Gee...this is gonna curtail your sex life.
Sorry 'bout that Chief.
He did say that Stone barely worked for him. Stone got out early from the campaign but still did stuff in the background and likely organizes Trumps entire media strategy through official campaign proxies.
Why do you keep talking about rude awakenings and sexual fantasies? Do you want to bang Roger Stone's wife? I hear he's into that sorta thing.
What's important to note about the matter of Roger Stone's having been indicted is that unlike the other Trump-orbit individuals who've also been charged with lying about "this and that" related to their words and deeds in service of Trump, Trump, so far, has not denigrated, discounted or distanced himself from Stone.
Why do you keep talking about rude awakenings and sexual fantasies? Do you want to bang Roger Stone's wife? I hear he's into that sorta thing.
No. I have my own wife, thank you very much.
Besides...I'm not sure you've noticed...but I'm not a fan of sexual deviants.
Besides...I'm not sure you've noticed...but I'm not a fan of sexual deviants.
Really you are a cultist so your loyalties prove otherwise...
Staging the release of the stolen emails to interfere in the 2016 election.The object of the conspiracy was to hack into the computers of U.S. persons and entities involved in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, steal documents from those computers, and stage releases of the stolen documents to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
In your book, you say Roger Stone contacted you before the release of that "Access Hollywood" tape, the one with Billy Bush, and asked you to try to get word to Assange, release John Podesta's e-mails, so -- to change the news cycle.
Now, you write in your book; "I believe I told the daily World Net Daily news team conference call that the Billy Bush tape was coming. I'm sure I asked that if anybody had a way to reach Assange, we should pass the alert to Assange, so he could begin dropping the Podesta file right away."
As we know, on October 7, WikiLeaks did release those e-mails just half-an-hour after "The Washington Post" published the "Access Hollywood" story.
Do you take credit for that? Do you think what you said on that conference call got word to Assange?
.....
And it's my recollection that Roger mentioned that this Billy Bush was coming, and he wanted to know if Assange could begin dropping e-mails. Now, Roger may have a different recollection of that. I'm not disputing what Roger's recollection is.
You e-mailed Roger Stone to say you -- quote -- "should be given credit," according to an e-mail the prosecutors have.
Why would you say that if you don't think you deserved credit for the timing of the WikiLeaks dump right after the "Access Hollywood" tape?
He did say that Stone barely worked for him. Stone got out early from the campaign but still did stuff in the background and likely organizes Trumps entire media strategy through official campaign proxies.
I support common sense and nationalism.!:lamo :lamo :lamo :lamo
Then you really shouldn't be supporting Trump or Stone for that matter.
I support common sense and nationalism.!
You seem to support open borders and fascism.!
It's rare that I'm accused of something that I'm not guilty of.
-- Roger Stone
Red:
As goes the Trump campaign's payroll, that's true.
Would an audit of the Trump Organization entities reveal Stone was by one or more of them paid for political consulting services?
- 2015 - Roger Stone Leaves [Trump] Campaign
- 2019 - Did Roger Stone Jump, or Was He Pushed From Donald Trump’s Campaign?
Might there be an "Essential-Consulting-esque" firm created to make payments to Stone? I don't know. I know only that creating shell firms for the purpose of obfuscating Trump's connection to transfers of money and the effectuation of agreements isn't beneath Trump.
Has Mueller examined 1099 filings and other elements of the pecuniary trail of "bread crumbs" that may lead to such a finding? I don't know. I know that's information to which the public cannot obtain access, whereas Mueller can.
Blue:
It strains credulity to think otherwise insofar as the 2016 run was the second time Stone partnered with Trump in a bid for the WH.
You support a guy who wants black guys to bang his wife (who also said he likes men) and another guy who bangs pornstars while his third wife is pregnant and was accused of rape and sexual assault multiple times. That's not common sense...
Mueller has receipts. Some are saying flipping Stone is useless and he is dead in the water due to evidence Mueller has against him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?