• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Roger Stone wanted WikiLeaks dump to distract from ‘Access Hollywood’ tape, says Mueller witness

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Take what Corsi says with a grain of salt, but he's been angling to cooperate with Mueller and he wants to testify against Trump/Stone...

The revelation in The Washington Post, of a tape of Donald Trump bragging about sexually assaulting women, landed just after 4 p.m. on Oct. 7, 2016.
Less than an hour later, WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy organization founded by Julian Assange, began releasing hacked emails from the account of John Podesta, the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.

The striking simultaneity fulfilled the hope of Trump confidant Roger Stone, according to Jerome Corsi, a conservative author and former Stone associate who was subpoenaed in summer for questioning by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III.

Roger Stone wanted WikiLeaks dump to distract from ‘Access Hollywood’ tape, says Mueller witness
 
Corsi will turn out to be a key witness, he seemed to not like dealing with stone repeatedly told him to forget his name a d refused to lie to congress even after stone threatened his life.

Lime trump stone made a enemy out of an ally...
 
Last edited:
So when. Trump and stone are sharing a cell, I would love to be a fly on the wall listening to the negotiations on who will be the top and who will be the bottom...
 
So when. Trump and stone are sharing a cell, I would love to be a fly on the wall listening to the negotiations on who will be the top and who will be the bottom...

Too bad Milo can't join them. They look chummy.
milo.jpg
 
I don’t know about Corsi being a good witness for either team. I have seen a few of his interviews, (seems to be a regular on the Melber show,) his remarks are hard to stitch into coherent thoughts.
 
What's important to note about the matter of Roger Stone's having been indicted is that unlike the other Trump-orbit individuals who've also been charged with lying about "this and that" related to their words and deeds in service of Trump, Trump, so far, has not denigrated, discounted or distanced himself from Stone.
 
What's important to note about the matter of Roger Stone's having been indicted is that unlike the other Trump-orbit individuals who've also been charged with lying about "this and that" related to their words and deeds in service of Trump, Trump, so far, has not denigrated, discounted or distanced himself from Stone.

He did say that Stone barely worked for him. Stone got out early from the campaign but still did stuff in the background and likely organizes Trumps entire media strategy through official campaign proxies.
 
I don’t know about Corsi being a good witness for either team. I have seen a few of his interviews, (seems to be a regular on the Melber show,) his remarks are hard to stitch into coherent thoughts.

This one seems to be the exception.
 
Take what Corsi says with a grain of salt, but he's been angling to cooperate with Mueller and he wants to testify against Trump/Stone...



Roger Stone wanted WikiLeaks dump to distract from ‘Access Hollywood’ tape, says Mueller witness

:lamo
Man you'd better go change your undies after experiencing such an orgasmic fantasy.

Stone will walk. And Meuller is in for a bit of a rude awakening me thinks.

Gee...this is gonna curtail your sex life.
Sorry 'bout that Chief.
 
:lamo
Man you'd better go change your undies after experiencing such an orgasmic fantasy.

Stone will walk. And Meuller is in for a bit of a rude awakening me thinks.

Gee...this is gonna curtail your sex life.
Sorry 'bout that Chief.

Why do you keep talking about rude awakenings and sexual fantasies? Do you want to bang Roger Stone's wife? I hear he's into that sorta thing.
 
He did say that Stone barely worked for him. Stone got out early from the campaign but still did stuff in the background and likely organizes Trumps entire media strategy through official campaign proxies.

That is because stone was going to be dirty work, so he could not be an on paper member of the election, be never stopped working for them, just put a little distance for the purpose of plausible deniability...
 
Why do you keep talking about rude awakenings and sexual fantasies? Do you want to bang Roger Stone's wife? I hear he's into that sorta thing.

No. I have my own wife, thank you very much.
Besides...I'm not sure you've noticed...but I'm not a fan of sexual deviants.
 
What's important to note about the matter of Roger Stone's having been indicted is that unlike the other Trump-orbit individuals who've also been charged with lying about "this and that" related to their words and deeds in service of Trump, Trump, so far, has not denigrated, discounted or distanced himself from Stone.

Trump has definitely distanced himself from Stone and has refrained from commenting on him.
 
Why do you keep talking about rude awakenings and sexual fantasies? Do you want to bang Roger Stone's wife? I hear he's into that sorta thing.

I wonder if Stones cell mate will be turned on by that Nixon tat on his back as he looks down upon it each day?
 
No. I have my own wife, thank you very much.
Besides...I'm not sure you've noticed...but I'm not a fan of sexual deviants.

Really you are a cultist so your loyalties prove otherwise...
 
Besides...I'm not sure you've noticed...but I'm not a fan of sexual deviants.

:lamo :lamo :lamo :lamo

Then you really shouldn't be supporting Trump or Stone for that matter.
 
I posted this last night in another thread.
From the Russian Hacking indictment, establishing one of the conspiracies against the United States
The object of the conspiracy was to hack into the computers of U.S. persons and entities involved in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, steal documents from those computers, and stage releases of the stolen documents to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Staging the release of the stolen emails to interfere in the 2016 election.

Corsi said he'll testify to the below:
In your book, you say Roger Stone contacted you before the release of that "Access Hollywood" tape, the one with Billy Bush, and asked you to try to get word to Assange, release John Podesta's e-mails, so -- to change the news cycle.
Now, you write in your book; "I believe I told the daily World Net Daily news team conference call that the Billy Bush tape was coming. I'm sure I asked that if anybody had a way to reach Assange, we should pass the alert to Assange, so he could begin dropping the Podesta file right away."

As we know, on October 7, WikiLeaks did release those e-mails just half-an-hour after "The Washington Post" published the "Access Hollywood" story.
Do you take credit for that? Do you think what you said on that conference call got word to Assange?
.....
And it's my recollection that Roger mentioned that this Billy Bush was coming, and he wanted to know if Assange could begin dropping e-mails. Now, Roger may have a different recollection of that. I'm not disputing what Roger's recollection is.

You e-mailed Roger Stone to say you -- quote -- "should be given credit," according to an e-mail the prosecutors have.
Why would you say that if you don't think you deserved credit for the timing of the WikiLeaks dump right after the "Access Hollywood" tape?

Sure looks like Trump's campaign advisor (and maybe Corsi) was trying is hardest to help with the email timing, as part of that conspiracy? Not sure if they can conclusively link them, but it's obvious they tried.
 
He did say that Stone barely worked for him. Stone got out early from the campaign but still did stuff in the background and likely organizes Trumps entire media strategy through official campaign proxies.
It's rare that I'm accused of something that I'm not guilty of.
-- Roger Stone


Red:
As goes the Trump campaign's payroll, that's true.
Would an audit of the Trump Organization entities reveal Stone was by one or more of them paid for political consulting services?

Might there be an "Essential-Consulting-esque" firm created to make payments to Stone? I don't know. I know only that creating shell firms for the purpose of obfuscating Trump's connection to transfers of money and the effectuation of agreements isn't beneath Trump.

Has Mueller examined 1099 filings and other elements of the pecuniary trail of "bread crumbs" that may lead to such a finding? I don't know. I know that's information to which the public cannot obtain access, whereas Mueller can.


Blue:
It strains credulity to think otherwise insofar as the 2016 run was the second time Stone partnered with Trump in a bid for the WH.
 
:lamo :lamo :lamo :lamo

Then you really shouldn't be supporting Trump or Stone for that matter.
I support common sense and nationalism.!
You seem to support open borders and fascism.!
 
I support common sense and nationalism.!
You seem to support open borders and fascism.!

You support a guy who wants black guys to bang his wife (who also said he likes men) and another guy who bangs pornstars while his third wife is pregnant and was accused of rape and sexual assault multiple times. That's not common sense...
 
It's rare that I'm accused of something that I'm not guilty of.
-- Roger Stone


Red:
As goes the Trump campaign's payroll, that's true.
Would an audit of the Trump Organization entities reveal Stone was by one or more of them paid for political consulting services?

Might there be an "Essential-Consulting-esque" firm created to make payments to Stone? I don't know. I know only that creating shell firms for the purpose of obfuscating Trump's connection to transfers of money and the effectuation of agreements isn't beneath Trump.

Has Mueller examined 1099 filings and other elements of the pecuniary trail of "bread crumbs" that may lead to such a finding? I don't know. I know that's information to which the public cannot obtain access, whereas Mueller can.


Blue:
It strains credulity to think otherwise insofar as the 2016 run was the second time Stone partnered with Trump in a bid for the WH.

Mueller has receipts. Some are saying flipping Stone is useless and he is dead in the water due to evidence Mueller has against him.
 
You support a guy who wants black guys to bang his wife (who also said he likes men) and another guy who bangs pornstars while his third wife is pregnant and was accused of rape and sexual assault multiple times. That's not common sense...

:lamo
Oh please give your faux moral outrage a rest.
Humans do all sorts of strange things sexually. I didn't care when Billy-Boy did it, and I don't care all that much now.
For instance...I don't really care that you cream your jeans every time an article comes out that paints a bleak picture for Trump.
I find it odd...but really I care that you might go out in public with cum-filled undies, and embarrass yourself.

More than usual I mean...
 
Mueller has receipts. Some are saying flipping Stone is useless and he is dead in the water due to evidence Mueller has against him.

It also makes me wonder why Corsi wasn't indicted. Perhaps they are allowing him to remain "pure" in the dark and souless eyes of Trump supporters...they can't levy the "but he's a proven lair!!" nonsense they have at all of the other flipped felons.
Corsi can then, like a bipedal Jaba the Hut, blubber and stutter his way into testifying without the baggage of being an "admitted liar!!".
 
Back
Top Bottom