• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

RNC getting nervous as 1/6 committee looks at its complicity with Trump in deliberately spreading misinformation

Airyaman said:
Um, I said "supposedly". Trump was spreading disinformation. Even his AG admitted that.
Click to expand...
Sorry, that hasn't been proven yet. Not even the House is ready to call for indictments. The current AG hasn't taken any action.

And I don't give a rat's ass what Barr has to say. He lost what remaining credibility he had when he refused to investigate election fraud.
 
US&THEM said:
Zero evidence but yea you keep on waiting for the election fraud.
Click to expand...
Deflection.

But hey...if the House...or the DOJ...has something, someone should indict, don't you think?
 
Mycroft said:
Deflection.

But hey...if the House...or the DOJ...has something, someone should indict, don't you think?
Click to expand...
That’s your go to. The information that has come out of Jan 6 is embarrassing. Trump and his stooges have shown they are incapable to accomplish anything of value.
You want to meet at the Four Seasons?
 
US&THEM said:
That’s your go to. The information that has come out of Jan 6 is embarrassing. Trump and his stooges have shown they are incapable to accomplish anything of value.
You want to meet at the Four Seasons?
Click to expand...
Ahhh...there you are: Embarrassing.

That's what this dog and pony show is all about: Finding something embarrassing.

It has nothing to do with legal/not legal...nothing to do with crime/no crime. It's all about the narrative.
 
Mycroft said:
Ahhh...there you are: Embarrassing.

That's what this dog and pony show is all about: Finding something embarrassing.

It has nothing to do with legal/not legal...nothing to do with crime/no crime. It's all about the narrative.
Click to expand...
Stop the steal
 
Mycroft said:
Deflection.

But hey...if the House...or the DOJ...has something, someone should indict, don't you think?
Click to expand...
What do you believe to be the acceptable timeline for an investigation? How many lawsuits is acceptable in order to block and/or prolong the investigation?
 
Mycroft said:
Ahhh...there you are: Embarrassing.

That's what this dog and pony show is all about: Finding something embarrassing.

It has nothing to do with legal/not legal...nothing to do with crime/no crime. It's all about the narrative.
Click to expand...
Read the emails and text amongst the Trump boob squad. Rudy and Bernie K running around spreading their bs and crying to the RNC for payment. It’s all out there.
 
US&THEM said:
What do you believe to be the acceptable timeline for an investigation? How many lawsuits is acceptable in order to block and/or prolong the investigation?
Click to expand...
For the House dog and pony show? As many lawsuits as can be mounted. Since the House is doing this for the narrative, anything that diminishes that narrative is a good thing.

For the DOJ? Who is mounting lawsuits against them? Hell, WHAT is the DOJ investigating?
 
Mycroft said:
For the House dog and pony show? As many lawsuits as can be mounted. Since the House is doing this for the narrative, anything that diminishes that narrative is a good thing.

For the DOJ? Who is mounting lawsuits against them? Hell, WHAT is the DOJ investigating?
Click to expand...
Here you go again.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Why is everyone on the GOP side a target of the Jan 6 investigation but not Nancy Pelosi who was one of the principles in charge of the Capital police and is bound to have information pertaining to their preparedness?
Click to expand...

You did already know that Mitch McConnell was on the same committee as Pelosi, and both of them signed off on the same records, including how they both signed off on the document where they declined additional help on Jan 6 ? Why would you say it's Pelosi's fault without naming McConnell?
 
Mycroft said:
Sorry, that hasn't been proven yet. Not even the House is ready to call for indictments. The current AG hasn't taken any action.

And I don't give a rat's ass what Barr has to say. He lost what remaining credibility he had when he refused to investigate election fraud.
Click to expand...

It's a fact that Will Barr issued a directive allowing federal prosecutors more leeway to widen voter fraud investigations on November 9, 2020. Some people argued at the time that he allowed too much leeway, but that's an opinion. I don't think it's accurate to say he refused to investigate. I would say he sent out a directive to tell his prosecutors to go get the evidence. That's not a refusal.
 
ultmd said:
At this point, honestly.....who still has serious doubts that there were dozens and dozens of high profile GOPers directly (or indirectly) involved in the failed coup attempt of Jan 6, 2021?

Elected members of Congress.....elected members of state legislatures.....appointed members of Trump's administration.....Trump's family......Trump himself......multiple members of FoxNews' primetime and daytime lineups.......prominent ultra-wealthy conservatives.......etc. etc. etc.

I doubt that AG Garland has the stones to do what needs to be done, but I am certainly praying that he will.

Anyone/everyone who was even remotely involved in the attack on the Capital needs to face some kind of legal judgment. The more powerful/influential they are, the more important it is that they face consequences.

If not, they will be back to try again the very next time their side loses the White House and/or Congress.
Click to expand...
1647022445971.png​
 
Another thread blaming Trump for everything.

So liberal media = 100% true
Conservative media/Trump = 100% false

Then blame it all on Trump and his supporters and supporters of America and the Constitution. Seems confusing?

Is the MSM goal to conquer and divide? Seems like that would be treason?
 
soap box said:
It's a fact that Will Barr issued a directive allowing federal prosecutors more leeway to widen voter fraud investigations on November 9, 2020. Some people argued at the time that he allowed too much leeway, but that's an opinion. I don't think it's accurate to say he refused to investigate. I would say he sent out a directive to tell his prosecutors to go get the evidence. That's not a refusal.
Click to expand...
The ones who found evidence...he told them to stop.
 
pocket aces said:
What an anti American statement.
Click to expand...
Fighting against abuse of power is very American. Sorry you'd prefer so kind of anti-American socialist hellhole.
 
Kreton said:
You don't seem to mind when Trump and other traitors do it. Why the double standard?
Click to expand...
Sorry, you'll have to be more specific.
 
soap box said:
I can cite my claim,
www.forbes.com

Barr Says Voter Fraud Investigations Can Go Forward — If They’re Credible

The unusual step comes after President Donald Trump offers up apoplectic, evidence-free conspiracy theories about voter fraud.
www.forbes.com www.forbes.com


can you cite yours?
Click to expand...
Yes.

thepalmierireport.com

Private Investigator Claims AG Barr Told Him To Stop Investigating Election Fraud - ThePalmieriReport

Private Investigator: AG Barr Told Me To Stop Investigating Election Fraud
thepalmierireport.com thepalmierireport.com
 
Mycroft said:
Sorry, that hasn't been proven yet. Not even the House is ready to call for indictments. The current AG hasn't taken any action.

And I don't give a rat's ass what Barr has to say. He lost what remaining credibility he had when he refused to investigate election fraud.
Click to expand...
bbm: Barr did in fact gave a directive to investigate election fraud. There was no massive voter fraud found and when he tried to make the former guy understand that; the former guy got angry and Barr *resigned or the former guy asked for his resignation; depending on what version you choose to believe*
1647027195107.png1647027238336.png

DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org www.documentcloud.org

Loading…

s3.documentcloud.org
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom