• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

RFK Jr. says the CDC buried its own internal study which found a 1135% INCREASE in Autism risk from Hepatitis B Vaccine

What should be done with chronically sick kids?

Start off with not exposing them to the toxic food supply

So...basically starve them. Because everything we eat is "toxic" in some form.
Wanna know how many mouse hairs & bug parts are in a jar of peanut butter?

diabetes water
Diabetes water? Water causes diabetes?

pesticides

Bugs support your "Ban Pesticides" call.

get them sunlight and exercise. In most cases that will cure their chronic disease.

"Johnny!, go out and run the 4-minute mile! That'll cure your Leukemia!! Not that nasty chemotherapy and medicine shit!"


You cant even discuss things like a normal person. Killed? Come on. I should be surprised as much as you have to rely on the juvenile insults when you have nothing substantive to say.

Discussing things with you isn't exactly a walk in the park, considering the sources & so-called facts you post every day.
 
How can people with critical thinking skills see this will the rabid vaxers are blind to it?



The TV news that was bought by The Big Pharma 30 years ago & are paid to lie to you about all things that profit Big Pharma & ultimately the TV news.

RFK has many flaws, but he’s been spot on about this issue for decades. People like Jon Stewart & Joe Scarborough used to thank him on camera for his courage in taking on Big Pharma over the vaccine issue.

Their silence has since been bought.

These are the same people who lied to you about Covid & told you the Covid Vaxx would stop transmission & contraction of the virus, they are the same people who’ve been lying to you about childhood vaccines & poisoning generations of children.

It’s time this stopped.


Jimmy Dore...another CTer.

 
Jimmy Dore...another CTer.

Wikipedia? 🤣 🤣 🤣

CIA and FBI computers used for Wikipedia edits

Feel free to point out what he said that's not accurate instead of using Wikipedia as a crutch.
 
All medications have a chance of having an adverse reaction. There's no need for this unnecessary risk.
Not giving it can cause an unnecessary risk as well
 
So...basically starve them. Because everything we eat is "toxic" in some form.
Wanna know how many mouse hairs & bug parts are in a jar of peanut butter?


Diabetes water? Water causes diabetes?



Bugs support your "Ban Pesticides" call.



"Johnny!, go out and run the 4-minute mile! That'll cure your Leukemia!! Not that nasty chemotherapy and medicine shit!"




Discussing things with you isn't exactly a walk in the park, considering the sources & so-called facts you post every day.
Its clear you don't have much else to say so you are getting even more juvenile. Get back to me when you can discuss things like an adult.
 
How can people with critical thinking skills see this will the rabid vaxers are blind to it?



The TV news that was bought by The Big Pharma 30 years ago & are paid to lie to you about all things that profit Big Pharma & ultimately the TV news.

RFK has many flaws, but he’s been spot on about this issue for decades. People like Jon Stewart & Joe Scarborough used to thank him on camera for his courage in taking on Big Pharma over the vaccine issue.

Their silence has since been bought.

These are the same people who lied to you about Covid & told you the Covid Vaxx would stop transmission & contraction of the virus, they are the same people who’ve been lying to you about childhood vaccines & poisoning generations of children.

It’s time this stopped.

Wow, you are deep into the conspiracy rabit hole.
 
Correct. It's recommended that infants get the hepatitis B vaccine on their first day of life eventhough you usually only catch it from sex or iv drug use. Thats insane to recommend it for a newborn baby. Why not wait until they are 14? Because more people might not get it if they waited which is less profits for big pharma.
Post #80

IIRC mother to child transfer is a threat.

Let's see....

Maternal Infection:
If the mother has Hepatitis B, the baby will receive an extra dose of HepB and potentially Hepatitis B Immune Globulin (HBIG) within 12 hours of birth to provide immediate protection.
Post #81


Thanks for correcting the misinformation spewed by @NOLA Dude.
 
Post #80


Post #81


Thanks for correcting the misinformation spewed by @NOLA Dude.
All pregnant moms are tested before they deliver so it would be known if the mom had hepatitis B. That would be the time to give the newborn the hepatitis B vaccine and not every baby so big pharma can make more money.

That was already mentioned by me in this thread. Try to keep up.
 
Vaxxers don't want to hear this !!

I was asking my 83 year old mom yesterday when she was a youngster, did people fall ill all the time from mental issues like dementia/alzheimers etc and she said she only remembers 1 person ever being like that

not its very very prevalent. What's changed ?

same with autism etc .... its not a "well we diagnose it better now" bs ..... something has changed
 
You guys call anything a conspiracy theory that you haven't been spoonfed by the corporate media.
Or....your just in deep to the conspiracy theory rabbit hole.

lol
 
Vaxxers don't want to hear this !!

I was asking my 83 year old mom yesterday when she was a youngster, did people fall ill all the time from mental issues like dementia/alzheimers etc and she said she only remembers 1 person ever being like that

not its very very prevalent. What's changed ?

same with autism etc .... its not a "well we diagnose it better now" bs ..... something has changed
What changed? Understanding of mental disease and disorder, the ability to measure and diagnoses these things.

Back in the day, they just shipped kids off to the Asylum. People didn't see a lot of these people because they were hidden away. We don't do that anymore, and we now understand a lot more about the conditions and diseases that would have, in the past, landed someone in an Asylum and have better treatment and care for them.

You wanna go back to asylums? Or should we continue to pursue science and understanding, while expanding medical tech and treatment?
 
..."There’s no record of Verstraeten publicly presenting a relative risk of 11.35. Instead, the number appears in a 2004 presentation from SafeMinds, an autism-focused anti-vaccine group that helped bring thimerosal concerns to prominence in the first place.'

Post #86

`````````````````````````
More from your Factcheck article;

...SafeMinds says in the presentation that it obtained statistical tables from Verstraeten’s early analyses via a Freedom of Information Act request. The group claims the data showed a relative risk of autism of 7.62 to 11.35 in children with the highest exposures to thimerosal versus those who weren’t exposed in their first month of life. The presentation does not include the actual documents the group says it obtained via the FOIA request, and the presentation does not include details like confidence intervals. (We reached out to SafeMinds about getting the original documents but did not get a reply.)

It is unclear on what Kennedy bases his assertion that a relative risk of 11.35 corresponds to risk from the hepatitis B vaccine. SafeMinds suggests that achieving the highest category of thimerosal in a child’s first month “required an unusual pattern of exposure,” consisting, for instance, of a hepatitis B vaccine plus another vaccine given early.

Even if Verstraeten did come up with a relative risk of 11.35 at some point — a fact that is not established — it would have been incorrect to conclude based on such a preliminary analysis that vaccines were behind “the autism epidemic.” And of course, much more rigorous studies have since been performed, rendering any of these early findings entirely moot.

In fact, Verstraeten wrote in 2004: “Continuing the debate of the validity of the screening study is a waste of scientific energy and not to the benefit of the safety of US children or of all children worldwide that have the privilege of being vaccinated.”...

````````````````````````````

Junior is an out-and-out liar. That trump empowered this dishonest anti-vaxxer highlights the current President's complete contempt for all Americans - including our children.
 
Vaxxers don't want to hear this !!

I was asking my 83 year old mom yesterday when she was a youngster, did people fall ill all the time from mental issues like dementia/alzheimers etc and she said she only remembers 1 person ever being like that

not its very very prevalent. What's changed ?

same with autism etc .... its not a "well we diagnose it better now" bs ..... something has changed
Right and there are many medical conditions we see now that we rarely or didn't see in the past.

We are exposed to so many toxic things and our government has allowed it so that the companies can make more money.
 
Don't worry, that's coming in 6 months (despite the claim that this study exists now). It takes some time to cook the numbers.

HHS is doing studies now which should be done in 6 months and the data will be released to the public.

I thought the studies were already done.
 
stealthycat said:
Vaxxers don't want to hear this !!
I was asking my 83 year old mom yesterday when she was a youngster, did people fall ill all the time from mental issues like dementia/alzheimers etc and she said she only remembers 1 person ever being like that
not its very very prevalent. What's changed ?
same with autism etc .... its not a "well we diagnose it better now" bs ..... something has changed

`````````````````````````````````````

"Something has changed", alright: People in this country live longer and thus are more vulnerable to developing and exhibiting age-related dementia.
 
I thought the studies were already done.
No no no....I mean yes because RFK Jr was apparently quoting it. But no no no. Otherwise, wouldn't we have released that study already? Right? I mean, if we have it and we know the results enough to be spewing it out to entertainment hosts, you'd think we'd just go ahead and release it right away. There would be no need for a 6 months, as it exists now. But no no no, it doesn't exist now, it will take 6 months. It's just that JFK Jr has knowledge of the future (at least 6 months worth) and knows what the result will be.
 
..."There’s no record of Verstraeten publicly presenting a relative risk of 11.35. Instead, the number appears in a 2004 presentation from SafeMinds, an autism-focused anti-vaccine group that helped bring thimerosal concerns to prominence in the first place.'

Post #86

`````````````````````````
More from your Factcheck article;

...SafeMinds says in the presentation that it obtained statistical tables from Verstraeten’s early analyses via a Freedom of Information Act request. The group claims the data showed a relative risk of autism of 7.62 to 11.35 in children with the highest exposures to thimerosal versus those who weren’t exposed in their first month of life. The presentation does not include the actual documents the group says it obtained via the FOIA request, and the presentation does not include details like confidence intervals. (We reached out to SafeMinds about getting the original documents but did not get a reply.)

It is unclear on what Kennedy bases his assertion that a relative risk of 11.35 corresponds to risk from the hepatitis B vaccine. SafeMinds suggests that achieving the highest category of thimerosal in a child’s first month “required an unusual pattern of exposure,” consisting, for instance, of a hepatitis B vaccine plus another vaccine given early.

Even if Verstraeten did come up with a relative risk of 11.35 at some point — a fact that is not established — it would have been incorrect to conclude based on such a preliminary analysis that vaccines were behind “the autism epidemic.” And of course, much more rigorous studies have since been performed, rendering any of these early findings entirely moot.

In fact, Verstraeten wrote in 2004: “Continuing the debate of the validity of the screening study is a waste of scientific energy and not to the benefit of the safety of US children or of all children worldwide that have the privilege of being vaccinated.”...

````````````````````````````

Junior is an out-and-out liar. That trump empowered this dishonest anti-vaxxer highlights the current President's complete contempt for all Americans - including our children.
Which, interestingly enough, thimerosal was already NOT being used in vaccines for kids at that time.
 
I thought the studies were already done.
The study that CDC suppressed about Hepatitis B? I don't see them releasing a manipulated study.

The one that they are doing now is comprehensive and will be finished in 6 months and the data will be made public.
 
The study that CDC suppressed about Hepatitis B? I don't see them releasing a manipulated study.

The one that they are doing now is comprehensive and will be finished in 6 months and the data will be made public.
If it was manipulated, why would it claim that there is a 1135% increase in autism risk?
 
The study that CDC suppressed about Hepatitis B? I don't see them releasing a manipulated study.

The one that they are doing now is comprehensive and will be finished in 6 months and the data will be made public.

If the CDC supressed a study, it has to be somewhere. The scientists did work prior to writing the paper and publishing.
 
Back
Top Bottom