• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

RFK Jr.'s lawyer and top ally asked FDA to revoke approval of polio vaccine

McConnell was also “blistering on his Senate remarks re 6JAN2021!

Read McConnell's remarks on the Senate floor following Trump's acquittal

www.cnn.com

**** him!
 
Yes. I remember. And worth revisiting.

McConnel's blistering came after Trump's acquittal. After he, himself, voted to acquit. ". . . McConnell said he voted to acquit because he did not believe convicting an ex-president was constitutional." (Trump acquitted for second time following historic Senate impeachment trial) A conviction might have kept him out of the 2024 election.

So, the question becomes does his blistering but indirect warning to RFK differ from the barrage with which he blasted Trump?

“They did this because they had been fed wild falsehoods by the most powerful man on Earth — because he was angry he’d lost an election.

“Former President Trump’s actions preceding the riot were a disgraceful dereliction of duty.

“The House accused the former President of, quote, ‘incitement.’ That is a specific term from the criminal law.

“Let me put that to the side for one moment and reiterate something I said weeks ago: There is no question that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of that day.

“The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their President." (Your reference link)

After the fact, McConnell placed responsibility without consequences. This time the warning comes in advance. There are more than a few posters here who believe that because Republicans enjoy the slightest of majorities and allegedly tremble at Trump's retribution, Congress is in the bag and will kowtow to Trump's wishes. In a contest between expanding an imperial Presidency and preserving the prerogatives of Congress, I don't see the numbers adding up that way. Especially when some of Trump's appointments are akin to a call for a "Spanky and Our Gang" playhouse production, McConnell just might make RFK's rejection an object lesson. Or, not.

January, when confirmation hearings will likely begin, will ought to clarify the landscape some. Playground or battlefield.
 
I was 5 years old when the vaccine came out, I remember the sigh of relief from parents and schools, I also remember the Iron lungs. The vaccine was given out free and put in the public domain
 

For the anti Vax crowd even "convincing evidence" is a subjective term. Just because they convinced themselves after a doomscrolling session doesn't make it evidence.

People really need to be more scientifically aware - even those of us not necessarily good at science. That means understanding that it's been tried and tested and is likely nearer to correct than some kook on the internet.

They need to be more politically aware too. Eggs got more expensive so let's give the screwball convicted felon and his rich screwball friends another shot. Yeah it worked a treat last time...
 
Conservatives are pro-death.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…