- Joined
- May 12, 2014
- Messages
- 8,455
- Reaction score
- 6,292
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
You talk a big game about being an expert, but you posts haven't demonstrated that you are any kind expert.
How would you know? Seriously - what's your background?
The guy who still claims the discredited Proximal Origins paper is proof that covid was zoonotic and not from a lab? Thats hilarious.
Discredited by whom?
It’s telling you couldn't respond specifically to the things I pointed out they lied about during covid. Shouldn't "experts" be able to do that?
Jaeger already did that, and I agreed with him. Had he not posted that, I would have posted something very similar.
Strawman noted. I never said no vaccines work. But the covid vaccine didn't do what they told us it would do.
Who told you? We already went over this, as did Jaeger. The vaccines were very, very good. What you think you were told? That came from the right. Nobody that understands vaccines and immunity ever made those claims, because that's not how vaccines work. But if simplifications were made in addressing 300 million people, few of whom had the background to understand immunity, wouldn't that be understandable?
N95 masks help with Covid. The surgical masks are just windows dressing.
Really? Why? Are you going to tell me about the size of a virus particle vs. the pore sizes of various masks? Then I will remind you that viruses don't live outside of water droplets, which are much larger.
Fauci admitted the social distancing wasnt based on science. How can you defend that?
It wasn't based on any specific study. It was based on common sense, and what we already knew about transmission.
Like I said before, if you deny distance and masks helped to minimize transmission, you are denying germ theory. And you're probably only doing it for COVID, because nobody is that stupid when it comes to the flu or colds. You keep your distance.
You stick to these vague statements. Why don't you respond more specifically to my claims? For a supposed experts you seem to be lacking on details.
I was referring to your team's crazy claims. The COVID vaccine(s) contain tracking chips, they change our DNA, they cause infertility, they cause cancer, etc. Boneheaded stuff.
That article frames legitimate worries about rushed trials & infertility risks while ignoring pharma indemnification and trial deaths.
No, that article listed a bunch of conspiracy theories. No surprise here that you are defending them as serious concerns.