• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

RFK Jr., HHS to Link Autism to Tylenol Use in Pregnancy and Folate Deficiencies

Conclusions
In this study, cord biomarkers of fetal exposure to acetaminophen were associated with significantly increased risk of childhood ADHD and ASD in a dose-response fashion. Our findings support previous studies regarding the association between prenatal and perinatal acetaminophen exposure and childhood neurodevelopmental risk and warrant additional investigations.


"Dose-response fashion." Tell me what you think that means please.
 
That's quite a line of bullshit. I was not corrected. Someone merely uttered left wing spin.

And yet you lie some more, since I proved you wrong with sourced quotes. Why do you need to lie?

Any way you attempt to spin it, they both politicized the vaccine. Instead of making it about the vaccine, they made it about Trump. Anyone with functioning neurons understood that the vaccine would not be approved without the experts buying off on the science and the clinical trials. They should have simply left partisan politics out of it and recommended that everyone get the vaccine when it became available. Instead, they put the vaccine in a bad light publicly if developed during the Trump Administration. And the reality is that the left was never really on board with the vaccines until Joey and Kammie became president and vice president elect.

Deflection tsk tsk.

Watch the 2020 presidential debates. They are available on YouTube.

Nope...prove your claim. Half truths where you leave out the full statements are still lies. Put up or ...?
 
I linked two studies. What more do you want?

Scientists say that the most-robust research has found no link. “The better-controlled studies are less likely to find even a small risk,” says Helen Tager-Flusberg, a psychologist who studies autism at Boston University in Massachusetts. “And even then, what we’re talking about is a minor association. We do not think that taking acetaminophen is in any way contributing to actually causing autism.”
...
The study led by Ahlqvist harnessed data from nearly 2.5 million children born in Sweden between 1995 and 2019 and — from the country’s extensive health records — data on paracetamol prescriptions during pregnancy and on self-reported use collected by midwives, as well as whether children later received autism diagnoses.

The study showed that around 1.42% of children exposed to paracetamol during pregnancy were autistic, compared with 1.33% of children who were not exposed ─ a “very small” difference, says Ahlqvist.

The team also compared pairs of siblings (born to the same mother), in which one had been exposed to paracetamol and one had not. Siblings share half of their genome, a similar upbringing and maternal health, so differences in autism are more likely to be due to the drug. Using this method, the researchers found no association between paracetamol and autism — which supports the idea that links found in other studies could be explained by confounding factors.

A large, high-quality study<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02876-1#ref-CR2" data-track="click" data-action="anchor-link" data-track-label="go to reference" data-track-category="references">2</a> from Japan of more than 200,000 children — also using sibling comparisons and published this year — found no link between paracetamol use in pregnancy and autism.

So that's the thing. Robust, better-controlled studies do not show this risk. Furthermore, when you push for variable isolation, such as comparing siblings, all association disappears. There are no studies that show causal effects of acetaminophen and autism, and robust studies with variable isolation show no to minimal effects.
 

57 percent not confident in medical information cited by RFK Jr.: Survey​


More than half of registered voters are not confident in medical information cited by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., according to a new poll.

When asked in the Quinnipiac University poll about their level of confidence “in medical information cited by Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,” 57 percent of respondents said they are “not so confident” or “not confident at all.”



That number is way too low. What is wrong with some people?
 

57 percent not confident in medical information cited by RFK Jr.: Survey​


More than half of registered voters are not confident in medical information cited by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., according to a new poll.

When asked in the Quinnipiac University poll about their level of confidence “in medical information cited by Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,” 57 percent of respondents said they are “not so confident” or “not confident at all.”



That number is way too low. What is wrong with some people?
Only 57%? That ****er obviously just makes shit up all the time.
 
And yet you lie some more, since I proved you wrong with sourced quotes. Why do you need to lie?
BS.
Deflection tsk tsk.
I accept your surrender. Joey and Kammie irresponsibly politicized the vaccines. They should have simply recommended that everyone get the vaccines when they became available.
Nope...prove your claim. Half truths where you leave out the full statements are still lies. Put up or ...?
I did. View the 2020 presidential and vice-presidential debates on YouTube. You want links? Joey and Kammie were the first anti-vaxxers.
 

LOL that's not even disputing it...it's hiding.

I accept your surrender. Joey and Kammie irresponsibly politicized the vaccines. They should have simply recommended that everyone get the vaccines when they became available.

Dont self-comfort...you didnt earn it. You tried to move the goal posts and backpedal from your half truth without the context. (Quite the 🥨) "More words" arent context.

Do better if you want to improve your self-esteem.

I did. View the 2020 presidential and vice-presidential debates on YouTube. You want links? Joey and Kammie were the first anti-vaxxers.

Nope. Produce quotes or admit you are posting in bad faith lying to posters with info you've already been shown is wrong. 🤷
 
Intentional ignorance of the full quote.

Harris was asked if Americans should take the vaccine and if she would. Harris says that if doctors “tells us that we should take it, I’ll be the first in line to take it, absolutely. But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it, I’m not taking it.”
The part of your quote that I highlighted in Red turned it into an anti-vaxx statement. Trump certainly would have told everyone as a whole including Biden and Harris that they should take it. Therefore, if you take Harris at her word, if it were approved and released while Trump was still in office, she would not have taken it. She was an anti-vaxxer, even if it was over TDS.
 
The part of your quote that I highlighted in Red turned it into an anti-vaxx statement. Trump certainly would have told everyone as a whole including Biden and Harris that they should take it. Therefore, if you take Harris at her word, if it were approved and released while Trump was still in office, she would not have taken it. She was an anti-vaxxer, even if it was over TDS.

"Certainly?" He's "certainly" not on board with that now, he's been ambiguous with RFK.

You just keep digging yourself a deeper hole. And you highlighting the red without the context is just another lie by omission...a half-truth used to push your partisan narrative. Harris clearly provided the context and the recommendation based on experts.
 
LOL that's not even disputing it...it's hiding.



Dont self-comfort...you didnt earn it. You tried to move the goal posts and backpedal from your half truth without the context. (Quite the 🥨) "More words" arent context.

Do better if you want to improve your self-esteem.



Nope. Produce quotes or admit you are posting in bad faith lying to posters with info you've already been shown is wrong. 🤷
Whether or not you want to admit it, Joey and Kammie were anti-vaxxers in 2020.
 
"Certainly?" He's "certainly" not on board with that now, he's been ambiguous with RFK.
Trump is absolutely on board with vaccines and Covid, with the possible exception of giving it to infants. Personally, I have taken all the covid shots and will continue to do so, however, with the pandemic long over, I am not sure it's worth the risk of giving it to children. I would go with individual pediatricians' advice.
You just keep digging yourself a deeper hole. And you highlighting the red without the context is just another lie by omission...a half-truth used to push your partisan narrative. Harris clearly provided the context and the recommendation based on experts.
You are twisting yourself in knots in very partisan fashion just like Harris did. The context is in what I highlighted. "But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it, I’m not taking it.” That is in effect saying that if Trump told her she should take it, she would refuse to take it. I think if you try real hard, you can probably work out that Trump certainly would have told everyone that they should take the vaccines. After all if was his Operation Warp Speed that made them available in record time. She was playing politics with a vaccine that the left now insists saved millions of lives. Very irresponsible.
 
The part of your quote that I highlighted in Red turned it into an anti-vaxx statement. Trump certainly would have told everyone as a whole including Biden and Harris that they should take it. Therefore, if you take Harris at her word, if it were approved and released while Trump was still in office, she would not have taken it. She was an anti-vaxxer, even if it was over TDS.

Reread the quote.

It does NOT say if it were approved and released while Trump was still in office, she would not have taken it.

It says "if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it, I’m not taking it."

I don't take advice from Donald Trump.

Do you?
 
Trump is absolutely on board with vaccines and Covid, with the possible exception of giving it to infants. Personally, I have taken all the covid shots and will continue to do so, however, with the pandemic long over, I am not sure it's worth the risk of giving it to children. I would go with individual pediatricians' advice.

You are twisting yourself in knots in very partisan fashion just like Harris did. The context is in what I highlighted. "But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it, I’m not taking it.” That is in effect saying that if Trump told her she should take it, she would refuse to take it. I think if you try real hard, you can probably work out that Trump certainly would have told everyone that they should take the vaccines. After all if was his Operation Warp Speed that made them available in record time. She was playing politics with a vaccine that the left now insists saved millions of lives. Very irresponsible.

Do you take medical advice from Trump?
 
Autism was around for decades before Tylenol was ever invented, so don’t give me that s**t about Tylenol. Talcum powder is an entirely different thing that is breathed through the lungs.

what isn't different is that it was sold as safe for 120 years when in fact it wasn't at all
 
The part of your quote that I highlighted in Red turned it into an anti-vaxx statement. Trump certainly would have told everyone as a whole including Biden and Harris that they should take it. Therefore, if you take Harris at her word, if it were approved and released while Trump was still in office, she would not have taken it. She was an anti-vaxxer, even if it was over TDS.

Only for MAGA morons that CHOSE to take it out of context and ignore the entire statement. So...ok, I see your point ;)
 
Trump is absolutely on board with vaccines and Covid, with the possible exception of giving it to infants. Personally, I have taken all the covid shots and will continue to do so, however, with the pandemic long over, I am not sure it's worth the risk of giving it to children. I would go with individual pediatricians' advice.

"After RFK Jr.’s controversial Senate testimony on vaccine policy, Trump said: "“He means very well… he’s got a different take… I like the fact that he’s different.” Trump repeatedly emphasized, “I’m not a doctor,” which lets him float controversial ideas while sidestepping accountability." link

That's TACO refusing to take a side...intentionally "ambiguous." Not exactly building confidence in vaxes.

You are twisting yourself in knots in very partisan fashion just like Harris did. The context is in what I highlighted. "But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it, I’m not taking it.” That is in effect saying that if Trump told her she should take it, she would refuse to take it. I think if you try real hard, you can probably work out that Trump certainly would have told everyone that they should take the vaccines. After all if was his Operation Warp Speed that made them available in record time. She was playing politics with a vaccine that the left now insists saved millions of lives. Very irresponsible.

Only for MAGA morons that CHOSE to take it out of context and ignore the entire statement. So...ok, I see your point ;)
 
Only for MAGA morons that CHOSE to take it out of context and ignore the entire statement. So...ok, I see your point ;)
Harris made the context quite clear. She said if Trump told her she should take the vaccine, she would not take it. Those are her words. What she said before that was just attempted political cover.
 
what isn't different is that it was sold as safe for 120 years when in fact it wasn't at all

Not sold as completely safe...I've got a bottle in my hand and it has at least 6 different warnings on it which explain risks. Here's one of them: "If pregnant or breast feeding, ask a health professional before use."
 
Back
Top Bottom