My memory is fine. It is easy to remember arguments I've won, when the opposing side presented a position of made up nonsense.
The only nonsense is California sb777 and the supplemental bills attached to it.
The OP that you adhered to was from a crackpot organization that posts nothing by crackpot, hyperbolic, hysterical, lunatic rantings that have no basis in reality.
WND & the others claimed that new legislation signed by Schwarzenegger would drive anything out of the classroom that could be deemed offensive to homosexual and transgendered students.
This opinion caused you and the others to make your wild charges of Homophobia, bigotry and hysteria.
It looks like EQCA (Equality California(hardly a group that would ally itself with WND)) agrees:
"sb777 prohibits curriculum that is discriminatorily biased against LGBT people and other protected groups."
link
***<<<please note the RED clinched fist>>>***
You could not refute the research that Simon and I presented, and, because that really sucked for you and your position. Research was used to support the bill. It was accepted because it was valid. I know that you want this to not be true, but it is. Sorry.
A survey? Where's the actual hard evidence that something discriminatory being taught in the California public schools that would at least demonstrate need for this bill?
The only thing Simon & you could say was to the effect that it's the voters' choice in that area as to who they elect and the legislation that goes along with it.
...par for course for the bay-side of California I say...
It includes LGBT issues to prevent discrimination. Inclusive, as I have said. You can try to twist this, but all your doing is twisting a noose around your position.
Why are gay rights (read Marxist) groups touting sb777 as a victory because it: "prohibits curriculum that is discriminatorily biased against LGBT people and other protected groups.", then??
If this bill was about being inclusionary, where is the evidence of the "discriminatorily biased" material that either 1.) was being taught in the California public schools, or 2.)was being suggested by some as something that
should be taught in the California public schools, that these "gay rights" groups (the one's who had Sheila Keuhl's ear and pressed for this bill), are talking about????
Another demand to threadjack. This was explained to you in the other thread. It is not my fault if you refuse to believe reality.
I'd say this topic was thread-jacked in post one when the original OP created some wild assertion involving pedophilia as to why WND objected to SB777.
Another one who would prefer to stay with his myopic little position even after it has been refuted and shown to be nonsense. No integrity or credibility. Shame. There have been times I have agreed with you and enjoyed your posts.
I'm not myopic.
I see way past any political groups that covet & stoke my indignation for their own expedient political gains...