- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 12,177
- Reaction score
- 7,551
- Location
- Ft. Campbell, KY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
So once again you stick your foot in your mouth. If you would have read this whole thread you would see where I stated that the trip would cost around 300 million. But you can cont to tell your nonsense about what you claimed I said.
So wheres the beef?
I have a beef with Obama spending the money to start with. Just like I would be pissed if it was Bush Jr or Sr during this recession. We dont have the money and must borrow it for this stupid ass trip. There are Americans out of work, out of unemployment checks and out of "Hope" of getting a job. Does Obama really need to be jetting off like a King and spending money we do have? HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Then there are these partisan hacks in the media making excuses just the same as posters here. Its not the amount of money, its spending money you dont have to begin with.
Let me ask you this. If you had no money in your pocket (America), living on credit (America), your economic portfolio for the future is bleak (America), would you be flying off to another country staying in the grandest of grand with 1000 of your best buddies while your wife and children stayed at home and starved? Well this is how I see this stupid ****ed up trip. And I dont give a ratass what letter is by the President name taking this trip.
How's the sand today? You might want to face the other way for a while. Wouldn't want your bum to burn from exposure.Haha. Breathe? Please?
How's the sand today? You might want to face the other way for a while. Wouldn't want your bum to burn from exposure.
A vet and patriot. Cant say the same now can you.Who are you again? Your irrelevance is almost as puzzling as your diatribes.
How's the sand today? You might want to face the other way for a while. Wouldn't want your bum to burn from exposure.
If you have nothing to add dont let the thread door hit you on the way out.
BTW, why is it that you liberals whine and cry about spending our Grandkids money when a republican is in office then have no problem Obama spending like Royalty when we started borrowing money back in March? Why arent you libs screaming, crying and flopping on the floor now?
A vet and patriot. Cant say the same now can you.
Moderator's Warning: |
So mods this type of immaturity is allowed at this site?
And after this personal attack they have the balls to say I am on course to be banned? LOL
Moderator's Warning: |
So mods this type of immaturity is allowed at this site?
And after this personal attack they have the balls to say I am on course to be banned? LOL
So wheres the beef?
I have a beef with Obama spending the money to start with. Just like I would be pissed if it was Bush Jr or Sr during this recession. We dont have the money and must borrow it for this stupid ass trip. There are Americans out of work, out of unemployment checks and out of "Hope" of getting a job. Does Obama really need to be jetting off like a King and spending money we do have? HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Then there are these partisan hacks in the media making excuses just the same as posters here. Its not the amount of money, its spending money you dont have to begin with.
Let me ask you this. If you had no money in your pocket (America), living on credit (America), your economic portfolio for the future is bleak (America), would you be flying off to another country staying in the grandest of grand with 1000 of your best buddies while your wife and children stayed at home and starved? Well this is how I see this stupid ****ed up trip. And I dont give a ratass what letter is by the President name taking this trip.
What claims? The claim where I said the whole trip was going to cost around 300 million? Never did I claim 200 million a day. I only said that some on this thread couldn't prove it isn't 200 million a day just like it might cost 20 cents a day because the Admin wont release the costs.Back on topic, please. I'm curious to see if you have any substantial evidence backing up your claim.
Show me where Americans will be gaining any jobs. HD just had a lay off. If anything it will be putting layoff people back to work, which is good, but creating jobs is a huge stretch.No i meant where was your evidence he's spendin 200-300 million dollars a day.
But yes I would approve of this kind of trip because trade deals are good for business, good for growth, and good for jobs. So while he's spending money he's also creating it.
I mean you complain about how unemployment is high, then complain when Obama goes and signs a new trade deal which will increase job growth.
I would have to put the total cost of Obama's trip at or around 300 million.
Show me where Americans will be gaining any jobs. HD just had a lay off. If anything it will be putting layoff people back to work, which is good, but creating jobs is a huge stretch.
Now show me where I claimed such a thing. I said 300 million for the whole trip. If you going to accuse someone of something at least have your facts straight before embarrassing yourself.
* The sale by Boeing of 30 new 737 aircraft to private Indian airline SpiceJet. The White House says this will help support over 12,000 US jobs.
* Preliminary agreement had been reached on the Indian purchase of 10 Boeing C-17s military transport planes.
* The sale by GE of fighter 107 F414 jet engines to the Indian military.
* A separate deal with GE worth $500m (£309m) for the sale of six heavy duty gas turbines and three steam turbines to India's Reliance Energy Ltd.
* Harley-Davidson plans a new plant in India to assemble American-made motorcycle kits.
* The White House said India had identified GE subsidiary GE Transportation, based in Erie, Pennsylvania, and Electro-Motive Diesel, of LaGrange, Illinois, a unit of Caterpillar Inc, as bidders to supply Indian railways with over 1,000 diesel locomotives over 10 years.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...sults-obamas-india-trip-3.html#post1059087004
For those with the ability to claim one thing when its clear its another.
I show you in the OP of this topic:
I mean the big one at the bottom is 1,000 diesel locomotives over 10 years.
Also I looked back at your posts and I didn't see where you said 200-300 million a day, my mistake. I do apologize for that error. However, now I'm going to ask for evidence that it costs 300 million for the total trip. So please provide me with that.
Lets just use the cheapest room rate. 580x3600=2,088,000 a night. That's not counting any room service or any other fees. 2,088,000x7= 14,616,000. Obama's room alone is 300,000 for the stay. Just between rooms and Air Force 1 thats 16 million and thats without even counting his 45 cars and the shipping costs, flights of his 1000 people, meals, entertainment, security and military personal and you dont believe its going to cost 200 million. HAHAHA
Sorry dude, I never just believe something because its looking like its going that way. And I'm still gonna need a source for all that you've said.
So just checking in this morning, some conservatives still believe this outrageous and false claim of 200 million dollars a day?
Or have they recanted...?
WAS THIS The part where honor is restored?
I hate to rain on your Harley parade, Sir, but they have not had a credible racing victory since the 1960's. I'm sorry to say that Harley-Davidson bikes are a triumph of style over content. True, they were good in their heyday (about 50 years ago) but times have changed and motorbike technology has improved radically since then. Not that Harley Davidson seems to have noticed. They are overpriced, overweight and still overrated.
Now, that said, there's nothing wrong with owning a Harley. To each their own and if that's what you enjoy, then by all means buy as many Harley's as you can afford. Harley has stumbled on a business model that works for them and certain bikes are even beautiful and I'd almost venture to call them works of art, but let's not confuse that big, heavy piece of rolling chrome with the true technical advancements that are being made by other manufacturers.
Now, let's get back on topic, shall we?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?