- Joined
- May 25, 2024
- Messages
- 6,626
- Reaction score
- 1,413
Is there a point to your post?Salaries are expenses, not income.
Is there a point to your post?Salaries are expenses, not income.
Do you think colleges and universities should pay taxes? Trump thinks Harvard should pay taxes, should they all pay taxes?That's what they're counting on.
Yes.Do you think colleges and universities should pay taxes? Trump thinks Harvard should pay taxes, should they all pay taxes?
Why?Yes.
This isn't what qualifies as civilized debate. Accusing the poster of being a peeping tom is lowWhy? Do you try to sneak up on my when I'm looking in a mirror?
Of course not. This probably due to a case of severe ideological blindness.After a quick review of your post, I don’t see how these groups can be connected to the support of terrorism.
It is, actually, advocacy for the destruction of the Israeli state. You should know this.How is a saying like “from the river to the sea,” the advocacy for a Palestinian state,
or any pro-Hamas rhetoric any different than that of radical Israeli settlers who displace Palestinians from homes they’ve lived in for years,
There is no 'apartheid form of governance' in Israel. You should also know this.any different than the apartheid form of governance that exists in Israel?
Regardless, I don't support NGOs or non-profit organizations which feed money and support to Hamas, a known terrorist organization.I don’t support either side described above.
Profit = income - expensesIs there a point to your post?
Is that the best you can do-dismiss it because of a minor inconvenience-your email? Speaking of pieces of trash; been on 'Truth' Social recently, because that's where most of it emanates from.Well, I can't read the bill since the stupid website requires my email so it's all I have to offer.
I am not signing up for spam from some liberal piece of trash news site.
Who gets to decide what is a "terrorist" organisation and what isn't? Trump; just like he refused entry to a French scientist because something critical of Trump was found on his phone. A paranoid, sociopathic and ego-driven snowflake-and a fascist, all in one; not a good mix.It allows the sec of Treasury to strip organizations of tax exempt status if he or she deems it a 'terrorist organization.'
The article is paywalled. But there is nothing wrong with doing this, as long as there is some coordination with the state dept as to what is considered by the USA a 'terrorist organization.'
Who gets to decide what is a "terrorist" organisation and what isn't? Trump; just like he refused entry to a French scientist because something critical of Trump was found on his phone. A paranoid, sociopathic and ego-driven snowflake-and a fascist, all in one; not a good mix.
![]()
French scientist denied US entry after phone messages critical of Trump found
France’s research minister said the scientist was traveling to Houston for a conference when his phone was searchedwww.theguardian.com
Lies, lies, lies-and all emanating from Israel's Ministry of Propaganda, almost verbatim.Of course not. This probably due to a case of severe ideological blindness.
It is, actually, advocacy for the destruction of the Israeli state. You should know this.
There is no 'apartheid form of governance' in Israel. You should also know this.
Regardless, I don't support NGOs or non-profit organizations which feed money and support to Hamas, a known terrorist organization.
I have no issue with taking steps to thwart them as well as thwarting the flow of their money and support to Hamas.
Really? So he gets to make unilateral decisions, irrespective of their legality or whatever Congress has to say? It's like his stacks of EOs; he seems to believe directives are automatically law. Welcome to the United Authoritarian States of America.The law says the president makes that determination.
Really? So he gets to make unilateral decisions, irrespective of their legality or whatever Congress has to say? It's like his stacks of EOs; he seems to believe directives are automatically law. Welcome to the United Authoritarian States of America.
This post is simply parroting Hamas propaganda.Lies, lies, lies-and all emanating from Israel's Ministry of Propaganda, almost verbatim.
Given that:
(a list of 10 members who appear to have served a number of years)List of Arab members of the Knesset - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
as well as:
![]()
Muslim man, Mizrahi woman picked to serve as Supreme Court justices, both firsts
Judicial Selection Committee makes 4 new appointments, including 2 women; justice minister says appointments represent 'a variety of opinions, genders and ethnic backgrounds'www.timesofisrael.com
which 'apartheid-like situation' are you referring to?
I have not been on Truth-Social for a while.Is that the best you can do-dismiss it because of a minor inconvenience-your email? Speaking of pieces of trash; been on 'Truth' Social recently, because that's where most of it emanates from.
One requirement of non-profits is they must serve for the public good. What constitutes 'public good' is debatable. Teaching and educating our kids is certainly in the public good. But once a school become political talking piece then it becomes far more questionable. My view is there's a difference between educating kids about the difference in political opinion vs using a school as a tool for protest, demonstration and social change.
Why?
The law lays out the criteria for an entity to be declared a terrorist organization.
Not arguing at this point, just curious and want to be right on this one going forward, can you please point me in the direction of the specific law that grants the president this power?
Both Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International as well as former Israeli officials have characterized it as like apartheid Reports of this easy to find on line.Of course not. This probably due to a case of severe ideological blindness.
It is, actually, advocacy for the destruction of the Israeli state. You should know this.
There is no 'apartheid form of governance' in Israel. You should also know this.
Regardless, I don't support NGOs or non-profit organizations which feed money and support to Hamas, a known terrorist organization.
I have no issue with taking steps to thwart them as well as thwarting the flow of their money and support to Hamas.
This will be the reason that bill doesn't pass.![]()
Republicans Sneak Nonprofit Killer Bill Into the Tail End of Trump’s 389-Page Tax Plan
It would give the Trump administration the power to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit it deems a “terrorist-supporting organization.”theintercept.com
It would give the Trump administration the power to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit it deems a “terrorist-supporting organization.”
More stomping out dissent and going after anything that isn’t inline with their dog shit far right extremist views.
More gov overreach and authoritarian abuse.
Hopefully this monstrosity will be killed in the Senate.
All you are presenting with this argument is:Both Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International as well as former Israeli officials have characterized it as like apartheid Reports of this easy to find on line.
Completely irrelevant, as its not about you.I've gotten things that help me with day-to-day life from Amazon. Haven't gotten shit from Harvard.
Both the organizations have reported on all countries in the region (as well as the world) for decades. True, their analysis can be challenged. But why not read their reports and understand or contest their characterizations?All you are presenting with this argument is:
An argument from authority[a] is a form of argument in which the opinion of an authority figure (or figures) is used as evidence to support an argument.[1]The argument from authority is a logical fallacy,[2] and obtaining knowledge in this way is fallible.[3][4]A common cognitive bias is that it is a practical and sound way of obtaining knowledge that some presume to be correct when the authority is universally accepted, though some consider this to be an obvious circular reasoning and repetition of an argument from authority[1][5][6][7][8][9][10] and others consider to be a very weak defeasible argument or an outright fallacy.[2][11][12][13][14] The mere fact that an authority can be wrong or decide to lie means any appeal to authority must be further proved through valid logical deduction of the evidence anyway.[15][16][17]Argument from authority - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org