- Joined
- Apr 29, 2012
- Messages
- 18,536
- Reaction score
- 9,195
- Location
- On an island. Not that one!
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
I see you're fond of twisting genuine replies.Hmm... Deny the primacy of your Progressive beliefs then fail to mention them at all. Are we supposed to forge
That sure is some stupid conspiracy level BS right there!Atheists would prefer all to join them in actively denying God. But they are comfortable silencing public religious expression. Either alternative promotes atheism.
And that is just doubling down on the stupid.Of course it is. Atheism is a religion of denial. And, denial is a jealous god.
You fail to understand a public school or any government agency cannot endorse or validate your religion for you.You wrote that posting the 10 commandments in a public school is forcing them on non Christians.
Suppressing Christian expression in spite of the Constitutional guarantee of free exercise is unacceptable.
Atheists are insistent on others joining them in their denial of God. In their ideal world religious symbols and texts are banned from the classroom and public square. It's the same goal championed by so called open minded LeftistsNo, it's not.
Atheists do not believe in God. That isn't a religion. They cannot deny or be jealous of what they do not believe in.
So now you are back opposing teaching literacy to protect students from coercion.It would be.
No, Christians aren't free to express our beliefs. By your definition posting a copy of the 10 commandments is coercion.Christians are free to express their beliefs. They are not free to force them on the rest of the population.
What atheists would those be? I don't see atheists proselytizing or going door to door trying to get converts. That must be quite the fantasy in your mind.Atheists are insistent on others joining them in their denial of God. In their ideal world religious symbols and texts are banned from the classroom and public square. It's the same goal championed by so called open minded Leftists
Yes they are. You're just playing the victim here.No, Christians aren't free to express our beliefs. By your definition posting a copy of the 10 commandments is coercion.
I have never seen this happen. Atheists do not believe in God, but they do not go out and knock on doors and tell people to join them.Atheists are insistent on others joining them in their denial of God. In their ideal world religious symbols and texts are banned from the classroom and public square. It's the same goal championed by so called open minded Leftists
I never said anything about that. I said religion doesn't belong in the classroom.So now you are back opposing teaching literacy to protect students from coercion.
You are free to express your beliefs. You are not free to post them in public classrooms. Not every child is a Christian and it would be unfair to force them to have to look at the tenants of a religion they do not belong to.No, Christians aren't free to express our beliefs. By your definition posting a copy of the 10 commandments is coercion.
You refuse to discuss what you wrote. Instead you just repeat the same talking points.I have never seen this happen. Atheists do not believe in God, but they do not go out and knock on doors and tell people to join them.
I never said anything about that. I said religion doesn't belong in the classroom.
You are free to express your beliefs. You are not free to post them in public classrooms. Not every child is a Christian and it would be unfair to force them to have to look at the tenants of a religion they do not belong to.
There you go. The free exercise of religion is redefined to quarantine worship to confinement within sanctuary walls on designated restrictive times. Yeah, that's freedom.The good news is that if they want to see the 10 commandments, they can go to church on Sunday and see them there.
Unconstitutional on its face.If you ever wondered why republicans get accused of forcing their religious beliefs on others, THIS is why.
He needs to be removed from office in disgrace.
Atheists would prefer all to join them in actively denying God. But they are comfortable silencing public religious expression.
Either alternative promotes atheism.
No, there is a prohibition against establishing a state religion. There is also a guarantee of the right to freely practice religion. Posting a copy of the 10 commandments on the classroom wall as it is in the SCOTUS chamber doesn't force any student to adopt Christian beliefs any more than it compels the SCOTUS to rule based on them.
But hey, mob rule to protect atheists sensibilities is Democrat rule of law.
Suppressing Christian expression in spite of the Constitutional guarantee of free exercise is unacceptable.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. |
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; |
The problem lies with the 'Christians' who block the religious expressions of those of different faiths. If a teacher reads a Bible verse, then a Qu'ran verse, followed by a passage from the Rig Vedas, I wouldn't have a problem - AS LONG AS THE WORDS FROM THOSE OTHER FAITHS ARE NOT DENIGRATED. However, such a discussion is not really suitable in a high school classroom, the kids generally haven't had enough exposure to cultures outside of their neighbourhood to understand how widely-varying beliefs may be compared., though this may not be true in large city schools.
Actually the commandment reads in the King James Version: "3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me."
A rational person might think that the person(s) who wrote the commandments accepted the reality of the existence of multiple deities but that the Israelites could only worship YHWH - just ignore those other guys and dolls in the celestial sphere. We talked about this in my high school, I graduated from a Catholic school, and I remember wondering about the plural statement. Then of course, there's that other commandment -
4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God
A commandment that has been ignored in the Church since the earliest days.
A semicolon separates two independent but closely related clauses. Its use in the 1A indicates freedom of religion is as important as freedom of speech.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The religious clause is separated by a semicolon, so it stands alone.
Kindly cite the Constitutional text creating these imaginary zones of government authority allowed to suppress religion. Not some grammatical backflip; the plain text selectively excluding these areas from Constitutional guarantees.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
Again, your fallacy is the fallacy of the missing middle. Government cannot allow "exercise" of religion in places where its employees have authority (courthouses, police stations, schools, government offices), because that would violate the first ten words. Free exercise applies everywhere else (including apparently the US Congress.)
Specify where the government is suppressing religion!A semicolon separates two independent but closely related clauses. Its use in the 1A indicates freedom of religion is as important as freedom of speech.
Kindly cite the Constitutional text creating these imaginary zones of government authority allowed to suppress religion. Not some grammatical backflip; the plain text selectively excluding these areas from Constitutional guarantees.
Again your fallacy places Constitutional rights at the whim of bureaucrats creating zones of authority.
I assume, then, that you would be fine with the government also forcing all public schools to post the Five Pillars of Islam in a conspicuous place in every school in the country? Along with the Four Puruṣārthas? What about the Seven Tenets of Satanism?No, there is a prohibition against establishing a state religion. There is also a guarantee of the right to freely practice religion. Posting a copy of the 10 commandments on the classroom wall as it is in the SCOTUS chamber doesn't force any student to adopt Christian beliefs any more than it compels the SCOTUS to rule based on them.
But hey, mob rule to protect atheists sensibilities is Democrat rule of law.
So why bother posting them? If it's just meant for those of the Christian/Jewish faiths, don't they hear and learn of those commandments in their churches and synagogues? Plus, posting them in a "government" school is exactly what the 1st Amendment forbids - the government imposing religious beliefs of just one religion on the populace. Get educated.No, there is a prohibition against establishing a state religion. There is also a guarantee of the right to freely practice religion. Posting a copy of the 10 commandments on the classroom wall as it is in the SCOTUS chamber doesn't force any student to adopt Christian beliefs any more than it compels the SCOTUS to rule based on them.
But hey, mob rule to protect atheists sensibilities is Democrat rule of law.
Not to mention scoring political points too. Just look at how frenzied certain theists get when it comes to the idea of government displays of religion. It's like they want everything to be plastered with Jesus, the Bible, or a cross.It is pathetic that so many people who are supposed to represent us in government seemed more concerned with political stunts…
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?