- Joined
- Oct 1, 2005
- Messages
- 38,750
- Reaction score
- 14,016
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
I know how insurance works. The rest is only logical.
Now you're claiming we don't know as a means to avoid my points.
Earlier in the thread, you said this:
First, if someone has a high fever with the flu, then they are already in dangerous territory. Second, it's not that she was unlucky, it was that she had H1N1. Please research cytokine storm and get back to me, thanks.
And if there was UHC, hospitals would be more on the ball about testing for H1N1, but as it stands they receive no public resources to do that. You forget that the public health option isn't just about individuals having coverage, but it also provides additional resources to hospitals for safety measures.
Blaming the victim is just sickening and I won't stand for it.
I assumed nothing; and you need to read more of this thread. Some of the "facts" aren't what they were reported as being.
And sometimes, the victim IS to blame. Don't really care if you'll "stand for it" or not. :roll: