Practically everything you have posted here has been debunked, and yet you keep repeating the same old lies. You seem to have no grasp of the facts or even the desire to educate yourself as to what they are. Seeing how much you mangle the English language in here it's not hard to understand why.
Let me get this straight.
I didn’t.
Reported by who? Can you provide any verifiable reference that quotes Byrd?
Would you think the same if you found out that Byrd never asserted “his rank as a lieutenant and his role as commander of the House chambers section would protect him and that he expected to “be treated differently”?
I agree with your point about hearsay, but what I've seen of his interview following the shooting also seems to support the reports of his attitude. And whether or not Turley supports Trump or not, I thought a lot of his points coincided with my own feelings regarding law enforcement officers and restraint. I do not believe my opinion would be swayed that much whether I knew Byrd's attitude or not, but if I'm being honest, I cannot say 100% since I learned about his character as part of trying to learn more on what happened.
Veins return blood from organs.
Using present librul logic The cop that killed George Floyd in NYC should be in the clear.
were the circumstances identical? no?
They were both unarmed in the commission of their alleged crimes. Close enough. Neither needed to be taken out by deadly force.
"close enough"? uh, no. totally different circumstances. a riot in the capitol endangering congress by police outnumbered by rioters versus....nothing like that. duh
clearly identical circumstances!Floyd was sitting peacefully with friends on a sidewalk when confronted by police...Babbit was unlawfully trespassing in a federal facility with an angry mob behind her, carrying a backpack of unknown contents. The federal facility held Congress, whom the armed angry mob was verbally threatening.
Care to try again?
Every investigation that I know of cleared him legally. This is a civil suit, and the Trump/Bondi DoJ is capitulating. They don't have to. They could fight it and win. This is just sending yet another message to would-be violent Trumpers that it's OK.
Stop it. She was unarmed. Or do you think the Capitol Police should have just opened up with an M-60 machine gun on all the protesters?Floyd was sitting peacefully with friends on a sidewalk when confronted by police...Babbit was unlawfully trespassing in a federal facility with an angry mob behind her, carrying a backpack of unknown contents. The federal facility held Congress, whom the armed angry mob was verbally threatening.
Care to try again?
So, it's okay to shoot unarmed rioters. Got it.
If 100 people were surrounding you with the intent to kill you, do you think they'd succeed even if they were unarmed?
That's precisely what Trump suggested while he was hiding out in the WH bunker during the 2020 DC protest in front of the WH. He was talked out of it by his sec-def. As I've said many times, violence is OK with Trump as long as it's in his name.
It was fine to shoot unarmed protesters for an upside down Bible photo op so meh. Personally I thought they got off easy. I really expected the government to respond with shooting everyone entering the capital building. I still maintain that would be the result if the aggressors weren’t predominantly white.
uh, no , you clearly didn't "got it" lol
Cops typically do notshoot anyone who does not brandish a firearm or other deadly weapon at them. Was it the widdle biddy pocket knife in her pocket?
You always seem to have an argument with yourself., just like on the Roevember issue.
These guys all know better. To them, this is a MAGA win. They will never relent. If the cop was their cousin being threatened by a violent suspect, they'd be cheering the shooting and defending the cousin.No...you stop it
How could the cop know that? (Ignoring the part where you try to move the conversation away from your failed comparison.)
That sounds kind of fascist.
Generally, the Congress of the US is not threatened by a violent mob 2000 strong who is totally unpredictable screaming "Where's Nancy, and "Hang Mike Pence". This cop was in charge of protecting the Congress. If a SS agent did the same thing while protecting Trump and the suspect was unarmed, how would you feel?
Not really no but I understand republicans confusion as to what that word means. Taking over the capital building justifies the use of deadly force. Same with the White House. Do you honestly disagree with that?
All that sounds very extremist on your part. One, I am not a republican, and two, nobody took over the capitol building. And If Babbit had brandished a firearm and pointed it at police, then shooting and killing her would have been justified. You seem quite okay with the concept of just shooting anyone who walked into the Capitol building, armed or not. The Nazis would love that.