• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Report: Russia Hoax Was Built On ‘One Scant, Unclear, And Unverifiable Fragment Of A Sentence’

Fact: Trump Russian Collusion was a fabricated story developed and pushed by the left, specifically, the Hillary campaign, the Obama administration and his DOJ, CIA, and FBI. Later Biden and his circle would continue this. The lies about Trump, Covid, Russian Collusion all eminated from these sources and were pushed by them largely with the help of the biased left media.
The Durham report pointed this out but never went far enough in denouncing or laying blame when it should have come from. I see Durham as being just another guy too embedded in the swamp to fully condemn or expose it.
All the "fake news" pushed by democrats and liberal media was based on anonymous or highly partisan "sources". Take a molehill and make a mountain out of it. That's the democrat strategy. They lied about Collusion, they fabricated stories with the aid of Trump haters and got the media to push them. When proven wrong or suspicious they usually continued to push the story anyway. When not they simply concocted a new but similar line of attack.
Currently the democrat party is in complete disarray, but they continue to come up with Trump hate stories as the most consistent message coming from them. Democrats lost the 2024 election because of flawed candidates and policies. Specifically the border position and transgender stances. The other failure was a message by democrats to tell us that what we all saw with our own eyes and heard with our own ears was simply us being stupid.
You have a right to your own opinion but not your own facts. The fact is that every investigation concluded that Russia interfered with the 2016 election on Trump's behalf and Trump's campaign was active in that interference.
"Russia, if you're listening."
 
😆 Who thinks the liberal hack Colbert is an authority on bias?

Barr didn't allow Durham to look into everything. Barr was running cover for the FBI & the DOJ.
It's pretty well known the the intelligence agencies will go a long way to protect themselves an covering up their actions or screwups is certainly part of all that. How often have we actually be told the "truth" concerning America scandals in our politics? Most of America still believes the government explanation of the JFK assassination is total bullshit and the government has never done anything but continued to make Americans feel that way. That's just one high profile case of BS. More recently we have seen strong evidence to support that we were lied to about, Trump Russian Collusion, Biden family pay for play, Democrats involved in improper handling of classified materials, exaggeration in the Climate Chaos position by democrats and of course everything about Covid.
 
Except that it means there's no hoax. He wanted to lie because he wants to hide his relationship with Putin. Clinton was right, his allegiance is questionable.
You think Trump's business connections in Russia is somehow proof of the Hillary created Russia collusion hoax? You are grasping at straws.
 
You haven't said why it's fake, and you haven't read it.



Then if that's true you would be able to show what conclusion was based on the Steele Dossier as a source?



You are unable to say what conclusions or decisions were made based on the Steele dossier as a source. That's the Gabby claim. That the hoax was based on the Steele dossier. If that's true, then you can say which conclusion was based on the Steele dossier as a source.

So, what conclusions were based on the Steele dossier as a source?
The Steele Dossier was used as the background story for investigating Trump. It was fake and they all knew it was fake. It's been debunked over and over but the left sure likes to beat a dead horse. Without the Dossier, there never would have been Crossfire Hurricane, the Mueller investigation, or the Durham report. None of the democrats produced Trump scandals happen without corruption in the government and media.
 
You have a right to your own opinion but not your own facts. The fact is that every investigation concluded that Russia interfered with the 2016 election on Trump's behalf and Trump's campaign was active in that interference.
"Russia, if you're listening."
It's funny when the left is still using the same bullshit Russia narrative after its all been exposed as fake. Look up Clinton Intelligence Plan.



Brennan’s handwritten note:


1000008890.webp
 
It's pretty well known the the intelligence agencies will go a long way to protect themselves an covering up their actions or screwups is certainly part of all that. How often have we actually be told the "truth" concerning America scandals in our politics? Most of America still believes the government explanation of the JFK assassination is total bullshit and the government has never done anything but continued to make Americans feel that way. That's just one high profile case of BS. More recently we have seen strong evidence to support that we were lied to about, Trump Russian Collusion, Biden family pay for play, Democrats involved in improper handling of classified materials, exaggeration in the Climate Chaos position by democrats and of course everything about Covid.
The intelligence agencies foreign and domestic are some of the most evil organizations in the world.
 
You think the NYT that pushed the bullshit Russia collusion narrative, Joe Biden is fine cognitively and Saddam had WMD discredits declassified Obama administration documents? Seriously?
I love how you trust sources that have had far more reports of falsifying their data while dismissing other sources that have had far fewer. Thank you for your entertainment value.
 
I love how you trust sources that have had far more reports of falsifying their data while dismissing other sources that have had far fewer. Thank you for your entertainment value.
Which ones pushed the Hillary created Russia collusion hoax and which ones didn't?
 
You think Trump's business connections in Russia is somehow proof of the Hillary created Russia collusion hoax? You are grasping at straws.

His lie is proof that he wanted to hide his connections to Putin and Russia. That was her campaign platform. She questioned the allegiance and loyalty of trump to our nation. Look at everything he's done since. His actions since 2016 have been confirming evidence that he favors Putin. Clinton was right about Trump and Russia.

He lied to deceive voters so that they would not know he actually did have connections to Russia. I believe the voters deserved to know.But trump lied in order to hide the truth.
 
The Steele Dossier was used as the background story for investigating Trump. It was fake and they all knew it was fake. It's been debunked over and over but the left sure likes to beat a dead horse. Without the Dossier, there never would have been Crossfire Hurricane, the Mueller investigation, or the Durham report. None of the democrats produced Trump scandals happen without corruption in the government and media.

And which conclusions in the December 9 meeting, or the subsequent ICA on January 6, 2017 or any other committee or investigation were made based on the Steele dossier as a source?
 
His lie is proof that he wanted to hide his connections to Putin and Russia. That was her campaign platform. She questioned the allegiance and loyalty of trump to our nation. Look at everything he's done since. His actions since 2016 have been confirming evidence that he favors Putin. Clinton was right about Trump and Russia.

He lied to deceive voters so that they would not know he actually did have connections to Russia. I believe the voters deserved to know.But trump lied in order to hide the truth.
 
Everything he posted was accurate. If you don't think it was point out specifically what you think wasn't. I bet you won't.


Hard evidence? Whats that mean? Did he prove it in a court of law? Nope so that claim is meaningless.

"According to the US Intelligence Community"

Do you think its 2014? You know nobody falls for that shit anymore after the Russia collusion hoax right?
So you trust the biggest liar in Presidential history over our own intelligence experts? You think a pedophile and convicted felon is trustworthy? 🤣 🤣 🤣
The American people disagree and in the latest Gallup poll Trump's approval reached a new low and only 29% of independants now approve of Trump.

Independents Drive Trump's Approval to 37% Second-Term Low​

https://news.gallup.com/poll/692879/independents-drive-trump-approval-second-term-low.aspx

A Linguistic Look at the World’s Most Prolific Liar

Not only is the 45th President of the USA the most famous liar in the world today, he is also, by far, the most prolific among world leaders. In November 2017, the New York Times listed well over 150 lies told by President Trump since he had taken office, in January 2017. In those days, that seemed like a lot, and each of those lies was meticulously documented and fact-checked using multiple sources, including Politifact, Factcheck.org, The Washington Post Fact Checker, and the Toronto Star. However, the presidential lying has grown exponentially this year. As Professor Paul Street wrote in October 2018, in an article titled, Trump’s Endless Mendacity and the Dawn of American Fascism: “The president lies as freely as he breathes.”

By May 2018, more than “3,000 untrue or misleading statements in 466 days in office” had been counted, which is the equivalent of six to seven such statements every single day. The Toronto Star also reported a figure of “3084 false things Donald Trump has said as U.S. president” between January 20, 2017 and October 23, 2018. By then, the President had made so many false statements that the Toronto Star organized them alphabetically into well over one hundred categories from “Afghanistan”, “Barack Obama” and “Brent Kavanagh” to “Vladimir Putin” and “Xi Jinping”.

https://think.iafor.org/a-linguistic-look-at-the-worlds-most-prolific-liar/
 
Last edited:
So you trust the biggest liar in Presidential history over our own intelligence experts? You think a pedophile is trustworthy? 🤣 🤣 🤣

A Linguistic Look at the World’s Most Prolific Liar

Not only is the 45th President of the USA the most famous liar in the world today, he is also, by far, the most prolific among world leaders. In November 2017, the New York Times listed well over 150 lies told by President Trump since he had taken office, in January 2017. In those days, that seemed like a lot, and each of those lies was meticulously documented and fact-checked using multiple sources, including Politifact, Factcheck.org, The Washington Post Fact Checker, and the Toronto Star. However, the presidential lying has grown exponentially this year. As Professor Paul Street wrote in October 2018, in an article titled, Trump’s Endless Mendacity and the Dawn of American Fascism: “The president lies as freely as he breathes.”

By May 2018, more than “3,000 untrue or misleading statements in 466 days in office” had been counted, which is the equivalent of six to seven such statements every single day. The Toronto Star also reported a figure of “3084 false things Donald Trump has said as U.S. president” between January 20, 2017 and October 23, 2018. By then, the President had made so many false statements that the Toronto Star organized them alphabetically into well over one hundred categories from “Afghanistan”, “Barack Obama” and “Brent Kavanagh” to “Vladimir Putin” and “Xi Jinping”.

https://think.iafor.org/a-linguistic-look-at-the-worlds-most-prolific-liar/
Intelligence experts? I don't believe any Intelligence official that dont provide proof of their claims. There were so many supposed bombshell Russia stories based on anonymous intelligence officials that later were exposed as complete BS.
 
Who cares which websites Dave Van Zandt thinks are biased or not? Do you think because he created his own website that he's the authority on bias?

The lefties here think Mediabiasfactcheck is some magic silver bullet that automatically discredits an article you don't like without you ever showing if anything is inaccurate.
The Federalist makes no attempt at even appearing unbiased regardless of how it's rated by that website. Just reading the paragraphs you quote is hilarious. Obama's "jackboot henchmen"? How can you even pretend that anyone should take this website seriously?
 
Intelligence experts? I don't believe any Intelligence official that dont provide proof of their claims. There were so many supposed bombshell Russia stories based on anonymous intelligence officials that later were exposed as complete BS.
No there weren't. You are being lied to. You must love lies. There is plenty of proof and Trump's own words are included. Just look at him praising a Russian FSB front.

 
His lie is proof that he wanted to hide his connections to Putin and Russia.
😆
That was her campaign platform. She questioned the allegiance and loyalty of trump to our nation. Look at everything he's done since. His actions since 2016 have been confirming evidence that he favors Putin. Clinton was right about Trump and Russia.
The Hillary created Russia collusion hoax lives on through liberals who have been so propagandized that they think its still true even after it being exposed as complete BS.
He lied to deceive voters so that they would not know he actually did have connections to Russia. I believe the voters deserved to know.But trump lied in order to hide the truth.
You are reaching. It must be hard to come to grips with the Clinton Intelligence Plan being exposed as the Russia collusion hoax.
 
No there weren't. You are being lied to. You must love lies. There is plenty of proof and Trump's own words are included. Just look at him praising a Russian FSB front.


Trump was supposedly a secret agent working for Putin. As all secret agents do, Trump decided to communicate an important message to Putin, not through secret back channels, but at a televised press conference. 🤣🤣🤣
 
The Federalist makes no attempt at even appearing unbiased regardless of how it's rated by that website. Just reading the paragraphs you quote is hilarious. Obama's "jackboot henchmen"? How can you even pretend that anyone should take this website seriously?
Why don't you point out what's inaccurate in that article if its so bad?
 
Trump was supposedly a secret agent working for Putin. As all secret agents do, Trump decided to communicate an important message to Putin, not through secret back channels, but at a televised press conference. 🤣🤣🤣
So committing treason on live TV makes it OK? :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
The OP is completely discredited by what the NYT published yesterday.

New Reports on Russian Interference Don’t Show What Trump Says They Do

The assessment said that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had ordered a multifaceted information operation targeting the U.S. presidential election, including by hacking and releasing Democratic emails and by seeding social media with messages promoting Mr. Trump and denigrating his rival, Hillary Clinton.

The assessment also attributed three motivations to Mr. Putin. Two have not been seriously challenged: He wanted to undermine public faith in democracy and to damage Mrs. Clinton, who until election night was widely seen as the next U.S. president. But Mr. Trump and his allies have long chafed at the third asserted goal — that Russia also hoped to help him win.

The reports released by the Trump team are limited to evaluating the use of intelligence that was available in December 2016, and do not address subsequent developments. That includes Mr. Putin’s statement at a news conference with Mr. Trump in Helsinki, Finland, in 2018, in which he said through a translator that he had indeed wanted Mr. Trump to win the election “because he talked about bringing the U.S.-Russia relationship back to normal.”

Others who have had access to the previously classified information and files from that period have reached different conclusions.

John Durham, a special counsel appointed in Mr. Trump’s first term who hunted for a basis to fault the actions of law enforcement and intelligence officials early in that investigation, already scrutinized the drafting of the 2017 intelligence assessment and did not criticize anything about it in his final report.

And in a five-volume 2020 report, the Republican-controlled Senate Intelligence Committee — led by then-Senator Marco Rubio, a Florida Republican who is now Mr. Trump’s secretary of state and national security adviser — reached its own conclusion that Russia’s motivations had included aspiring to improve Mr. Trump’s chances of winning.

What is wild about all of this is that they want us to basically ignore everything that we have learned in the period between this assessment and now.

They are using the reality warping magic spell again and trying to speak an alternate history into existence.
 
Its all connected and its all falling apart.
 
Back
Top Bottom