George Zimmerman just lost his PR position. Basically everyone will now drop him like a hot potato.
Shooting someone in self defense and then him used as a political tool is one thing. Going over to his wife who has filed for divorce and her father and acting like an asshole is another. Curiously, no charges are filed against him, but this is the incident that will destroy his reputation to everyone.
You are jumping to conclusions without knowing, the full story
Disagreements happen on all marriages.....to say that *his reputation* will be destroyed by this... is simply ridiculous
Why are you lying again?That's a lot of wind just to deny you were hiding behind someone else's post. :roll:
That is a lie huh?did you see his new posted lie?
he said he edited his post before my reply, ive never seen such dishonesty posted in an attempt to save face
That would be you.why do you continue to lie?
And?this was your statment
"Obviously the part where you are wrong."
Wrong as usual.you were 100% wrong and posting lies about doesnt change anythign thatw why your post got destroryed by me and others
Wrong!it is also a lie to say you edited before i posted, if that was true then your original words would not be in my quote.
:naughtyyou lose to facts again, nice try bit its another fail for you LMAO you are so busted
I have already posted what you were wrong about.if you disagree by all means use FACTS and prove otherwise now, we'd love to read them
man up , stop dodging the question and post what "I" was wrong about in your next post
You are the only one who has been dodging.how much does anybody want to bet his next post is another dodge?
AGENT J said:I'm kind of a big deal
BOOM! i sooo called it, i said your next post would be another dodgeWhy are you lying again?
I hid behind nobodies post.
Hell, by making the accusation, you have even shown you do not know what it means.
That is a lie huh?
Prove it then.
Prove it wasn't edited before you posted. You can't because it was posted before you made your reply.
You may have hit the quote button before it was edited, but you did not post (hit the submit button) before my edit was posted.
So this is just one of your many lies.
That would be you.
And?
Even though this is what we have been arguing because you were wrong by virtue of what you posted, it was also changed before you posted.
Wrong as usual.
And the lies are yours.
Wrong!
I was already in the process of editing when you quoted. My edit was posted before your reply was. Which is why it isn't reflected.
But you have been here long enough to know all this.
So you aren't just mistaken, but are engaged in purposeful lying.
:naughty
No.
Get the facts straight.
You are the one who has lost to the facts, lied, deflected and dodged, and are busted for it.
I have already posted what you were wrong about.
You were wrong by virtue of what you provided. You know that is what my argument has been since I first stated it.
You were wrong because what you provided was wrong.
How many time do you need to be told that?
And again!
Bottom line is, what you provided was wrong because Shelli lied. She never saw a firearm.
You do not get to hide behind the article by saying it is what they said when you are the one who provided it.
You are the only one who has been dodging.
Dodging their being wrong by virtue of what they provided.
I am not wrong for pointing that out. Nor is it a dodge, but what has become the main point.
So stop lying.
And pay attention:
Maybe next time when you are asked "really", you will understand that means that there is other information out there that you should make yourself aware of, instead of deflecting with all your absurdities.
:laughat:
More lies I see.BOOM! i sooo called it, i said your next post would be another dodge
translation: you have no facts to back up the lie you posted, ill keep waiting, post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting
More lies I see.
Well you are wrong.
Apparently I called it.
Just more lies, deflection, and dodging from you.
:dohtranslation: you have no facts to back up the lie you posted, ill keep waiting, post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting
:laughat:
:doh
Apparently you can't translate either.
And again!
Bottom line is, what you provided was wrong because Shelli lied. She never saw a firearm.
What we have here folks is J attempting to change the argument.
He knows what the argument is.
He is wrong by virtue of what he provided.
He is trying to hide behind the fact that he didn't actually make the false claim.
The problem with that is that he provided it.
That is what is and was claimed.
He is wrong by virtue of what he provided.
Sorry J, you don't get to change the argument.
You are wrong by virtue of what you provided.
As previously and continuously stated.
And pay attention:
Maybe next time when you are asked "really", you will understand that means that there is other information out there that you should make yourself aware of, instead of deflecting with all your absurdities
Why are you lying again?
I hid behind nobodies post.
Hell, by making the accusation, you have even shown you do not know what it means.
That is a lie huh?
Prove it then.
Prove it wasn't edited before you posted. You can't because it was posted before you made your reply.
You may have hit the quote button before it was edited, but you did not post (hit the submit button) before my edit was posted.
So this is just one of your many lies.
That would be you.
And?
Even though this is what we have been arguing because you were wrong by virtue of what you posted, it was also changed before you posted.
Wrong as usual.
And the lies are yours.
Wrong!
I was already in the process of editing when you quoted. My edit was posted before your reply was. Which is why it isn't reflected.
But you have been here long enough to know all this.
So you aren't just mistaken, but are engaged in purposeful lying.
:naughty
No.
Get the facts straight.
You are the one who has lost to the facts, lied, deflected and dodged, and are busted for it.
I have already posted what you were wrong about.
You were wrong by virtue of what you provided. You know that is what my argument has been since I first stated it.
You were wrong because what you provided was wrong.
How many time do you need to be told that?
And again!
Bottom line is, what you provided was wrong because Shelli lied. She never saw a firearm.
You do not get to hide behind the article by saying it is what they said when you are the one who provided it.
You are the only one who has been dodging.
Dodging their being wrong by virtue of what they provided.
I am not wrong for pointing that out. Nor is it a dodge, but what has become the main point.
So stop lying.
And pay attention:
Maybe next time when you are asked "really", you will understand that means that there is other information out there that you should make yourself aware of, instead of deflecting with all your absurdities.
:laughat:
:doh :doh :dohYour continued denial does not change the fact that you were hiding behind another's post. You even said yourself that you were not hiding because you suggested you did not know if the claim was true or not -- so I posted links to several of your posts where you did not offer such an inquiry. So even by your idiotic excuse that you weren't hiding because you pondered, "if..." you were hiding behind his posts before you said, "if..." And that's by your standard, as pathetically lame as it is. :roll:
We are still laughing at your silly dodges and deflections.translation: you have no facts to back up the lie you posted, we will keep waiting, post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting, its hilarious you cant
facts destroy you again
Funny!post a link showing where i was factually wrong
[...], its hilarious you cant
:laughat:
We are still laughing at your silly dodges and deflections.
Yep folks. He is still dodging and deflecting because he can't admit to being wrong.
He knows what the argument is.
He is wrong by virtue of what he provided.
He is trying to hide behind the fact that he didn't actually make the false claim.
The problem with that is that he provided it.
That is what is and was claimed.
He is wrong by virtue of what he provided.
Funny!
Although that is and was not my argument, but that to which you are trying to change it (Which ain't gonna happen.), I have already shown where you were factually wrong about saying I was lying and showed how you were wrong about my editing of my own post.
Keep plugging J, maybe some day you will be right.
yep, he died posts ago its obvious to everyone but him
BTW i love that movie, got it on DVD
Now you're lying to cover up for your hiding behind another's post. Your use of "if" came after you made multiple posts without specifying "if." So even if one accepts your inane excuse that using "if" absolves you of hiding behind another's post in lieu of citing actual sources, as ridiculous as that is ... you still hid behind his post without questioning its veracity before you finally did.:doh :doh :doh
You really have a hard time paying attention to that which has come before.
This claim/argument of yours was already shown to be wrong/a lie, because I did make inquiry in those posts.
The last just being a continuation of this discussion where it was already established as an "If".
You have nothing other than false assertions.
I still get a good laugh at how you continue squawk back to others what they first say to you, like a parrot.:laughat:
We are still laughing at your silly dodges and deflections.
nope thats why we are laughing at your failed post and the lie you posted.
That is why I am laughing at your postings and your attempt to be dishonest.
we have been laughing and waiting, its hilarious you cant facts destroy you again
We are still laughing at your silly dodges and deflections.
Translation: Dodge and deflection by Agent J.translation: you still have no facts to back up the lie you posted, we will keep waiting. Post a link showing where i was factually wrong
we have been laughing and waiting, its hilarious you cant
facts destroy you again
And?I still get a good laugh at how you continue squawk back to others what they first say to you, like a parrot.
And?
What they say applies to them.
So it is applicable.
I still get a good laugh at how you continue squawk back to others what they first say to you, like a parrot.
:lamo :lamo :lamo
Translation: Dodge and deflection by Agent J.
You are still lying.
The facts have already been provided.
I'm sure I'm not the only noticing how he is refusing to do that.Post a link showing where i was factually wrong
I'm sure I'm not the only noticing how he is refusing to do that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?