Yes, France is suggesting they won't rule out that option.Just to clarify is someone suggesting that the UN "create" a state in the sense of recognizing borders of a state, regardless of what the political reality is, and giving them a regular seat in the UN?
Palestine already has observer status in the UN.Or are we just talking about giving Palestine a seat in the UN as a normal state would have?
Well, this way there is no more Israeli procrastination that only serves to build more settlements. Of course, Israel has never obliged by any UN Security Council Resolution, completely contrary to Article 25 of the UN Charter.And how would anyone think either of these two are a solution?
It's a good thing France won't rule it out. Palestinians are all saved now.
Of course prior to the Suez War, France was chief weapon's importer to Israel after the Soviets bailed and started providing for the Arabs. Then there was the whole Muslim Algerian torture campaign. And who can forget their love affair for Saddam Hussein? And let's not forget the Muslim riots inside France recently. So....not sure what France is trying to pretend here.
What does anything you mentioned above have to do with the actual topic at hand?
Well, it demonstrates the joke of France thinking that Muslims any where in this region cares or trusts what they think.
Well, obviously someone cared enough to interview the French Foreign Minister. All you did was post rhetoric that has little to do with the actual topic.
If I see a thread about America having one month to get the peace talks back on track, does that mean I can bash America and say no one should care or trust what America thinks?
It's rhetoric that's irrelevant to the topic.It's "rhetoric" that trumps any BS French sentiment about Palestine. You can grovel and place faith in it, but I see through it. And what nation's military do you think France's "UN Security Action" will assume the duty? I have an idea. America should task all the European players that created this mess with the responsibility of resolving it.
I don't recall the entire world looking towards America for anything. What did the entire world say to America about Iraq? The entire world was asking America to invade Iraq? The UN asked America to invade Iraq?No, you cannot since it has been America that the entire world has looked towards for almost 40 years to solely find a solution for a mess it did not create. In the end, Europeans, Palestinians, and Israelis are responsible for this. We are merely left holding the bag and all the hate and anti-Americansim that comes with it.
It's rhetoric that's irrelevant to the topic.
What does France being Israel's chief arms supplier before the Suez War have to do with France and the creation of a Palestinian state from a Security Council Resolution?
Nothing.
3 sentences bashing France for small things your own country does as well is not a relevant portrayal of French history.Well, I'll go ahead and repeat exactly what I already stated for you. I believe it is relevent because it portrays France's actual history and demonstrates how empty their sentiments are towards any Palestinian future.
It's obvious when a discussion is over. One poster will end up resorting to ad hominem arguments in the hopes of salvaging poorly thought posts.But maybe you should write out exactly what is and is not relevent as decided by Degreez. We wouldn't want others to steer off your pattern of what is and is not relevent.
I don't recall the entire world looking towards America for anything.
What did the entire world say to America about Iraq? The entire world was asking America to invade Iraq? The UN asked America to invade Iraq?
And America has some blame in the whole conflict. Blocking resolutions that would force Israel to actually comply with international law. Billions in aid and incentives. Israel is the only recipient of foreign military financing from America that does not have to use all the funds on purchases from the United States. It can spend 25% of the billions it receives on domestic projects. No other nation has that opportunity. George Marshall was right when he warned Truman that America would help "destabilize the region".
French FM Bernard Kouchner says that France prefers a two-state solution negotiated with Israel but the option of UN Security Council action remains on the table....
French FM Bernard Kouchner says that France prefers a two-state solution negotiated with Israel but the option of UN Security Council action remains on the table.
French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner has said that it is impossible to rule out the option of the United Nations Security Council creating a Palestinian state, French news agency AFP on Sunday quoted a Palestinian newspaper as saying.
According to the report, Kouchner told the Al-Ayyam newspaper that France prefers a two-state solution negotiated with Israel but that the Security Council option remains on the table.
We want to be able to soon welcome the state of Palestine to the United Nations," Kouchner is quoted as saying. "This is the hope and the desire of the international community, and the sooner that can happen the better
Report: France 'won't rule out' UN creation of Palestinian state - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?