• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Repealing the 2nd

Well.. I guess we learn from the fellows like yourself that argue.."why can't a guy have NUCLEAR WEAPON".

however..

Your argument IS that if its easy.. then its okay as a law.

So. Do you support a gps tracker being implanted in you to help the government save lives.

Yes or no.

If not.. why not.

Please post where I said "why can't a guy have a nuclear weapon". Exact post number please. If you make a claim about me....back it up or retract it.
 
Please post where I said "why can't a guy have a nuclear weapon". Exact post number please. If you make a claim about me....back it up or retract it.

Answer the question Vegas.. stop diverting.

So. Do you support a gps tracker being implanted in you to help the government save lives.

Yes or no.

If not.. why not.
 
Answer the question Vegas.. stop diverting.

So. Do you support a gps tracker being implanted in you to help the government save lives.

Yes or no.

If not.. why not.

Back up your claim. Can I say you said, "My name is jaeger19 and I want to ban all guns in the US." Is it ok if I spread that claim?
 
Back up your claim. Can I say you said, "My name is jaeger19 and I want to ban all guns in the US." Is it ok if I spread that claim?

Go ahead.. its a lie.. but I don't expect any less of you vegas.

WE ALL KNOW that you have spent time arguing that since the federal government has limits to what a person can own..like a "nuclear weapon".. it means that they can limit arms such as firearms. So stop trying to divert the conversation.

I am not searching thousands of posts simply to yet again prove me right and you wrong.

So answer the question again:

So. Do you support a gps tracker being implanted in you to help the government save lives.

Yes or no.

If not.. why not.


.
 
Go ahead.. its a lie.. but I don't expect any less of you vegas.

WE ALL KNOW that you have spent time arguing that since the federal government has limits to what a person can own..like a "nuclear weapon".. it means that they can limit arms such as firearms. So stop trying to divert the conversation.

I am not searching thousands of posts simply to yet again prove me right and you wrong.

So answer the question again:

So. Do you support a gps tracker being implanted in you to help the government save lives.

Yes or no.

If not.. why not.


.

Why do you need my answer? If you are going to lie about me make up any answer you want and then claim I said it. You don't need me to finish out your hilariously paranoid delusion.
 
Do you support a gps tracker being implanted in you to help the government save lives.

Yes or no.

If not.. why not.

Why do you need my answer? If you are going to lie about me make up any answer you want and then claim I said it. You don't need me to finish out your hilariously paranoid delusion.

I love how the vast majority of liberals can't (or simply refuse to) answer simple questions such as this one and provide some sort of logical reasoning behind their positions...

I'll show you how easy it is to do...

No, I do not support a GPS tracker being implanted into me to aid the government in saving lives because I value my privacy and I don't want the government to be watching my every move (although social media, cell phones, Google, and etc. already walk a fine line with this, if they haven't already crossed that line). Also, from a federal government standpoint, I would think that this type of proposition would directly conflict with the Fourth Amendment, thus another reason why I do not support it.

See how easy that was?! Now you give it a go, Mr. Vegas...
 
Why do you need my answer? If you are going to lie about me make up any answer you want and then claim I said it. You don't need me to finish out your hilariously paranoid delusion.


Another diversion.
 
I love how the vast majority of liberals can't (or simply refuse to) answer simple questions such as this one and provide some sort of logical reasoning behind their positions...

I'll show you how easy it is to do...

No, I do not support a GPS tracker being implanted into me to aid the government in saving lives because I value my privacy and I don't want the government to be watching my every move (although social media, cell phones, Google, and etc. already walk a fine line with this, if they haven't already crossed that line). Also, from a federal government standpoint, I would think that this type of proposition would directly conflict with the Fourth Amendment, thus another reason why I do not support it.

See how easy that was?! Now you give it a go, Mr. Vegas...

So true. Its one of those disconnects... the same liberals that don't want the government deciding whether they can own weed or not.. or whether they have to provide ID to vote.. or a myriad of other intrusions on people...

then blatantly cry "its just a form".. and "why worry about the government".. when it comes to guns.

The same government that they complain will abuse people's right to vote if they have to provide ID...

they then claim that same government WOULD NEVER abuse peoples second amendment rights when it forces you to register your weapons.
 
Its no big deal. And you could register all your guns at once simply. Somehow....I don't know how....but somehow....you will survive
So if it's no big deal and he will survive ,you would have no objection picking up the bill? It's only money..."Somehow....I don't know how....but somehow....you will survive"
 
So true. Its one of those disconnects... the same liberals that don't want the government deciding whether they can own weed or not.. or whether they have to provide ID to vote.. or a myriad of other intrusions on people...

then blatantly cry "its just a form".. and "why worry about the government".. when it comes to guns.

The same government that they complain will abuse people's right to vote if they have to provide ID...

they then claim that same government WOULD NEVER abuse peoples second amendment rights when it forces you to register your weapons.
vg will never answer the question. Even though it's JUST a question and it won't hurt him/her. NOW if the question were about firearms he/she would be all over it. And like you I won't sift through a gazillion post looking for his nonsense about nukes. But I'm pretty sure he chimed in with his BBs (ban buddies).
 
So if it's no big deal and he will survive ,you would have no objection picking up the bill? It's only money..."Somehow....I don't know how....but somehow....you will survive"

Uh....who picks up the bill for your car registration? Daddy?
 
So true. Its one of those disconnects... the same liberals that don't want the government deciding whether they can own weed or not.. or whether they have to provide ID to vote.. or a myriad of other intrusions on people...

then blatantly cry "its just a form".. and "why worry about the government".. when it comes to guns.

The same government that they complain will abuse people's right to vote if they have to provide ID...

they then claim that same government WOULD NEVER abuse peoples second amendment rights when it forces you to register your weapons.

Its just a form....somehow you will survive
 
Back
Top Bottom