• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Redeeming Trump Qualities.

Maybe youd like to share who you'll be supporting who can beat Donald Trump in 2020. Hating Republicans is easy... winning back the WH, not so much.

Which baby killer are you pulling for?

I do not know yet as its a bit early and I am not sure Trump will even be eligible to run at that point. I usually tend to think things through before acting....you should try it.
 
I do not know yet as its a bit early and I am not sure Trump will even be eligible to run at that point. I usually tend to think things through before acting....you should try it.
Understandable, but I'd suggest you try to get over 2016 and start worrying about 2020. As it stands now, the Dems havent found their next Obama and theyre gonna need one to unseat Trump.

3d96145969efe0f8a405f9e9e7ffe919.jpg
 
He is your guy, he isn't mine. Post Trump, how are yall going to lecture everyone on morals and having Christian politicians and all that other bull**** the right has been going on about for 50 years?

The only redeeming quality of Trump is he has shown everyone in the world just how much of a bunch of power hungry hypocrites the religious right and social conservatives are.
What part of former billionaire playboy came as a surprise to you? We knew he had a past with the ladies when we voted for him. But it is amusing being lectured on morals by the party of baby killers.
 
Understandable, but I'd suggest you try to get over 2016 and start worrying about 2020. As it stands now, the Dems havent found their next Obama and theyre gonna need one to unseat Trump.

The only thing I am not over about the last election is not voting for HillBill and thus being part of electing the most unethical and least competent President in our history. Even though she had the most actual votes and my state would NEVER have gone her way regardless I will NOT make that mistake again and will probably vote Dem for the first time to do my part in rebuilding the credibility and respect our nation once had. I do not really care who the Dems pick in the end because whoever it is will get my vote if Uncle Donny is running....I doubt he will be.

Smart Republicans should be trying to figure out who THEY will be running instead of hiding from the impending boot drop.
 
What part of former billionaire playboy came as a surprise to you? We knew he had a past with the ladies when we voted for him. But it is amusing being lectured on morals by the party of baby killers.

Really? So what you are saying is that despite having the choice of what, more than a dozen Republican primary candidates, more Republicans came out to vote for a man that is a pathological liar, narcissist, that by his own admission did not participate in the raising of his own kids, that has had 3 wives, all of which married him for money, that was out sleeping with pornstars when he had a baby at home, that has bragged about sexual assault, and that of course ran the most bigoted campaign since George Wallace - the last one is what I am pretty sure you guys love about him more than anything else. This man now enjoys stronger support among evangelicals than any president ever. Think about that. Evangelicals like him even more than they did Reagan or W.

Personally, I am an atheist. Donald Trump is the best thing to happen to atheism since modern science. I say this because most people don't leave religion because of conflicts between religious belief and science. There are plenty of conflicts between religious belief and modern science, but that's not what creates most atheists. What causes most people to leave the church is hypocrisy and in that regard, Trump may well end up creating more American atheists than any man in the history of the country.
 
Really? So what you are saying is that despite having the choice of what, more than a dozen Republican primary candidates, more Republicans came out to vote for a man that is a pathological liar, narcissist, that by his own admission did not participate in the raising of his own kids, that has had 3 wives, all of which married him for money, that was out sleeping with pornstars when he had a baby at home, that has bragged about sexual assault, and that of course ran the most bigoted campaign since George Wallace - the last one is what I am pretty sure you guys love about him more than anything else. This man now enjoys stronger support among evangelicals than any president ever. Think about that. Evangelicals like him even more than they did Reagan or W.

Personally, I am an atheist. Donald Trump is the best thing to happen to atheism since modern science. I say this because most people don't leave religion because of conflicts between religious belief and science. There are plenty of conflicts between religious belief and modern science, but that's not what creates most atheists. What causes most people to leave the church is hypocrisy and in that regard, Trump may well end up creating more American atheists than any man in the history of the country.
An atheist, you say? What a surprise. No wonder you vote for baby killers.
266aa105119c4c4a781c4e703dd6ec86.jpg
 
The only thing I am not over about the last election is not voting for HillBill and thus being part of electing the most unethical and least competent President in our history. Even though she had the most actual votes and my state would NEVER have gone her way regardless I will NOT make that mistake again and will probably vote Dem for the first time to do my part in rebuilding the credibility and respect our nation once had. I do not really care who the Dems pick in the end because whoever it is will get my vote if Uncle Donny is running....I doubt he will be.

Smart Republicans should be trying to figure out who THEY will be running instead of hiding from the impending boot drop.
Impending... since 2016? So silly you guys are still holding onto that fantasy. Even Pelosi is crawfishing.
d03a819742ceaf17dabee26b36458b22.jpg
 
The left doesn't want to talk about any of that. They want to concentrate on Trump's moral character.

Would you want your children or grand children to embrace Trump's 'morals' ?. Do you sit them down and advise them to embrace those 'morals' ? Do you tell them it is OK to grab women's private parts, or allow others to grab their private parts ? How about cheating on wives? Do you tell them that is OK ? Or , how about trying to abort your very own daughter, as Trump begged Marla Maples to do with his own love child, Tiffany ?... (conceived by a mistress while he was married to his first wife) ? Do you tell them that doesn't matter as long as the economy is doing well ? Or do you tell them it's all about money, and the President's 'morals' don't matter, nor do they negatively reflect on the U.S. as seen by the rest of the world ?
 
No matter what the Democrat presidential ticket is, they shall receive my vote.

For the midterms, I voted straight Democrat. First time ever. I don't see myself voting Republican again for a long, long, damn long time.
 
No matter what the Democrat presidential ticket is, they shall receive my vote.

For the midterms, I voted straight Democrat. First time ever. I don't see myself voting Republican again for a long, long, damn long time.

That is almost a bizzaro coincidence! I plan to vote for Republican's down the line
Regards,
CP
 
The piece refrains from explaining why white southerners began to vote republican and why black southerners began to vote democrat after generations. LBJ predicted that the democrats would lose the south. Why? Whites there voted for Goldwater who opposed civil rights legislation. Why? Reagan has one of his first 1980 campaign stops and proclaimed his belief in states rights in Mississippi. Why? Maybe there was no “orchestration”, but there certainly was a strategy. Or maybe all this was coincidence following a series of legislative victories in civil rights.

The question is answered in detail with back and forth.



1930s was new deal in which there was a switch to democrat voting for blacks because FDR offered the new deal benefits which excluded most anyway. 15% to a whopping 70% in four years.

How Blacks became Blue: The 1936 African American Voting Shift From the Party of Lincoln to the New Deal Coalition

This one is interesting as well.
 
Fact check: false. History began on January 20, 2017. Before that time, there was no economy, no fire, no firmaments and we pooped in our dinner plates. There was, however, one thing that did happen before that date: Hillary Clinton gave all our nuclear weapons to Russia in the Plutonium One scandal.

Best laugh I've had all day!

:lamo :lamo :lamo

Thanks a million, I needed a grand chuckle!
 
Trump is the enemy of the American people. He must be removed by any means available to the American people ASAP.

He has no redeeming features. He is the devil.
 
Trump is the enemy of the American people. He must be removed by any means available to the American people ASAP.

He has no redeeming features. He is the devil.

:lamo:fueltofir:cuckoo::failpail:
 
The left doesn't want to talk about any of that. They want to concentrate on Trump's moral character.

BS. Your posts are filled with BS. The reality is Trump inherited a solid economy and most of the things on the list you credit with for Trump are credited to Obama.
 
An atheist, you say? What a surprise. No wonder you vote for baby killers.
266aa105119c4c4a781c4e703dd6ec86.jpg

baby killers? Your hero Trump was "pro choice" until he became "pro life" when it became politically convenient for him. Who are you trying to kid?
 
An atheist, you say? What a surprise. No wonder you vote for baby killers.
266aa105119c4c4a781c4e703dd6ec86.jpg

Prayer has never left the White House.

The only babies killed by any American President have been babies killed as part of "acceptable collateral damage" committed by our military in Commander in Chief ordered acts.

Just like Obama, and Bush, and Clinton, and Bush and Reagan and on down the line our current President has the blood of innocents on his hands so they damned well better be saying prayers in the White House, prayers beseeching our Lord for forgiveness!
 
AN HISTORICAL KEY TO WHAT HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF THE GREAT RECESSION

I didnt vote for Trump. I wont vote for him regardless of who runs in 2020. However my opinion of him is similar to that of my opinion of Bill Clinton. Dood has the morals of a ****ing sewer rat...but I want to see him successful for the good of the country. Anyone that doesnt is just a ****ing moron in my book.

We Yanks all really-'n-truly need a perspective lesson in Economic statistics and what happened during the Great Recession, which paved the way for its own resurrection from the ashes of a No New Jobs Economy. It's a sad bit of our history.

After the Replicant HofR (elected by 39% of the electorate in the 2010 midterms) refused any further stimulus spending to get the US out of the Great Recession, the Employment-to-population Ratio stagnated. (See that here from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.)

What happened specifically in the US is this:
*US banks had gouged on a free-for-all in realty lending without any qualifying basis for the loans made starting from the early 1980s. People were borrowing without any corroborative ability to pay the loans! Which were simply abolished and the property confiscated. (But the bad-loans continued to pile-up in terms of US overall debt!)
*The fit-hit-the-shan in 2008 when, as a parting gift of Georgie-Porgy, the Great Recession whacked America and unemployment started to sky-rocket. Wall Street had seen the debt-overhang piling up and suggested IN 2010 to its clients to sell-out. That MASSIVE debt-sellout helped spark the Great Recession.
*See a factual piece of evidence from the Bureau of Labor Statistics of plummeting unemployment, here: Situation - Employment-to-population Ratio.
*Obama, in the year following his entry into office as PotUS, got the Dem-run HofR to create and pass the ARRA-bill (2009) that effectively spiked an exploding unemployment rate at 10% and turned it around.
*What did only 37% of voting Americans do in the 2010 midterms? With consummate stoopidity, they voted control of the HofR over to the Replicants. Who officially pronounced cruelly that there would be NO FURTHER STIMULUS SPENDING. And why? Because they wanted Obama to lose the 2012-election due to high-unemployment and they did not give-a-damn about unemployment!
*Did they change their mind one-iota - that is, vote for some more stimulus-spending to reduce unemployment. NOPE!
*If you will look at the E-to-p Ratio linked above, no stimulus-spending meant that from November 2009 to February of 2014 NO ADDITIONAL JOBS WERE CREATED IN THE US.
*Finally, after five long and dreary years, simply tired of the situation, the American public finally rekindled Demand for goods/services and the E-to-p Ratio gradually improved.
*But from no help whatsoever from the Replicant Party!
*None, zilch, nothing - and just the opposite!

Did they win the next election for PotUS? Nope! Donald Dork lost that election!

So, how-the-hell did he become PotUS? By a bit of election trickery that is firmly planted in an early Amendment to the Constitution called the "Electoral College", one that manipulates and misrepresents the popular-vote for the Head of State.

Which no other developed democracy has ever adopted since ...
 
Last edited:
AN HISTORICAL KEY TO WHAT HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF THE GREAT RECESSION



We Yanks all really-'n-truly need a perspective lesson in Economic statistics and what happened during the Great Recession, which paved the way for its own resurrection from the ashes of a No New Jobs Economy. It's a sad bit of our history.

After the Replicant HofR (elected by 39% of the electorate in the 2010 midterms) refused any further stimulus spending to get the US out of the Great Recession, the Employment-to-population Ratio stagnated. (See that here from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.)

What happened specifically in the US is this:
*US banks had gouged on a free-for-all in realty lending without any qualifying basis for the loans made starting from the early 1980s. People were borrowing without any corroborative ability to pay the loans! Which were simply abolished and the property confiscated. (But the bad-loans continued to pile-up in terms of US overall debt!)
*The fit-hit-the-shan in 2008 when, as a parting gift of Georgie-Porgy, the Great Recession whacked America and unemployment started to sky-rocket. Wall Street had seen the debt-overhang piling up and suggested IN 2010 to its clients to sell-out. That MASSIVE debt-sellout helped spark the Great Recession.
*See a factual piece of evidence from the Bureau of Labor Statistics of plummeting unemployment, here: Situation - Employment-to-population Ratio.
*Obama, in the year following his entry into office as PotUS, got the Dem-run HofR to create and pass the ARRA-bill (2009) that effectively spiked an exploding unemployment rate at 10% and turned it around.
*What did only 37% of voting Americans do in the 2010 midterms? With consummate stoopidity, they voted control of the HofR over to the Replicants. Who officially pronounced cruelly that there would be NO FURTHER STIMULUS SPENDING. And why? Because they wanted Obama to lose the 2012-election due to high-unemployment and they did not give-a-damn about unemployment!
*Did they change their mind one-iota - that is, vote for some more stimulus-spending to reduce unemployment. NOPE!
*If you will look at the E-to-p Ratio linked above, no stimulus-spending meant that from November 2009 to February of 2014 NO ADDITIONAL JOBS WERE CREATED IN THE US.
*Finally, after five long and dreary years, simply tired of the situation, the American public finally rekindled Demand for goods/services and the E-to-p Ratio gradually improved.
*But from no help whatsoever from the Replicant Party!
*None, zilch, nothing - and just the opposite!

Did they win the next election for PotUS? Nope! Donald Dork lost that election!

So, how-the-hell did he become PotUS? By a bit of election trickery that is firmly planted in an early Amendment to the Constitution called the "Electoral College", one that manipulates and misrepresents the popular-vote for the Head of State.

Which no other developed democracy has ever adopted since ...
:lamo

Your ranting poutrage over the 'popular vote' is pathetic. It was and is well understood WHY there is an electoral college..and this last election gives the perfect example why. a small handful of states and in fact counties will not be allowed to dictate to the vast majority of states...no matter how many idiot leftists are in those states.
 
Redeeming qualities? ..... he doesn't drink.

Biggest flaws, he has isolated us from all of our closest allies and is in bed with our worst rivals all in the name of profit. Remember, the government that is our biggest advisory on the political stage want him to remain president. If the right wasn't so gleeful over making liberals cry and stopped to actually think instead of spouting rhetoric, maybe they'd realise just how damning this one fact is.

Overall, the best thing about him is that he is teaching the younger generation that there are people out there who do not care whether what they believe is true or not and most of those people identify as religious.
 
:lamo

Your ranting poutrage over the 'popular vote' is pathetic. It was and is well understood WHY there is an electoral college..and this last election gives the perfect example why. a small handful of states and in fact counties will not be allowed to dictate to the vast majority of states...no matter how many idiot leftists are in those states.

You apparently are ignorant of the fact that the Electoral College is employed for the election of a National Head of State - that "state" being the Federal Government.

Which further means this: The population of states - large or small - do not come into the consideration nationally. All that counts is reporting to Congress the full number of popular-votes by candidate!

Period. Except for those thoroughly ignorant of what is meant by the importance of the popular-vote and its need to be preserved at the national level by not the elimination of the Electoral College. Because it was devised by an Amendment at a time when nobody in America had the foggiest notion of how a national election should be conducted.

Meaning this: A national law stipulating that the popular-vote alone (and without further manipulation) is the only vote to be reported to Congress for the purpose of electing a PotUS! Therefore, that vote must be devoid of any further manipulation by a "winner-takes-all" vote of the EC as is presently the case.

Your ignorance of what consists a fair-and-honest vote is showing ...
 
Last edited:
baby killers? Your hero Trump was "pro choice" until he became "pro life" when it became politically convenient for him. Who are you trying to kid?
Sorry nothing personal. I assumed you plan to vote for baby killing Democrats. My bad if I assumed wrong... maybe you just wont vote, eh?
 
Back
Top Bottom