Hate to break it to you but that was before Perry even announced and was a June 29 poll, irrelevant. Guess you missed the tie today in the Gallup poll. Not surprising. For someone from TX you sure have a distorted view of TX
Right, because the residents of Texas didn't know who Perry was until he announced. :lol:
It's because the rightwingers know that their candidates are so weak that there's no reason to vote FOR them. The only way to justify their votes is as a vote AGAINST something, in this case Obama
You are just paving the way for Perry to be the front runner
Continue, my dear fellow
Really, I'm paving the way??? And here I thought I was just making a post at DP. WOW!!!
Tell me where did you get your crystal ball.
BTW it does seem Perry's popularity is sliding in Texas.
Its quite simple...really. The choice between the 2
Potus - we just need to spend a few more trillion dollars and everything will be hunky dory ( it will be fun watching Obama try and do it) or....
Perry - They tried to spend like a drunken whore out of this mess and all it got us is a mountain of debt...a cluster****, now it's time to try something else
Obama's policies has led us to this point and there is no way he escapes blame for it.
Pave away. Perry is much more beatable than Romney.
Obama economic results in 2011, .4% GDP and 1.3% GDP growth in 2011, 25+ million unemployed or under employed Americans in 2011, 4 trillion added to the debt in less than 3 years, and a downgrade of the U.S. credit rating. Rising Misery index 7.83 to 12.67. First President in U.S. History to have our credit downgraded on his watch! 40% JAR and well over 50% disapproval ratings.
Why would you want four more years of this
Correct me if I am wrong but when did GW Bush have 25 million unemployed and under employed? When did Bush have a downgrade of our credit? When did Bush add 4 trillion to the debt? When did Bush have such a rise in misery index? Amazing that liberals have no problem accepting these numbers after spending over a trillion dollars.
Why would you want four more years of this
Correct me if I am wrong but when did GW Bush have 25 million unemployed and under employed? When did Bush have a downgrade of our credit? When did Bush add 4 trillion to the debt? When did Bush have such a rise in misery index? Amazing that liberals have no problem accepting these numbers after spending over a trillion dollars.
....................
View attachment 67115172
Why would you want four more years of this
Correct me if I am wrong but when did GW Bush have 25 million unemployed and under employed? When did Bush have a downgrade of our credit? When did Bush add 4 trillion to the debt? When did Bush have such a rise in misery index? Amazing that liberals have no problem accepting these numbers after spending over a trillion dollars.
You're right -- Bush didn't add $4 trillion to the debt; he added SIX TRILLION the debt. His recession led to the debt downgrade and massive unemployment.
I think Obama needs to win because his policies are at least improving the situation, whereas the Republicans' policies would make the situation worse.
You're right -- Bush didn't add $4 trillion to the debt; he added SIX TRILLION the debt. His recession led to the debt downgrade and massive unemployment.
I think Obama needs to win because his policies are at least improving the situation, whereas the Republicans' policies would make the situation worse.
Amazing how those pesky little facts always get in the way of a liberal ideologue
Government - Historical Debt Outstanding – Annual
The numbers aren't important. Can't we all accept that both Obama and George Bush have added to our debt? That'd be a rational place to start instead of going back and forth, back and forth, back and forth.
What we need is someone who can fix this. The mainstream GOP proves time and time again that they spend lots and lots of money despite their constant proclamation of being good and fiscally conservative. The Dems continue to spend but at least say their going to spend. Both have proven themselves to be absolutely worthless.
Either way, what's the third choice? Are we out of choices?
Yep, those damn Obama results always get in the way of the liberal spin machine. It will be this record on the ballot in 2012 and liberals cannot accept that reality.
The numbers aren't important. Can't we all accept that both Obama and George Bush have added to our debt? That'd be a rational place to start instead of going back and forth, back and forth, back and forth.
What we need is someone who can fix this. The mainstream GOP proves time and time again that they spend lots and lots of money despite their constant proclamation of being good and fiscally conservative. The Dems continue to spend but at least say their going to spend. Both have proven themselves to be absolutely worthless.
Either way, what's the third choice? Are we out of choices?
It is not going to be "fixed" in four years no matter who is President.
Amazing how those pesky little facts always get in the way of a liberal ideologue
Government - Historical Debt Outstanding – Annual
The numbers aren't important. Can't we all accept that both Obama and George Bush have added to our debt? That'd be a rational place to start instead of going back and forth, back and forth, back and forth.
What we need is someone who can fix this. The mainstream GOP proves time and time again that they spend lots and lots of money despite their constant proclamation of being good and fiscally conservative. The Dems continue to spend but at least say their going to spend. Both have proven themselves to be absolutely worthless.
Either way, what's the third choice? Are we out of choices?
There's no question that they both added to the debt, but it's not an equivalent situation. Most of Obama's excess spending has been in response to a recession that he was saddled with. Most of Bush's debt was run up during a decent economy due to fiscal mismanagement.
Yes, I can and know that both have added to the debt. Bush with the help of a Democrat controlled Congress added to the debt and Obama in 3 years mostly with a Democrat Congress has added almost as much as Bush added in 8 years.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?