• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rand Paul names alleged whistleblower

HumblePi

HumblePi

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2018
Messages
29,120
Reaction score
22,722
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Moderate
Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul named the alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella and called for him to testify as part of the impeachment hearings.
During a Wednesday interview on Washington, D.C.-based WMAL, Paul was asked about a controversial remark he made last week when he called for the press to name the whistleblower but refused to do so himself. On Wednesday, Paul named Ciaramella and said he should be brought in to clarify whether he is indeed the whistleblower.
“I think Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony, and then I think it will be ultimately determined at that point,” said Paul. “But I think he is a person of interest in the sense that he was at the Ukraine desk when Joe Biden was there when Hunter Biden was working for the Ukrainian oligarch. So simply for that alone, I think he’s a material witness who needs to be brought in.”

Rand Paul names alleged whistleblower: ‘Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony’

---------------------------------------------------------

Rand Paul is human scum
 
Rand Paul is a worthless piece of crap on the bottom of an old shoe. His complete lack of respect for the law is obvious.
 
haymarket said:
Rand Paul is a worthless piece of crap on the bottom of an old shoe. His complete lack of respect for the law is obvious.
Click to expand...

You folks are really scared. Aren't you?
 
apdst said:
You folks are really scared. Aren't you?
Click to expand...

Why should they be scared? Everything the whistleblower claimed was corroborated by others.
 
apdst said:
You folks are really scared. Aren't you?
Click to expand...

Of Trumpists?

Yes, because they have been spewing seditious, treasonous, traitorous garbage in their propaganda for decades. DECADES.

Decades of painting democrats as enemies of the US, as enemies of our values, as enemies of the state.

I have ZERO trust and ZERO faith in -any- of you to not resort to violence, and the WB is absolutely at threat of termination by the frothing, lunatic right wing.
 
HumblePi said:
“I think Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony, and then I think it will be ultimately determined at that point,” said Paul. “But I think he is a person of interest in the sense that he was at the Ukraine desk when Joe Biden was there when Hunter Biden was working for the Ukrainian oligarch. So simply for that alone, I think he’s a material witness who needs to be brought in.”
Click to expand...

So it's even worse than that he Named the Whistle blower. He doesn't even know for sure who the whistle blower is and he just guessed. So he basically put a target on some guys back and he doesn't even know if it's the right guy.
 
HumblePi said:
Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul named the alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella and called for him to testify as part of the impeachment hearings.
During a Wednesday interview on Washington, D.C.-based WMAL, Paul was asked about a controversial remark he made last week when he called for the press to name the whistleblower but refused to do so himself. On Wednesday, Paul named Ciaramella and said he should be brought in to clarify whether he is indeed the whistleblower.
“I think Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony, and then I think it will be ultimately determined at that point,” said Paul. “But I think he is a person of interest in the sense that he was at the Ukraine desk when Joe Biden was there when Hunter Biden was working for the Ukrainian oligarch. So simply for that alone, I think he’s a material witness who needs to be brought in.”

Rand Paul names alleged whistleblower: ‘Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony’

---------------------------------------------------------

Rand Paul is human scum
Click to expand...

Would you like some cheese with that whine?
 
apdst said:
You folks are really scared. Aren't you?
Click to expand...

I have been scared for the soul and heart of this country since a terrible Tuesday back in November of 2016.
 
WCH said:
As well they should be. Nancy better pull the plug quick.
Click to expand...

if this shambles of a third hand info investigation is all they have, they are in for some bad times ahead.

the jist of the Democrat led impeachment hearing thus far:

 
Glad to see that at least one guy has guts. Anyone accused of wrongdoing is entitled to face their accuser. Schiff can't keep this guy in his basement forever.
 
veritas1 said:
Glad to see that at least one guy has guts. Anyone accused of wrongdoing is entitled to face their accuser. Schiff can't keep this guy in his basement forever.
Click to expand...

And the anti-Trumps can't keep making excuses for Schiffty.
 
HumblePi said:
Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul named the alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella and called for him to testify as part of the impeachment hearings.
During a Wednesday interview on Washington, D.C.-based WMAL, Paul was asked about a controversial remark he made last week when he called for the press to name the whistleblower but refused to do so himself. On Wednesday, Paul named Ciaramella and said he should be brought in to clarify whether he is indeed the whistleblower.
“I think Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony, and then I think it will be ultimately determined at that point,” said Paul. “But I think he is a person of interest in the sense that he was at the Ukraine desk when Joe Biden was there when Hunter Biden was working for the Ukrainian oligarch. So simply for that alone, I think he’s a material witness who needs to be brought in.”

Rand Paul names alleged whistleblower: ‘Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony’

---------------------------------------------------------

Rand Paul is human scum
Click to expand...

Tell us how you really feel... :flame:
 
trixare4kids said:
And the anti-Trumps can't keep making excuses for Schiffty.
Click to expand...

This thing is coming apart even without the WB but when/if he has to testify under oath, the stake will really be driven into it. Those two guys today were supposed to be their "star" witnesses. If that's all they have, then the whole farce is DOA, even with Schiff's Soviet style attempts to keep out evidence and coach witnesses.
 
HumblePi said:
Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul named the alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella and called for him to testify as part of the impeachment hearings.
During a Wednesday interview on Washington, D.C.-based WMAL, Paul was asked about a controversial remark he made last week when he called for the press to name the whistleblower but refused to do so himself. On Wednesday, Paul named Ciaramella and said he should be brought in to clarify whether he is indeed the whistleblower.
“I think Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony, and then I think it will be ultimately determined at that point,” said Paul. “But I think he is a person of interest in the sense that he was at the Ukraine desk when Joe Biden was there when Hunter Biden was working for the Ukrainian oligarch. So simply for that alone, I think he’s a material witness who needs to be brought in.”

Rand Paul names alleged whistleblower: ‘Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony’

---------------------------------------------------------

Rand Paul is human scum
Click to expand...

Even were this true, he'd still be evolutionary miles ahead of cockroach turds like Schiff, Pelosi, Schumer and Ciamerella.
 
veritas1 said:
This thing is coming apart even without the WB but when/if he has to testify under oath, the stake will really be driven into it. Those two guys today were supposed to be their "star" witnesses. If that's all they have, then the whole farce is DOA, even with Schiff's Soviet style attempts to keep out evidence and coach witnesses.
Click to expand...

The anger expressed throughout almost every thread today tells me that the anti-Trumps are losing their grasp on the reality of the situation.
It's not like we haven't been warning them...

But just like before, Russian collusion delusion, their evil stunt attempting to prevent Kavanaugh from attaining a SC seat, their willingness to accept and then rebuke the Mueller report, and now this... shows they probably should just concentrate on having their party secure a competent candidate capable of beating our president. They never seem to learn by their party's mistakes.
 
trixare4kids said:
The anger expressed throughout almost every thread today tells me that the anti-Trumps are losing their grasp on the reality of the situation.
It's not like we haven't been warning them...

But just like before, Russian collusion delusion, their stunt to prevent Kavanaugh from attaining a SC seat, their willingness to accept and then rebuke the Mueller report, and now this... shows they probably should just concentrate on having their party secure a competent candidate capable of beating our president. They never seem to learn by their party's mistakes.
Click to expand...

They know they have nobody capable of winning. That's the whole reason you're hearing about Bloomberg, Deval Patrick and Shrillary. It's dawning on them that they have nobody who can win because the country will reject their insane socialist ideas. It's also why they are so very desperate to make impeachment work this time. Even after Trump wins, I expect them to carry on with their psychotic efforts to get him. They'll be doing it right up to the new guy taking his oath on 1/20/25.
 
trixare4kids said:
The anger expressed throughout almost every thread today tells me that the anti-Trumps are losing their grasp on the reality of the situation.
It's not like we haven't been warning them...

But just like before, Russian collusion delusion, their evil stunt attempting to prevent Kavanaugh from attaining a SC seat, their willingness to accept and then rebuke the Mueller report, and now this... shows they probably should just concentrate on having their party secure a competent candidate capable of beating our president. They never seem to learn by their party's mistakes.
Click to expand...

Rather than addressing their own horrendous conduct, and backing a great candidate like Gabbard, the Democrats will continue with their criminally insane, arsonous rampage.

Democrats gotta Democrat.

:hm
 
3leftsdoo said:
Even were this true, he'd still be evolutionary miles ahead of cockroach turds like Schiff, Pelosi, Schumer and Ciamerella.
Click to expand...

You don't get it yet either, do you? Rand Paul is a Russian operative. That's been pretty clear since his mysterious trip to Russia to deliver a 'letter' to Putin's spies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom