- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 52,009
- Reaction score
- 33,944
- Location
- The Golden State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Tell me about oil for food..
tell me how that effected GWB's legal war on Iraq...
I know its hard to type with Obama pom poms on your hands..
Many Democrats supported the invasion of Iraq, that is true.
What about Obama, was he on board with it?
Maybe Obama was too busy performing fellatio and a rim job in Saddam Hussein's nether regions.Many Democrats supported the invasion of Iraq, that is true.
What about Obama, was he on board with it?
Rand Paul is the latest far right wing GOP wet dream fulfillment. He embodies the full complement of wacko beliefs that the far right so dearly loves. My fondest hope is that he does indeed run for the GOP presidential nomination in 2016, gets royally screwed out of it, and goes rogue forming his own third party and mounts a serious run that way.
He will lack no support from the tri-cornered folks on this site on others. The only drawback with that is that they spend lots of time fighting the political wars on a computer and do next to nothing our on the streets where the actual door to door work is done to win elections.
Got that cost down and saved the people of his State and the Country that money.....huh?
While he may have spent less money on his staff, all the money he spent was wasted because he accomplished nothing
While he may have spent less money on his staff, all the money he spent was wasted because he accomplished nothing
That's the great thing he stopped all unnecessary spending with his Office. That's called an Accomplishment and Achieving one of his goals. Maybe the Democrats.....should learn to actually read and write. So they can take Notes!
who cares... Obama is a complete enemy of the USA... maybe that worthless Alinsky clone voted "present"...who cares...Obama is a zero ...
Now again tell me about Oil for Food since you mock GWB...oh wait that was Catwaba...
It always tickles me when our more extreme rightwingers take it upon themselves to speak for the "USA." I always think to myself, "You got a mouse in your pocket?"
He may be your enemy Travis, but most of the USA, certainly the majority, support Obama and not you or your brand of politics. Mathmatically, where the majority rules, doesn't that make you an enemy to the USA moreso than Obama?
Actually, Rand Paul is a mixed bag for me. He espouses a lot of my own Libertarian views, but sometimes goes a bit too far. I do have a lot of Libertarian leanings, but Objectivism and Anarcho-Capitalism are not among them. I don't have a problem with him being in the Senate. His extremist views will be tamped down there, while his sensible views will be among those that are a legitimate contribution to the discussion of America's future.
Nope, spending money (which he did) to accomplish nothing is not called "saving money"; it's called "wasting money"
Didn't you mean the majority out of the 2/3rds of the population that didn't vote?
Rand Paul To Clinton: Benghazi ‘Worst Tragedy Since 9/11′ — I Would Have Fired You | The New Civil Rights Movement
Okay regardless of what your party affiliation is, we all know that this guy is full of ****. I guess he overlook the hot topic about some shooting that occurred in CT. What was that story about again???
This guy is slim.
Rand Paul represents what is wrong with the republican party.
He another one of these people Jingal is talking about.
We can only speculate where these people who didn't vote stand. But the majority of voters voted for Obama. No spin or diversion in the world can negate that fact.
Which is ironic because Jingal is one of the people Jingal is talking about. The republcian party won't be able to recover from its losses for decades. They have a long history of hating every group but the rich white upper 1%.
Well, I don't know how long the history is but one certainly cannot argue that it isn't what they are about today.
I am old enough to remember when the GOP was an honorable party on the side of the people over their corporate special interests. I long for the day when that becomes reality again. Some GOP'er's seemed to have got the message. Some are fighting tooth and nail in their denial.
Time will tell if the GOP get's with the program or not.
My guess is, it will take the shock of losing the House in 2014, to bring about the change.
Did you forget the 30 Republican states already? Plus the 10-12 Democratic Senators that wont be running for re-election?
Indeed it will more than likely come as shock should the Democrats lose more States plus the Senate.
You mean like the "Republican" states, California and Florida?
Turnout in this year's presidential and Senate primaries was the lowest on record, at 15.9 percent of eligible citizens, a new report found.
Turnout reached record lows for presidential election years in 15 of 41 states which held statewide primaries in both parties. Democratic turnout dropped to record lows in 26 of 41 primaries. In the 46 states where Republican primaries were held, there were eight record lows and three record highs," according to the report by the Center for the Study of the American Electorate.
The findings run counter to the common-sense notion that a close election means high turnout.
Democratic turnout was at record lows in Alabama, at 5.3 percent of eligible voters, and 25 other states, including Maryland, at 8 percent. Presidential primaries in most states have been in place since 1972, so the national Democratic turnout was lower than in all recent cycles in which Democrats did not have a contested presidential primary.
Read more: Voter turnout for 2012 statewide primaries was lowest on record - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
He won.....but that's about all they can say.
Did you forget the 30 Republican states already? Plus the 10-12 Democratic Senators that wont be running for re-election?
Indeed it will more than likely come as shock should the Democrats lose more States plus the Senate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?