"Radicalized GOP" and " twisted people" called out on Fox News called out in damning new ad.

[Subieguy]

is it any wonder domestic terrorism in the US is still a huge issue?

Progressive pac Midastouch is calling on people to reject the radicalized GOP with its latest viral ad.


prime-time host Tucker Carlson, for example, has in recent weeks pushed white supremacist rhetoric, downplayed the deadly U.S. Capitol riot and sowed doubt about COVID-19 vaccines.
“The radicalized Republican party and the twisted people on TV who speak for them use the very same language of intolerance and rage to provoke those alienated people,” he concludes. “And until we all reject these poisonous voices, the result will inevitably be escalating violence and tragedy.”

'Radicalized' GOP And 'Twisted People' On Fox News Called Out In Damning New Ad

"Reject these poisonous voices," urges the new spot from progressive PAC MeidasTouch.

www.huffpost.com

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Laudable effort, but without a lot of air time in major markets across America, messages like the above aren’t any more beneficial than “thoughts and prayers”.

 

[Mashmont]

is it any wonder domestic terrorism in the US is still a huge issue?

Progressive pac Midastouch is calling on people to reject the radicalized GOP with its latest viral ad.


prime-time host Tucker Carlson, for example, has in recent weeks pushed white supremacist rhetoric, downplayed the deadly U.S. Capitol riot and sowed doubt about COVID-19 vaccines.
“The radicalized Republican party and the twisted people on TV who speak for them use the very same language of intolerance and rage to provoke those alienated people,” he concludes. “And until we all reject these poisonous voices, the result will inevitably be escalating violence and tragedy.”

'Radicalized' GOP And 'Twisted People' On Fox News Called Out In Damning New Ad

"Reject these poisonous voices," urges the new spot from progressive PAC MeidasTouch.

www.huffpost.com

Now if you object to a presidential election being stolen, you are 'radicalized'. These talking points, of course, are being passed down from the Marxist backers.

 

[code1211]

is it any wonder domestic terrorism in the US is still a huge issue?

Progressive pac Midastouch is calling on people to reject the radicalized GOP with its latest viral ad.


prime-time host Tucker Carlson, for example, has in recent weeks pushed white supremacist rhetoric, downplayed the deadly U.S. Capitol riot and sowed doubt about COVID-19 vaccines.
“The radicalized Republican party and the twisted people on TV who speak for them use the very same language of intolerance and rage to provoke those alienated people,” he concludes. “And until we all reject these poisonous voices, the result will inevitably be escalating violence and tragedy.”

'Radicalized' GOP And 'Twisted People' On Fox News Called Out In Damning New Ad

"Reject these poisonous voices," urges the new spot from progressive PAC MeidasTouch.

www.huffpost.com

Propagandists seem to control your thinking.

 

[Subieguy]

Propagandists seem to control your thinking.

wrong. I control my thinking.

 

[Subieguy]

Now if you object to a presidential election being stolen, you are 'radicalized'. These talking points, of course, are being passed down from the Marxist backers.

For the one millionth time it was NOT stolen. Only Q people think this. Are you Q?

 

[Mashmont]

For the one millionth time it was NOT stolen. Only Q people think this. Are you Q?

And did you publish the results of your personal investigation?

 

[GDViking]

For the one millionth time it was NOT stolen. Only Q people think this. Are you Q?

If you have to ask that you have not been reading his posts...

 

[noonereal]

Now if you object to a presidential election being stolen, you are 'radicalized'.

I realize you will not allow yourself to realize this but I offer this statement as a community service none the less.

Repeating a lie over and over again does not make it true.

Please pass this along.

Thanks,

 

[noonereal]

If you have to ask that you have not been reading his posts...

when does it cross over from propaganda to flat out spam?

That is what I wonder when I read these posts.

 

[Subieguy]

And did you publish the results of your personal investigation?

I did not, but if you have any widespread proof of massive voter fraud will you please post it? Thanks.

 

[Mashmont]

I did not, but if you have any widespread proof of massive voter fraud will you please post it? Thanks.

Over 1000 sworn affidavits from eyewitnesses. Will that suffice?

 

[Subieguy]

Over 1000 sworn affidavits from eyewitnesses. Will that suffice?

of massive widespread voting fraud enough to change the outcome of the election?? Please supply the info, thanks!

 

[Mashmont]

of massive widespread voting fraud enough to change the outcome of the election?? Please supply the info, thanks!

Sidney Powell has it.

 

[GDViking]

of massive widespread voting fraud enough to change the outcome of the election?? Please supply the info, thanks!

They're easily found in tbe trash as all of them were thrown out of court...

Remember the few people Giuliani paraded before Congress on the day his depends were taking a beating???

Those were the authors he declared credible...


In court he stated that at least half of that thousand were false, and he ?could not guarantee any of tbe rest...

 

[GDViking]

Sidney Powell has it.

I wonder if she'll sell em for 1.3 BILLION???

 

[bongsaway]

Now if you object to a presidential election being stolen, you are 'radicalized'. These talking points, of course, are being passed down from the Marxist backers.

Your whole phrasing of your answer shouts bs. No election was stolen, marxists? The only radicals I've seen are the ones who refuse to accept trump lost.

 

[Subieguy]

Sidney Powell has it.

well then message them to post it in the media somewhere! Anywhere but Fox, OAN or Newsmax though, lol.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Now if you object to a presidential election being stolen, you are 'radicalized'. These talking points, of course, are being passed down from the Marxist backers.

If you still believe that the election was stolen, you haven’t been paying attention at all to facts, or you are deluded

60+ lawsuits lost, withdrawn, or rejected outright, Republican officials across the country certifying Biden as winner in their respective states, multiple recounts in multiple states. Even SCOTUS refused to even consider any bogus lawsuits.

There is zero credible evidence to argue otherwise.

 

[beefheart]

Now if you object to a presidential election being stolen, you are 'radicalized'. These talking points, of course, are being passed down from the Marxist backers.

You have provided zero proof of this fantasy.

 

[Mashmont]

You have provided zero proof of this fantasy.

Should I go to Soros-backed Snopes for evidence?

My favorite Snopes piece was when they did a fact-check on the claim "Snopes receives money from Soros to lie". Oddly enough, Snopes rated that claim 'false'.
lol.
Oh, the irony.

 

[beefheart]

Should I go to Soros-backed Snopes for evidence?

My favorite Snopes piece was when they did a fact-check on the claim "Snopes receives money from Soros to lie". Oddly enough, Snopes rated that claim 'false'.
lol.
Oh, the irony.

Again, you have no proof for your fantasies.

 

[Mashmont]

Again, you have no proof for your fantasies.

Contact Snopes. lol.

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

Over 1000 sworn affidavits from eyewitnesses. Will that suffice?

You do realize that those affidavits (essentially) say "I believe that the election was stolen." (emphasis added) and that none of them actually offer any actual proof - don't you?

Possibly you'd like to tell us what rational conclusion can be drawn from "1,000 affidavits" concerning "X" when none of them contain any actual evidence of "X"?

 

[vanceen]

is it any wonder domestic terrorism in the US is still a huge issue?

...

Can you quantify this "huge issue"?

Does that mean it's a "huge problem"?

What's the probability that an individual will be harmed by "domestic terrorism"? How many "domestic terrorists" are there?

And yes, I know about the FBI ranking. Something has to be at the top of the list, it doesn't prove it's a significant problem.

And yes, I would say the same about non-domestic terrorism in the US, by Islamist radicals or anyone else. It's miniscule.