• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Qwest's Refusal of N.S.A. Query Is Explained (1 Viewer)

Do you feel that Bush's NSA wiretaps are illegal.

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 90.0%
  • No

    Votes: 1 10.0%

  • Total voters
    10

jfuh

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 10, 2005
Messages
16,631
Reaction score
1,227
Location
Pacific Rim
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
One company had the balls to say: " This is bs, this is against the law, and so no we are not going to cooperate with you."
Kudos to quest for standing up to this illegal administration and upholding the law where all the other telecommunications companies caved in over fear tactics.
In a statement released this morning, the lawyer said that the former chief executive, Joseph N. Nacchio, made the decision after asking whether "a warrant or other legal process had been secured in support of that request."Mr. Nacchio learned that no warrant had been granted and that there was a "disinclination on the part of the authorities to use any legal process," said the lawyer, Herbert J. Stern. As a result, the statement said, Mr. Nacchio concluded that "the requests violated the privacy requirements of the Telecommunications Act."
Source
 
Illegal? Thats a matter of dates... if its found to be illegal NOW by THEN it will be made legal.

But im proud to see that not every company bends over to this administration.
 
These wiretap accusations really need to specify whether or not some calls were domestic.

Oh, wait..

Qwest was the only phone company to turn down requests from the security agency for phone records as part of a program to compile a vast database of numbers and other information on virtually all domestic calls.

Everybody drop your crappy phone company and subscribe with Qwest!
 
Last edited:
Binary_Digit said:
Everybody drop your crappy phone company and subscribe with Qwest!
That was my immediate reaction to this story! If people were to start leaving the other three companies in droves and turn Qwest in the biggest phone company, I wonder what effect that would have? Hmmmmm
 
NYStateofMind said:
That was my immediate reaction to this story! If people were to start leaving the other three companies in droves and turn Qwest in the biggest phone company, I wonder what effect that would have? Hmmmmm
When I first saw this new break today I thought, sh/t, sign me up right now. But then, not available in my area.
I wonder if anyone is thinking the same way as I?
Anyone know if Deutch Telecom aka T-Mobile caved in to the white house harrassments?
 
Joseph N. Nacchio------Don't know how true it is, but I read an AP article today that said the Feds were going after this guy. He is facing some kind of legal battle----is that a suprise to anyone?

Nachio has been federally indicted for insider trading, when did the Feds start caring about that? GW just got a warning, not even that.
 
ludahai said:
Do you know the difference between a "wiretap" and "a database of phone numbers?" Apparently Not!

Again, ludahai wants to prove that he knows more than anyone else on this message board. Okaaaaaaaaaaaay. I repeat, ludahai, you don't really know what the NSA is doing. It's nice of you to take the Bush Administration at face value. How sweet. LOL
 
aps said:
Again, ludahai wants to prove that he knows more than anyone else on this message board. Okaaaaaaaaaaaay. I repeat, ludahai, you don't really know what the NSA is doing. It's nice of you to take the Bush Administration at face value. How sweet. LOL

And of course, with NO EVIDENCE that there IS wiretapping going on, you are willing to simply assume it solely because of your irrational HATRED of President Bush,
 
ludahai said:
And of course, with NO EVIDENCE that there IS wiretapping going on, you are willing to simply assume it solely because of your irrational HATRED of President Bush,

LOL Here is my post again. Can you tell me where I said I assumed that they were wiretapping?

Again, ludahai wants to prove that he knows more than anyone else on this message board. Okaaaaaaaaaaaay. I repeat, ludahai, you don't really know what the NSA is doing. It's nice of you to take the Bush Administration at face value. How sweet. LOL

Yeah, I didn't think so.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom