• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Question for Trump Voters

How Do You Feel About Trump Now?

  • I made a huge mistake voting for him

    Votes: 2 6.1%
  • I'm starting to have my doubts

    Votes: 1 3.0%
  • I'm having a wait and see approach

    Votes: 7 21.2%
  • Trump is already on the path to making America Great Again

    Votes: 23 69.7%

  • Total voters
    33
During the 2nd debate Queen Kankles threatened the ***ing Nuclear Super Power; Russia with war over the possibility that they were leaking her emails.
 
Did I claim that I liked Hillary. Like Hillary or no, the faintest notion that NUCLEAR ****ING WAR is preferable to her in office is idiotic. So call that a dodge if you want, I really couldn't give two shiny turds.

What, exactly, do you think would have happened during a Hillary Clinton presidency that would be so mindbendingly awful? Take me down that rabbit hole.[/QUOTE

What, exactly, do you think will happen during a Donald Trump presidency that would be so mindbendingly awful? Take me down that rabbit hole.
 
During the 2nd debate Queen Kankles threatened the ***ing Nuclear Super Power; Russia with war over the possibility that they were leaking her emails.

Yeah, yer a Frump supporter alright — make any outrageous claim that pops into yer head without a single fact to back it up. Here's a transcript. No such statement, nothing even hinting at it, is in there.

Do you not understand that the electorate has had it up to their ears with liberal policies?

Yeah, that's why a weak Democratic candidate won the popular vote by three million ballots. Gallup had conservatives up by nineteen points in 2010, and that lead was down to eleven in 2016.

What, exactly, do you think will happen during a Donald Trump presidency that would be so mindbendingly awful?

The same thing that happened under the last GOP POTUS — a reckless and very expensive overseas military misadventure (fwiw, I blame Dickhead Chaingang & Associates, not Mr. Bush), massive and completely unproductive tax cut giveaways to wealthy, fat cat households, and a dangerous and irresponsible deregulation of the financial sector — a set of policies that will again lead to a severe recession if not an even more destructive collapse of the economy.
 
Did I claim that I liked Hillary. Like Hillary or no, the faintest notion that NUCLEAR ****ING WAR is preferable to her in office is idiotic. So call that a dodge if you want, I really couldn't give two shiny turds.

What, exactly, do you think would have happened during a Hillary Clinton presidency that would be so mindbendingly awful? Take me down that rabbit hole.

In the second debate it was Hillary not Trump who threatened the nuclear superpower Russia with war. In the context of her statement it was clear she was pissed that her emails were being leaked and she was willing to take America to war over the threat to her political career not for any threat to America.

Right now America is prospering and improving in every area. In the rabbit hole of Hillary as president she keeps the Progressive Liberal policies in place that had America stagnate and in decline.

Like Reagan did after the failures of Carter, Trump is creating nothing but growth and prosperity after the failure and malaise of Obama. Its happening quick enough that even the most uninformed American can contrast the two. I have no doubt that it's "mindnumbingly awful" for a Nasty Leftist to see his entire Ideology totally destroyed.
 
In the second debate it was Hillary not Trump who threatened the nuclear superpower Russia with war. In the context of her statement it was clear she was pissed that her emails were being leaked and she was willing to take America to war over the threat to her political career not for any threat to America.

Right now America is prospering and improving in every area. In the rabbit hole of Hillary as president she keeps the Progressive Liberal policies in place that had America stagnate and in decline.

Like Reagan did after the failures of Carter, Trump is creating nothing but growth and prosperity after the failure and malaise of Obama. Its happening quick enough that even the most uninformed American can contrast the two. I have no doubt that it's "mindnumbingly awful" for a Nasty Leftist to see his entire Ideology totally destroyed.

Where?
 
What, exactly, do you think would have happened during a Hillary Clinton presidency that would be so mindbendingly awful? Take me down that rabbit hole.

More of the same international mediocrity, economic stagnation, and socio-cultural degeneration we got under Obama.

Say what you will about Trump's abbrasive personality. At least he seems to have the gumption to change things on a real, material, basis, unlikely his limp-wristed "hopey-changey" weakling predecessor.
 
More of the same international mediocrity, economic stagnation, and socio-cultural degeneration we got under Obama.

Say what you will about Trump's abbrasive personality. At least he seems to have the gumption to change things on a real, material, basis, unlikely his limp-wristed "hopey-changey" weakling predecessor.

Well said
 
In the second debate it was Hillary not Trump who threatened the nuclear superpower Russia with war.

No, that's a lie. I posted the transcript. Show us where she said anything that even suggests that. You can't.

>>In the context of her statement it was clear she was pissed that her emails were being leaked and she was willing to take America to war over the threat to her political career not for any threat to America.

What statement?

>>Right now America is prospering and improving in every area.

Completely unsupported. You offer nothing to back that up. It's just vague nonsense.

>>Hillary as president she keeps the Progressive Liberal policies in place that had America stagnate and in decline.

What stagnation? What decline? This is Frumpian rhetoric.

>>Like Reagan did after the failures of Carter

Again completely unsupported. Reagan and his unfortunate successor doubled the national debt as a percentage of GDP.

>>Trump is creating nothing but growth and prosperity after the failure and malaise of Obama.

Just more of the same. You have no idea what yer talking about.

>>Its happening quick enough that even the most uninformed American can contrast the two.

You come across as entirely uninformed, so tell us about this "growth and prosperity" that has occurred in the past three weeks.

>>I have no doubt that it's "mindnumbingly awful" for a Nasty Leftist to see his entire Ideology totally destroyed.

More empty rhetoric.

More of the same international mediocrity, economic stagnation, and socio-cultural degeneration we got under Obama.

All you guys have is vague BS. Where are the specifics to back up any of this mindless garbage?

>>change things on a real, material, basis

Change what? He's simply making a mockery of the WH and the presidency.

US companies moving back to US.

Which ones?

>>Foreign investors creating jobs in US.

Same thing. I'm not going to pore over yer reading assignments. If you don't have anything to offer other than links, just admit that and stop wasting my time.

>>Stock market at a 20 year high.

DJIA up 150% under Obummer; up all of two percent so far under the Lying Fraud Slut Clown Pig. Btw, it's an all-time high.

>>Value of the US dollar improving (Young Turks caught in an embarrassing lie over this).

Improving from what baseline? It rose significantly after the election, but has now lost some of that gain. And The Great Leader doesn't seem to know where he wants it to go, calling his National Security Adviser at 3 AM to ask what he thought. Flynn told him to ask an economist.

Frump old the WSJ four weeks ago that US companies "can’t compete" with their Chinese counterparts "because our currency is too strong. And it's killing us." It's difficult to decide who's more uninformed, the great businessman and deal-maker or his gullible supporters. Do we want a weaker dollar to help US exporters or a stronger one that will benefit consumers? My thought is that stability may be the best prescription. We've been getting volatility so far, and that's what this lying jerk is all about.

Since January 19, the Mexican peso is the strongest currency in the world, gaining 7.8% against the US dollar. We'd better get to work on that wall real soon.

Well said

Pfft.
 
No, that's a lie. I posted the transcript. Show us where she said anything that even suggests that. You can't.

>>In the context of her statement it was clear she was pissed that her emails were being leaked and she was willing to take America to war over the threat to her political career not for any threat to America.

What statement?

>>Right now America is prospering and improving in every area.

Completely unsupported. You offer nothing to back that up. It's just vague nonsense.

>>Hillary as president she keeps the Progressive Liberal policies in place that had America stagnate and in decline.

What stagnation? What decline? This is Frumpian rhetoric.

>>Like Reagan did after the failures of Carter

Again completely unsupported. Reagan and his unfortunate successor doubled the national debt as a percentage of GDP.

>>Trump is creating nothing but growth and prosperity after the failure and malaise of Obama.

Just more of the same. You have no idea what yer talking about.

>>Its happening quick enough that even the most uninformed American can contrast the two.

You come across as entirely uninformed, so tell us about this "growth and prosperity" that has occurred in the past three weeks.

>>I have no doubt that it's "mindnumbingly awful" for a Nasty Leftist to see his entire Ideology totally destroyed.

More empty rhetoric.



All you guys have is vague BS. Where are the specifics to back up any of this mindless garbage?

>>change things on a real, material, basis

Change what? He's simply making a mockery of the WH and the presidency.



Which ones?

>>Foreign investors creating jobs in US.

Same thing. I'm not going to pore over yer reading assignments. If you don't have anything to offer other than links, just admit that and stop wasting my time.

>>Stock market at a 20 year high.

DJIA up 150% under Obummer; up all of two percent so far under the Lying Fraud Slut Clown Pig. Btw, it's an all-time high.

>>Value of the US dollar improving (Young Turks caught in an embarrassing lie over this).

Improving from what baseline? It rose significantly after the election, but has now lost some of that gain. And The Great Leader doesn't seem to know where he wants it to go, calling his National Security Adviser at 3 AM to ask what he thought. Flynn told him to ask an economist.

Frump old the WSJ four weeks ago that US companies "can’t compete" with their Chinese counterparts "because our currency is too strong. And it's killing us." It's difficult to decide who's more uninformed, the great businessman and deal-maker or his gullible supporters. Do we want a weaker dollar to help US exporters or a stronger one that will benefit consumers? My thought is that stability may be the best prescription. We've been getting volatility so far, and that's what this lying jerk is all about.

Since January 19, the Mexican peso is the strongest currency in the world, gaining 7.8% against the US dollar. We'd better get to work on that wall real soon.



Pfft.

:lamo I enjoyed your post...
 
No, that's a lie. I posted the transcript. Show us where she said anything that even suggests that. You can't.

>>In the context of her statement it was clear she was pissed that her emails were being leaked and she was willing to take America to war over the threat to her political career not for any threat to America.

What statement?

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...jS8UyWChCGFL3C9Bw&sig2=JR5z__SoSrMuiS6wAhIHwA

I will destroy the rest of this pathetic post later.
 
Christ, you guys have convinced yourself she's basically Magneto.

A nuclear World War III is preferable to Hillary as president? That's one of the most utterly deranged things I've ever read in my life.

No it isn't. If we get into nuclear war under trump, Hillary would have gotten us in two.
 
I enjoyed your post

Fish in a barrel.

I will destroy the rest of this pathetic post later.

Please learn to use the QUOTE tag properly. Or did you fail to close it so that I wouldn't receive a notification of yer response?

There are a couple of problems with yer information here. First, that video clip is from a speech Clinton made in Ohio in August, not the second debate. Secondly, there's absolutely nothing in her statement that indicates she would be "willing to take America to war over the threat to her political career."

You got this nonsense from a clown named Paul Joseph Watson, who has promoted the claim that the WTC attack was a controlled demolition, that Obummer's birth certificate is a forgery, and that fluoridation is "the collusion of major industries to put certified toxic waste into your drinking water." He does this to make money off fools who visit sites where this crap is published (e.g., InfoWars and PrisonPlanet). Now if you want to argue that this insanity finds its way into the Frump WH, I'll agree. But there's no reason to take it seriously, other than as a threat to democracy.

I await the rest of yer destruction of my post. I'm sure you'll have some interesting things to say about the performance of the US economy in recent decades and about the fluctuation of the US dollar since the election. Who are the "Young Turks caught in an embarrassing lie"?
 
DJIA up 150% under Obummer; up all of two percent so far under the Lying Fraud Slut Clown Pig. Btw, it's an all-time high.

Big deal. He loaded the Fed with doves and got them to finance huge deficits, run ZIRP and pour trillions of dollars of QE indirectly into the markets.

Any idiot - with enough power - can 'artificially' pump up the markets like that.

Obama is a much better man than Trump. And Trump's protectionist ideas are sheer idiocy. But anyone who thinks Obama poured magic on the economy/equity markets have not a clue what they are talking about. The Fed propped up the stock markets...Obama just took the credit.


BTW - it's been a few days...aren't you due for another banning?


Have a nice day.
 
Last edited:
I feel about the same. Even if Trump gets us into a nuclear World War III we're still bound to be better off than with Hillary as president.

Say whaa.webp


No wonder DP had server problems. That comment is like asking a computer to divide by zero.


BTW. Current results not unexpected. Trump voters did not have discerning eyes before the election; I am not certain why their vision would have suddenly sharpened.

BTW2. A parallel poll for non-trump voters: Is trump better, worse or as expected, thus far.
 
CT here. My vote hasn't mattered since I moved to this god forsaken state.


However, if you have already decided that he's doing a good or bad job, it's probably because you're either a hack, or a moron. It's too soon to tell. Too soon to tell if his people were he right choices, too soon to tell if his executive orders are the right choices, etc. We can make assumptions. But that's all they are. And you know what they say about those.

Anything that isn't Obama or Hillary looks like a positive trend to me.
 
Sooooo...according to the OP poll - roughly 50-60% of people who voted in this poll are 'white' males who live in the sticks and have never seen the inside of a college/university.

Who Are Donald Trump's Supporters? - The Atlantic

You are so wrong. But I encourage you to continue to believe that; it has certainly been advantageous to our cause so far.
 
anyone who thinks Obama poured magic on the economy/equity markets

I was simply responding to the claim that Frump is somehow responsible for the "tock market at a 20 year high." We've all heard you go on and on with the ZipHedge attacks on the Fed. All you care about is yer investments in Precious. I will agree that we may be in a dangerous position, hoping for a careful unwinding of QE with a lunatic in the WH.

>>it's been a few days...aren't you due for another banning?

Only about thirty-six hours. I call 'em like I see 'em, and I enjoy my time away from DP. I'm still looking for a community with reasoned conservatives, and this sure ain't it. I've been reading up on productivity over the past two weeks.

You are so wrong.

Wrong about what? He's just reporting the results of the poll. What didn't you like in that Atlantic article?

>>I encourage you to continue to believe that; it has certainly been advantageous to our cause so far.

The demographics are what they are.

Two-thirds (67%) of non-college whites backed Trump, compared with just 28% who supported Clinton, resulting in a 39-point advantage for Trump among this group. (source)​

I agree that Democrats need to do better with HS-educated whites, but that's a tough nut to crack. Many will continue to get their news from lying, RW hate media, and that makes it difficult to reach them with analyses of what's really going on in he world. The sad thing, from my perspective, is that Frump isn't going to do a damn thing to make their lives better.

Regarding yer signature, WJC was referring to the pernicious effect of mindless RW extremism represented in GOP obstructionism during the Negro's two terms. Because they don't have the facts or logic on their side, the Right is reduced to continually lying.

You don't even have the correct quote:

But if you believe we can all rise together, if you believe we’ve finally come to the point where we can put the awful legacy of the last eight years behind us and the seven years before that when we were practicing trickle-down economics and no regulation in Washington, which is what caused the crash, then you should vote for her … .​
 
You are so wrong. But I encourage you to continue to believe that; it has certainly been advantageous to our cause so far.

It's not me, Trumpbot...it is facts derived at by numerous organizations during the election.

You have a problem with them - complain to them, not me.


And your cause (Trumpbots)? What is that? To spread uneducated, xenophobic, ***** grabbing, protectionistic nonsense throughout the world.

Have fun with that.

I could care less...I despise both parties. I just posted the above for fun.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 67213881


No wonder DP had server problems. That comment is like asking a computer to divide by zero.


BTW. Current results not unexpected. Trump voters did not have discerning eyes before the election; I am not certain why their vision would have suddenly sharpened.

BTW2. A parallel poll for non-trump voters: Is trump better, worse or as expected, thus far.

You can ask Siri to divide zero by zero and you will get an answer.
 
How do you feel now about your vote?

I feel great ! Finally someone that's not following the lobbyist orders . Trump is working down his list of promises and the left is going insane ! :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom