You pat yourself on the back because you can see how outrageous Trump is, like Liz Cheney and a handful of others. But you refuse to acknowledge the damaging delusions of the pro-Trump GOP.
The MSM's "abuses" don't begin to touch the rightwing media's complete abandonment of journalistic responsibility.
What? Tapper questioned Biden's decline? How is that possible in the far-left, socialist MSM?????? How is Tapper still employed? Who are the Tappers of the right-wing media?
Your spin on them could only be convincing to someone who has marinated in far-right misinformation.
Lies are not "data," and treating them as such is a disservice to the audience. That's the rub. It's taken the MSM years to finally start calling the right's constant lies what they truly are.
I guess you missed the entire 2020 election. Never mind then.
Remember Whitewater? That was, what -50? - front page articles in the NYT? As opposed to Bush and Cheney lying about WMD? Which one of those led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people?
I remember when this kind of thing would be a major scandal. Now it's just business as usual.
No, I don't. A citation would be nice, including the WSJ's piece and the subsequent "blasts."
The entire media attacked anyone who reported on the issues. Hmm. I doubt it.
A book written by a member of the MSM, right?
One side plays the tribalist game far better than the other. The MSM's media's determination not to appear biased constantly gets in the way of reporting reality.
Not the entire media.
For sure. Is that a problem?
OK? Weird.
Oh, wow, what a blast. One opinion piece, that points out an obvious fault in the WSJ's report, which was the obvious bias of their sources.
For those who insist that the MSM is uniformly biased, yes.
Don't pull a muscle pretending to miss the point.
I never said the left is perfect. But continued attempts to equate the two gives the anti-democratic forces a pass.
The MSM is biased toward science.
"Dishonest" means intentionally lying. I've seen no examples of that.
Yes, this is just one easily verified example of what the authors of the book have laid out.
Well go bug them.
First you acknowledge that the 2020 election wasn't "stolen," that climate change is real, that Trump sold out Ukraine because he likes tyrants better than leaders who were democratically elected, and that Jan 6 was an attempted coup.
Worse than that, the assholes who hid it (some members of his staff and family members) enabled the return of Trump to the White House, an unmitigated disaster for our nation and the world.
It's more fun bugging you.
Reagan had far more serious problems. He was hands off type POTUS from day one and his admin ran amok. Stockman used to use flashcards for Reagan to get him to make decisions. People used to leave his cabinet meetings wondering what he said or meant. We've had mentally or physically handicapped presidents before.
People get old if they're lucky and have decent immune systems that can find and kill cancerous cells before they become a serious problem. However, some degree of mental decline is likely as one becomes elderly.
