• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Proof God Exists: Here is my 11-Step Logical Proof. Enjoy.

Your racism against black people will not be tolerated here.


I think it's awful that you said you support bringing back slavery

It's not working. Everyone in here saw you say "Catholics should be held accountable". To me, that's a direct threat and especially when you add in the fact that I'm black
 
It's not working. Everyone in here saw you say "Catholics should be held accountable". To me, that's a direct threat and especially when you add in the fact that I'm black

Yes the pedophiles in the catholic church should be held accountable.


The catholic church supported the abuse of children for decades. Of course they should be held accountable.
 
Yes the pedophiles in the catholic church should be held accountable.


The catholic church supported the abuse of children for decades. Of course they should be held accountable.

In an earlier post, he said 'individual Catholics should be held accountable'. As a black man, that sent chills up my spine. I know what 'held accountable' means to these people.
 
Did you read the post I was responding to? It said Catholic saints were 'hateful awful people'. And that is beyond wrong. Only a hateful person would say that Why do you have no comment or criticism about the statement I was responding to?

No, it said many were hateful awful people, still does not change the fact that you bashed atheists. I am pretty sure plenty of non-christians would agree that some catholic saints were hateful awful people.

I am not going to say most of the are awful people. Some I do not even did what they were sainted for but others were plainly bad people.Like saints who forcibly converted people, or who killed local religion people and cultures to convert them.
 
In an earlier post, he said 'individual Catholics should be held accountable'. As a black man, that sent chills up my spine.

It should only worry you if you are among the many many Catholics that tortured and abuse children for decades.


I think I now know why you are worried
 
In what way are medical ethics in opposition to Catholic teaching.
For starters providing birth control

And just because you say you know one of them who isn't Catholic, what makes you think there aren't quite a few Catholics in the organization? lol.
The point is it isn't a Catholic or even Christian organization and not that it is relevant in any way shape or form why in the world would you think there would be Christians in it?

Congrats you lost the debate yet again
 
to be fair an immortal with superpowers walking around who can direct the faith is not bad

not like the bible says jesus just shot up into the sky or anything

True but wouldn't it be better to start where there are large numbers of people instead of a sparsely populated backwater?
 
For starters providing birth control


The point is it isn't a Catholic or even Christian organization and not that it is relevant in any way shape or form why in the world would you think there would be Christians in it?

Congrats you lost the debate yet again

Birth control has nothing to do providing medical attention. And you implied this group didn't have Catholics in it.
 
There is no god. Why? Because the idea is absurd.

There, one logical step.
 
In an earlier post, he said 'individual Catholics should be held accountable'. As a black man, that sent chills up my spine. I know what 'held accountable' means to these people.

I don't recall any reports about an organization of black people who raped children for decade after decade. Of course, pedo priests should be held accountable. Murderers are held individually accountable, and the same applies to kiddy fiddlers. So now you're black?
 
I don't recall any reports about an organization of black people who raped children for decade after decade. Of course, pedo priests should be held accountable. Murderers are held individually accountable, and the same applies to kiddy fiddlers. So now you're black?

Yes. I have always been part black. Up to 2%, according to Ancestry.com, which is more than Elizabeth Warren is Indian.
 
Yes. I have always been part black. Up to 2%, according to Ancestry.com, which is more than Elizabeth Warren is Indian.

Not very interesting. What about you saying that individual pedo priests should not be punished? Why give them a free pass?
 
I don't recall any reports about an organization of black people who raped children for decade after decade. Of course, pedo priests should be held accountable. Murderers are held individually accountable, and the same applies to kiddy fiddlers. So now you're black?

Now he is black. This guy is priceless. Lol
 
Now he is black. This guy is priceless. Lol

In another thread, someone who has been keeping an eye on his claims revealed that he has been married to a 40-year-old woman for 30 years. I have my doubts about that
 
Ladies and gentlemen, a couple of years ago, I devised a logical proof God exists. It is based on the Good Fruits argument, using canonized saints of the Catholic Church, who are universally recognized as great people because they lived among the people they served, and usually endured harsh situations at some point in life. All had strong prayer lives, and daily prayer interaction with God. There are a few postulates which must be accepted on their face. Here is my proof. I hope it will lead a few atheists to conversion back to God.

1. Postulate #1: A wise person is a good (virtuous) person and a good person is a wise person.
2. Postulate #2: If a person is good (virtuous) in one area, he is good across the board.
3 Therefore, if a person is wise in one area, he is wise across the board.
4. Postulate: #3 Wisdom is Truth.
5 Postulate #4: A canonized saint of the Catholic Church is a person who is universally recognized by the majority to have been a very good person in life.
6 Postulate #5: Canonized saints by definition, were very devout believers in God.
7 Since canonized saints are universally recognized as very good people, then by postulate #1, they are very wise people.
8. Since canonized saints are very wise people, by Postulate #2, they are very wise people in all areas, across the board.
9 Therefore, it is very wise to believe in God, since canonized saints were devout believers in God.
10. And since wisdom is truth by Postulate #3 believing in God is wise and therefore the truth
11. Therefore it is true God exists.

These are all subjective assumptions built upon other subjective assumptions. The title of the thread (and thus its implied premise) is wholly misleading, as it appeared to suggest that assumptions are somehow instead to be considered "logical", and therefore ultimately "conclusive" as "proof".

Perhaps I'm late to the party, but this one fell flat on its face right out of the starting gate.


OM
 
These are all subjective assumptions built upon other subjective assumptions. The title of the thread (and thus its implied premise) is wholly misleading, as it appeared to suggest that assumptions are somehow instead to be considered "logical", and therefore ultimately "conclusive" as "proof".

Perhaps I'm late to the party, but this one fell flat on its face right out of the starting gate.


OM

It did. Mashmont's style of debating is 'If I say something then it is true and I don't have to prove it.'
 
Not very interesting. What about you saying that individual pedo priests should not be punished? Why give them a free pass?

I've always said to drum the gay irreligious infiltrators out, and the church, to its credit has done that. Excellent work!!
 
These are all subjective assumptions built upon other subjective assumptions. The title of the thread (and thus its implied premise) is wholly misleading, as it appeared to suggest that assumptions are somehow instead to be considered "logical", and therefore ultimately "conclusive" as "proof".

Perhaps I'm late to the party, but this one fell flat on its face right out of the starting gate.


OM

In proofs, there are always basic assumptions. My basic ones are all valid. No one has been able to dispute any of them.
 
They should be shut down, their leaders imprisoned and their assets sold off to give to the victims

Don't worry, that day is fast approaching...

"Another, a second angel, followed, saying: “She has fallen! Babylon the Great has fallen, she who made all the nations drink of the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality!” Revelation 14:8
 

Yes, people are always asking me which part of China are you from. No doubt in the bad old days in the US south you would have used the colored entrance and not the whites only.
 
Don't worry, that day is fast approaching...

"Another, a second angel, followed, saying: “She has fallen! Babylon the Great has fallen, she who made all the nations drink of the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality!” Revelation 14:8

I think he said that about the atheist public schools. As I recall, I agreed with his post.
 
Yes, people are always asking me which part of China are you from. No doubt in the bad old days in the US south you would have used the colored entrance and not the whites only.

Yes, I probably would have. The South was full of Democratic Party racists in those days.
 
Back
Top Bottom