• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Proof God Exists: Here is my 11-Step Logical Proof. Enjoy.

JustHanging said:
And we can observe things that tell us what happened in the past. For example the fossil record, or the geologic column.

How do you know Big Foot couldn't have done it? You would need to prove that. Perhaps he/she has just been laying low these many years. If they are a god, well, we know how good gods are at appearing to be imaginary.
Click to expand...

The fossil record does not tell us how life began on earth. Nothing science can see or measure does. People need to understand that science is extremely limited and there are some things it will never discover or figure out.
 
Dragonfly said:
Yeah.
And?

Just because science can't prove something doesn't mean "god did it".
At least not for reasonably intelligent thinkers.
Click to expand...

No. Science is incapable of proving how life started on earth. Science is limited. It cannot rule on the possibility of God because science by nature remains totally in the dark when it comes to supernatural matters.
 
marke said:
No. Science is incapable of proving how life started on earth. Science is limited. It cannot rule on the possibility of God because science by nature remains totally in the dark when it comes to supernatural matters.
Click to expand...

There is no god. And, the "supernatural" is just childish bull**** like Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and Tooth Fairies.
 
marke said:
...because science by nature remains totally in the dark when it comes to supernatural matters.
Click to expand...

As is everybody (yourself included), seeing as it's firmly entrenched within the realm of the theoretical.


OM
 
marke said:
No. Science is incapable of proving how life started on earth. Science is limited. It cannot rule on the possibility of God because science by nature remains totally in the dark when it comes to supernatural matters.
Click to expand...

marke said:
The fossil record does not tell us how life began on earth. Nothing science can see or measure does. People need to understand that science is extremely limited and there are some things it will never discover or figure out.
Click to expand...

:roll:

Simply because man currently does not know, and may never know, doesn't mean the automatic default answer becomes "god did it".

You've been told this over and over again.
 
Dragonfly said:
:roll:

Simply because man currently does not know, and may never know, doesn't mean the automatic default answer becomes "god did it".

You've been told this over and over again.
Click to expand...

Precisely. It's somewhat laughable that in attempting to distinguish himself as somehow being above science, that he completely misses the point that he himself also doesn't know for certain our origins. Screaming "supernatural!" doesn't change any of that.


OM
 
calamity said:
There is no god. And, the "supernatural" is just childish bull**** like Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and Tooth Fairies.
Click to expand...

Ah, there it is. A declarative statement that God doesn't exist. Atheists on here have been screaming and jumping up and down that they've NEVER claimed this.....And here it is. And now you have to PROVE IT.
 
I still have not received a reply from the Vatican. I guess that his 'proof' has not impressed them.
 
Mashmont said:
Ah, there it is. A declarative statement that God doesn't exist. Atheists on here have been screaming and jumping up and down that they've NEVER claimed this.....And here it is. And now you have to PROVE IT.
Click to expand...

Only some atheists. I know people who firmly state that gods do not exist. They cannot prove that and you cannot prove that your god exists. You and they are in the same boat.
 
zyzygy said:
Only some atheists. I know people who firmly state that gods do not exist. They cannot prove that and you cannot prove that your god exists. You and they are in the same boat.
Click to expand...

Better read my OP. I just proved it.
 
Michael Johnson said:
LOL add yourself to that same boat of no proof that God doesn't exist.
Click to expand...

Now if only there were a uniform consensus as to what the definition of God is in the first place.


OM
 
Scientists in Portugal have found spaghetti-like structures in neutron stars, showing more evidence of His Noodly Appendage at work:

About a kilometer below the surface of a neutron star, atomic nuclei are squeezed together so close that they merge into clumps of nuclear matter, a dense mixture of neutrons and protons. These as-yet theoretical clumps are thought to be shaped like blobs, tubes or sheets, and are named after their noodle look-alikes, including gnocchi, spaghetti and lasagna. Even deeper in the neutron star, the nuclear matter fully takes over. The burnt-out star’s entire core is nuclear matter, like one giant atomic nucleus.

Nuclear pasta is incredibly dense, about 100 trillion times the density of water.

Evidence << Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster
 
Omega Man said:
Now if only there were a uniform consensus as to what the definition of God is in the first place.


OM
Click to expand...

The God of Abraham. That's been said repeatedly.
 
Michael Johnson said:
Says someone who ignores that he's real.
Click to expand...

I have never uttered any such statement. On the contrary, I have gone on the record time and again here to dispute atheism, along with the caveat that I myself do not presume to know for certain what God is - if God is. That is a very important distinction; one which completely undermines your above snippet. So try responding instead to my comment about how there is no uniform consensus which defines God in the first place.


OM
 
Mashmont said:
The God of Abraham. That's been said repeatedly.
Click to expand...

I said uniform consensus, not the fragmented consensus of those such as yourself who were instructed what to believe.


OM
 
marke said:
You do not have to have faith in God to acknowledge that God remains a possible source of the origin of life and matter.
Click to expand...

Well we will have to agree to disagree on that one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom