Staff doesn't just draw up orders out of the blue. Trump was thinking about using it, but was then talked down about it. Trump already has a history with the Insurrection Act and desires to deploy it. He was somewhat restrained in his first term, but the term he seeks now is a Revenge Tour and there will be no restraint.
Talking about it and doing it or using it are two completely different things an ocean apart.
. . . and off goes the fevered imagination again. Oh well.
I honestly don't care if you read it or not.
Yes, and the last time it was used was at the request of the California governor over the Rodney King incident when the police were let go free of charges.
Yet you have no reference in it for the Insurrection act. All my keyword searches provided nothing. Since you know it exists, you should be able to show us.
Yep. Prepare for the worse, hope for the best.
The staff was likely asked to prepare plans in case it was needed. This would be normal in any well run administration.
So you see much the talk is all lies then. Good!
Yeah, because Trump brought up that he was thinking of using it. So yes, if the President is going to say "I'm thinking of evoking X" then likely staff will draw up such an order.
The rioting after Floyd's death was rather extreme. I don't think most people would have objected if he stopped the rioting that way.
Have you even grasped the great irony of all of this yet?Probably because this thread is about Project 2025 and extremely different things are extremely ****ing different. It's sort of in the term.
Unless of course you are conditioned to believe and regurgitate here whatever hackish bullshit Fox sold most recently.
Marxism! pure ****ing hackery, that.
I see why it's wildly unpopular with tons of Americans.
They failed. They knew the impeachment was a joke because they know the Repug Nazi Party is a joke....just like everyone else with more than 2 brain cells.
Yes, it is absolutely unpopular. Enough so that it doesn't need to be lied about. Lying about it's contents just detracts from the facts there are.
As you speak of lying, you're planning on voting for Trump, correct?
Yes, but only as the lesser of two evils. I wish there was a good choice to make.
Agreed.
Democrats are rapidly moving to the 'left out' position on the political ball field.Ya just can't make this shit up!
Dude, you're voting for one of the biggest liars any of us have ever seen while criticizing people for lying.
The director of Heritage Foundation’s controversial Project 2025 announced he would step down on Tuesday, drawing cheers from former President Donald Trump’s campaign which has worked to distance itself from the right-wing initiative.Paul Dans told colleagues on Tuesday that he is leaving the project, The Post has confirmed.“Friends and patriots, to everything there is a season. We completed what we set out to do, which was to create a unified conservative vision, bringing together over 110 leading organizations united behind the cause of deconstructing the administrative state,” Dans wrote in an email first obtained by Politico.“President Trump’s campaign has been very clear for over a year that Project 2025 had nothing to do with the campaign, did not speak for the campaign, and should not be associated with the campaign or the President in any way,” Trump campaign senior advisers Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita said in a joint statement.“Reports of Project 2025’s demise would be greatly welcomed and should serve as notice to anyone or any group trying to misrepresent their influence with President Trump and his campaign— it will not end well for you,” Wiles and LaCivita said.
Director of Heritage Foundation’s ‘Project 2025’ steps down as Trump campaign calls for its ‘demise’
Paul Dans told colleagues on Tuesday that he is leaving the project, which Democrats used as a boogeyman against the Trump campaign.nypost.com
Another one bites the dust, hey, hey!!
Neither do you so stop being a hypocrite.
I don't care about words. I care about actions. He got some good legislation passed as president, and I like what most his actions were.
Yes, exactly.
Without question.
Some see the choice presented in the reality of the impact to the nation of that choice, some believe the lying, retconning, gaslighting Democrat allies in the MSM's manipulation to make their 'informed' choice.
Well we know this is bullshit. Biden was the target of impeachment the day after his inauguration. He hadn’t even adjusted the chair height at the Resolute desk before the Republican started looking for retribution for Trump’s two impeachments - just as they declared they would be doing, even before Biden trounced the lifelong recidivist criminal Trump in the election.
