Gamago25 said:Liberals would rather be a human shield defending an oppresive regime that abuses human rights, than to actually do what Ghandi and MLK did.
You should be ashamed.
Gandhi>Bush said:Beneath me?
Holding others back?
You're profile says you're 35. How in all of your years of wisdom and experience can you still be making generalizations about the otherside of the political spectrum and pulling words out of my mouth.
You want to see a peaceful democratic change in Iran. Hell yeah dude. I'm there. You want to talk about how to get that ball rolling let's do it, but if you want to make some more generalizations about my character or lack thereof, here is my response.
:moon:
That's right. The ass is red with anger!
Gandhi>Bush said:You know what dude, you really don't know me. You say I've done nothing. What have you done?
You also don't know how to spell Gandhi. It's in my fricking name no less.
And what's with this "libby" crap too? Do you hear me calling you a conservy? No. I'm 17, and I'm above generalizations and name calling. Go figure.
Gandhi>Bush said:An M4A1, in my eyes, is incapable of solving terrorism.
Gamago25 said:Im coming in with both barrels blazing because to me the "War on Terror" is simple.
Secularism in, Theocracy out.
Religous freedom in, Religous oppression Out.
Anyone got a probem, see my M4A1.
That is all.
:mrgreen:
Arch Enemy said:Do you honestly know how many "dead terrorists" it will take for all terrorism to stop? An infinite amount.
vandree said:Looks like I need to see your M4A1, because I don't believe that terrorism has anything to do with religion.
There is only one simple conclusion to draw from the war on terrorism and that's that we will never win. War and violence are only a temporary solution (if any at all). What we need to do is address the issues, the ciircumstances that lead to terrorism and take it from there.
And the US will insure that it's might is used to spread secularism, democracy, and religious freedoms throughout the Middle East.
Amnesty International: Human Rights Worldwide in Retreat
By Tom Rivers
London
25 May 2005
The London-based human-rights organization, Amnesty International, says respect for human rights across the world is on the slide, and the group says U.S. policy has a lot to do with that. The 308-page annual report highlights the state of human rights in nearly 150 countries.
Last year was not a good one as far as human rights goes. That is the conclusion of Amnesty International. Based on detailed information from 145 countries, the organization says governments are betraying their promise of a world order based on human rights.
Amnesty's Secretary General Irene Khan delivered her gloomy assessment.
"In 2004, far from any sign of principled leadership, what we saw was actually a new and dangerous agenda in the making," he said. "Rewriting the rules of human rights, discrediting institutions of international cooperation and usurping the language of justice and freedom to promote policies that create fear and insecurity."
Ms. Khan singled out Sudan, Zimbabwe, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Nepal, Uzbekistan, and Haiti as among the worst human-rights offenders.
Amnesty International says the United States, by its actions, is sending out a permissive signal to abusive governments and that is leading to more torture worldwide.
Ms. Khan says the United States must end, what she calls, its practice of indefinite detention, which she says is in breach of international law.
"Amnesty International is calling on the U.S. administration to close Guantanamo and disclose the rest," she said. "Either release the prisoners or charge and prosecute them with due process. By peddling the politics of fear and division, this new agenda has also encouraged intolerance, racism and xenophobia."
Amnesty International has been refused access to the prison camp. The Geneva-based International Committee of the Red Cross is the only independent group to have access to the Guantanamo detainees.
Amnesty's Khan says the United States sets the human rights standard worldwide and is the most important role model for other nations.
"The U.S., as the unrivaled political, military and economic super-power, sets the tone of government behavior worldwide," said Ms. Khan. "By thumbing its nose at the rule of law and human rights, what message does the U.S. send to repressive regimes who have little regard for international law anyway?"
Ms. Khan says several governments have openly defied human rights and international humanitarian law in the name of national security and "counter-terrorism."
Amnesty also criticizes the United Nations as being unable and unwilling to hold its member states to account. The report says the U.N. Commission on Human Rights has become a forum for horse-trading on human rights.
Among the few positive trends the group noted in 2004, were U.S. and British legal decisions curbing some anti-terror measures and what Amnesty calls a rise in human-rights activism.
The U.S. government has not responded to the Amnesty report, but a military spokesman says the United States continues to be a leader in human rights, treating detainees humanely and investigating all claims of abuse.
http://www.voanews.com/english/2005-05-25-voa48.cfm
Gandhi>Bush said:I'm pretty postitive he was joking. I think 1.2 billion is the population of muslims. I haven't seen in any such bigotry in other posts from him, I'm actually damned positive he was joking.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?