another "I hate black people" thread from volsrock on Christmas.
I see a pattern here
another "I hate black people" thread from volsrock on Christmas.
I see a pattern here
Brilliant. I bet you read about the Berlin attack, and rewrote the article in your mind as a case of Islamophobia against Anis Amri too.
Nope
I'm referring to volsrock and his non stop bigoted posts against blacks. reading comprehension isn't your strong suit.
Yes, I understand that his choice of subject matter isn't as pertinent as your endless pursuit of making lentils taste like meatloaf. Really pursuing the weighty issues there are you?
I just had some lentils, and they were to die for.
A feminized liberal male if I ever saw one.
White genocide" is a mythical figment of the "alt-right" (a.k.a. white supremacist) imagination.
https://twitter.com/ciccmaher?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^authorWeird, Breitbart thought this one was serious too
Nope
I'm referring to volsrock and his non stop bigoted posts against blacks. reading comprehension isn't your strong suit.
Only a black person can use the N-word. Only a redhead can use the G-word. And only a white person can call for white genicide.
So I don't see the problem.
I don't get it? Should we hate a racist white person that hates other white people. Or is this a hate all liberals because this one thinks he is clever, but fails hard? Or is it a PC action to ruin this guys life for a tweet, kind of thing?
No matter which one you pick, you're just doing something you hate liberals for doing to you...
Is Red the new Blue?
Would those who are fine with him calling for genocide as a joke also be fine with rape jokes?
How bout jokes about hanging blacks from trees?
Food for thought.
It is certainly a stupid opinion and quite disgusting. But it is an opinion and expressing it is and should be protected. This way he is a known idiot and can be debated or ridiculed. That is much better than his being unknown and hidden in obscurity.
another "I hate black people" thread from volsrock on Christmas.
I see a pattern here
Don't know, you'd have to ask one of them. I personally think it was dumb, and not worth our attention. People do stupid **** like this, just so we'll talk about them and judge them. Why give them what they want.
But Fanon was equally aware of the containment and counterinsurgency strategies that both Ferguson and Baltimore have inevitably generated. It’s not that the political opportunists and ambulance-chasers—the Al Sharptons of the world—misunderstand the power of riots. In fact, they understand it all-too-well, knowing that the threat posed by the people in the streets is their best ammunition when begging for crumbs from the system. Writing during the Algerian Revolution, Fanon showed that those who come out of the woodwork during a rebellion, positioning themselves as mediators and moderate voices—in short, as nonviolent—do so in a bid to reinforce their own authority:
Nonviolence is an attempt to settle the colonial problem around the negotiating table before the irreparable is done, before any bloodshed or regrettable act is committed. But if the masses, without waiting for the chairs to be placed around the negotiating table, take matters into their own hands and start burning… it is not long before we see the “elite” and the leaders… turn to the colonial authorities and tell them: “This is terribly serious! Goodness knows how it will all end. We must find an answer, we must find a compromise.”
If he's serious, what's stopping him from being the first one to go? Lead by example professor, not by rhetoric.
I guess idiocy isn't a disqualifier for a career in academia?
I'd like to see that, but I know that it'll never happen, much as is the same with all academia, they believe they are exempt from the consequences of their idiocy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?