• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Professor tweets ‘all I want for Christmas is white genocide’



If he's serious, what's stopping him from being the first one to go? Lead by example professor, not by rhetoric.
 
A feminized liberal male if I ever saw one.
 


Why is he still working at this school?
 
He sounds like an utter deplorable. One of his more recent books "Building the Commune: Radical Democracy in Venezuela".
 
Feel that progressive/communist love?

This POS is whats wrong with our colleges today!


If this idiot had said “Black or Muslim genocide” he would be out of a job, and under investigation by the FBI. And rightly so. However, because this is about hate for Whites, nothing will happen. No loss of job.
 
Last edited:
https://twitter.com/ciccmaher?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author

A look at Haiti now, even most of the bleeding hearts have given up on them, they never want to be better, they are addicted to being lazy victims.

.






MERRY CHRISTMAS

Uh....the white people running the show in Haiti were exceptionally corrupt, brutal and arrogant, even for slave owners of that time(which is saying a lot.)

They revolted against the French Republic and the Declaration of the Rights of Man. It didn't end well for them
 
His original Tweet that started the controversy read:
"All I Want for Christmas is White Genocide

— George Ciccariello (@ciccmaher) December 25, 2016"

This Tweet has been removed from Twitter. He should now Tweet
"All I want for Christmas is to still have a job in January!"

:lamo
 


If he's serious, what's stopping him from being the first one to go? Lead by example professor, not by rhetoric.


He's a "communist", by his own admission. People like him are why I have no faith in humans, too much stupid.
 

I conclude that it is adopting of the victim identity that did them in mostly.

The Haitians are unsalvageable till they decide they want to be better.

We should let them stew till/unless they decide they do.

We cant save everybody.



MERRY CHRISTMAS
 
Last edited:
He's a "communist", by his own admission. People like him are why I have no faith in humans, too much stupid.

There's always been guys like this floating around in academia. I doubt he'd give up his cushy job to actually live in a communist society, like he claims. Thankfully, this guy isn't representative of humans in anyway shape or form, as most people aren't stupid enough to rail against the system that gives them everything they have.
 

Protected from what?? He's working for a PRIVATE institution, his dumbass should be FIRED.

You are protected from GOVERNMENT action, not private action, from prison, fines and government legal action, not consequences for your own stupidity.
 
Protected from what?? He's working for a PRIVATE institution, his dumbass should be FIRED.

You are protected from GOVERNMENT action, not private action, from prison, fines and government legal action, not consequences for your own stupidity.

In a private institution he could be fired without direct Constitutional implications. Receiving Federal or State money might be a problem, though. I wonder how the school management and the people paying the tuition see it.
 
In a private institution he could be fired without direct Constitutional implications. Receiving Federal or State money might be a problem, though. I wonder how the school management and the people paying the tuition see it.

That whole "they might receive some federal monies so..." **** is a terrible thing, that should NOT matter. Only IF the Government were to say "You must fire him or we cut off funds/We're cutting off funds because of him"

Then it would be different.
 
This is no time for unity -- Trump must be confronted with relentless protest

Shocking of course.

This guy is an American citizen no less, born in the "woods of Maine" he says.






MERRY CHRISTMAS
 
Last edited:

It would certainly be worse. But using public money to do something indirectly that would be unconstitutional done directly is probably not quite legal and certainly not legitimate.
 
It would certainly be worse. But using public money to do something indirectly that would be unconstitutional done directly is probably not quite legal and certainly not legitimate.

If it has nothing to do with the money involved, not directed by the Government, it's NOT a constitutional issue. "we're sorry, you did this thing, and see, you get a grant for road access, so that would be the Government endorsing this action, you cannot do it"... What? No, that has to stop.
 
anybody advocating for genocide of anybody else is a complete buttwipe.
 

The problem with money is its indivisible nature. You cannot easily separate the origins of money that are used to pay for things.
 

The "victim ideology" did in the white colonists in Haiti? No, it was their own brutality and stupidity.

It's very easy to say when it's not your ass on the line to try and make things better.

Everybody whose tried before has died
 
another "I hate black people" thread from volsrock on Christmas.

I see a pattern here
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…