• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pro-abortion protesters target Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s home

Josie said:
Are people's thoughts part of your reading?
Click to expand...
News stories are.

If you are trying to get me to say anything is possible then yeah sure anything is.

But that's not how rights work. They have a right to protest, even if the kids are scared. Optically it would look bad sure, but they have that right regardless.
 
BlueTex said:
On what charges?
Click to expand...
18 US Code 115 specifies it's illegal to intimidate or attempt to intimidate a judge performing their official duties

After the would be assassin of Justice Kavanaugh was apprehended last week it's ridiculous to argue the protesters pose no danger or that they are just engaged in free speech.
 
NatMorton said:
Yes, in many states you can. Our legal system has long recognized a right to self defense.
Click to expand...


Bullshit.. In NO state can you shoot someone protesting on a public sidewalk...
 
AZRWinger said:
18 US Code 115 specifies it's illegal to intimidate or attempt to intimidate a judge performing their official duties

After the would be assassin of Justice Kavanaugh was apprehended last week it's ridiculous to argue the protesters pose no danger or that they are just engaged in free speech.
Click to expand...

As with everybody else on the right here, that's an argument against protesting in general, and you're not going to find a lot of allies willing to agree that all protesting should be banned.

That's why conservatives must necessarily end at the "it's illegal" goal post: every other argument against these protesters are so broad that they're automatically arguments against the act of protesting in totum.
 
AZRWinger said:
18 US Code 115 specifies it's illegal to intimidate or attempt to intimidate a judge performing their official duties

After the would be assassin of Justice Kavanaugh was apprehended last week it's ridiculous to argue the protesters pose no danger or that they are just engaged in free speech.
Click to expand...


LOL.... Hell, let's just make shit up...

18 US Code 115

Whoever—
(A) assaults, kidnaps, or murders, or attempts or conspires to kidnap or murder, or threatens to assault, kidnap or murder a member of the immediate family of a United States official, a United States judge, a Federal law enforcement officer, or an official whose killing would be a crime under section 1114 of this title; or
(B) threatens to assault, kidnap, or murder, a United States official, a United States judge, a Federal law enforcement officer, or an official whose killing would be a crime under such section,
with intent to impede, intimidate, or interfere with such official, judge, or law enforcement officer while engaged in the performance of official duties, or with intent to retaliate against such official, judge, or law enforcement officer on account of the performance of official duties, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
(2) Whoever assaults, kidnaps, or murders, or attempts or conspires to kidnap or murder, or threatens to assault, kidnap, or murder, any person who formerly served as a person designated in paragraph (1), or a member of the immediate family of any person who formerly served as a person designated in paragraph (1), with intent to retaliate against such person on account of the performance of official duties during the term of service of such person, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).

Let us know when someone does any of these...
 
Cardinal said:
As with everybody else on the right here, that's an argument against protesting in general, and you're not going to find a lot of allies willing to agree that all protesting should be banned.

That's why conservatives must necessarily end at the "it's illegal" goal post: every other argument against these protesters are so broad that they're automatically arguments against the act of protesting in totum.
Click to expand...
Another straw man argument. The issue is the thugs attempting to intimidate a SCOTUS justice at her home. Nothing in the comment so much as hints at the banning of all protest. That's why it's necessary to pretend it's something that it's not.
 
BlueTex said:
LOL.... Hell, let's just make shit up...

18 US Code 115

Whoever—
(A) assaults, kidnaps, or murders, or attempts or conspires to kidnap or murder, or threatens to assault, kidnap or murder a member of the immediate family of a United States official, a United States judge, a Federal law enforcement officer, or an official whose killing would be a crime under section 1114 of this title; or
(B) threatens to assault, kidnap, or murder, a United States official, a United States judge, a Federal law enforcement officer, or an official whose killing would be a crime under such section,
with intent to impede, intimidate, or interfere with such official, judge, or law enforcement officer while engaged in the performance of official duties, or with intent to retaliate against such official, judge, or law enforcement officer on account of the performance of official duties, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
(2) Whoever assaults, kidnaps, or murders, or attempts or conspires to kidnap or murder, or threatens to assault, kidnap, or murder, any person who formerly served as a person designated in paragraph (1), or a member of the immediate family of any person who formerly served as a person designated in paragraph (1), with intent to retaliate against such person on account of the performance of official duties during the term of service of such person, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).

Let us know when someone does any of these...
Click to expand...
Let us know when plain text comprehension is added to the skill set. It was violated last week at Justice Kavanaugh's home. Or, are Federal officers required to wait until Conservative justices and their families are kidnapped, assaulted or murdered by the mostly peaceful protesters.

Try 18 U.S. Code § 1507 for the rest of the thugs besieging Justice Barrett's family.

Of course no law is worth anything as long as favorites of the Biden regime are allowed to flaunt it with impunity.
 
AZRWinger said:
Another straw man argument. The issue is the thugs attempting to intimidate a SCOTUS justice at her home. Nothing in the comment so much as hints at the banning of all protest. That's why it's necessary to pretend it's something that it's not.
Click to expand...
Your reading comprehension needs work.
 
Carjosse said:
It is not harrassment, they are perfectly legitimate protests, on public property. There is nothing wrong with that. If they didn't want protests they shouldn't have become Supreme Court justices. That is what free speech is about.
Click to expand...
Like I said, a decent human being knows not to go after people in their homes. Those who don't are piece of shit human trash.
 
Josie said:
And since we know that America has violence on a daily basis, it's not irrational to be scared if you're a high-profile person who just made millions of people angry.
Click to expand...

We know that the Nazi democrats are violent and are unconstrained by law. That's the leadership, the rank and file are nothing but thugs.
 
Cardinal said:
Your reading comprehension needs work.
Click to expand...
There it is, can't comment on the issue rationally so make a false claim.

Again, pointing out the illegality of the thugs threatening Justice Barrett's family isn't a call to ban protests in general.
 
Fishking said:
Like I said, a decent human being knows not to go after people in their homes. Those who don't are piece of shit human trash.
Click to expand...
You know that if you don't sin, Jesus died for nothing
 
AZRWinger said:
There it is, can't comment on the issue rationally so make a false claim.

Again, pointing out the illegality of the thugs threatening Justice Barrett's family isn't a call to ban protests in general.
Click to expand...
Read it again. As slowly as it takes to comprehend it.
 
AZRWinger said:
There it is, can't comment on the issue rationally so make a false claim.

Again, pointing out the illegality of the thugs threatening Justice Barrett's family isn't a call to ban protests in general.
Click to expand...
Those justices should never be comfortable for the rest of their lives. They should live in fear until they die
 
Arlette said:
Those justices should never be comfortable for the rest of their lives. They should live in fear until they die
Click to expand...

How about people who agree with them?
 
tacomancer said:
Personally I would question whether their fear is rationally based, if they are just making an excuse, or if they are being prejudiced.
Click to expand...

I would personally question if democrats are capable of living in a free and peaceful society? This type of violence and terrorism seems to be baked into the fascists. Is it possible to reconcile with those who seek to destroy our constitution, civil rights, and the very concept of individuality? Like the Nazis they are so much like, can democrats be integrated into a civilized society?

Questionable.
 
Arlette said:
Those justices should never be comfortable for the rest of their lives. They should live in fear until they die
Click to expand...
There we go typical Marxist endorsement of mob rule.

Oh, a little lesson from the French revolution might be instructive. The revolutionaries put Robspierre in charge of terrorizing the enemies of the state in the name of freedom. He chopped off the heads of so-called enemies of the revolution until none remained. Naturally Robspierre was the next to be executed.
 
Arlette said:
Those justices should never be comfortable for the rest of their lives. They should live in fear until they die
Click to expand...

One thing about democrats, they are violent and evil - opponents of civilized society.
 
Fishking said:
Like I said, a decent human being knows not to go after people in their homes. Those who don't are piece of shit human trash.
Click to expand...
Unless I missed something, the protesters didn’t chase the Justices into their homes. As I understand it, the protesters remained on public property.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom