Pro-abortion protesters target Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s home

[BlueTex]

Well, it's the business of the government entity giving you the permission to protest.

You asked my opinion and I gave it.

Do you think people should protest abortion laws at the justices' kids' schools?

Permission to protest? WTF? Have you actually read the constitution?

 

[Josie]

Permission to protest? WTF? Have you actually read the constitution?

In some cases you do need a permit. Are you unaware of this?

Do you think that people should protest abortion laws outside of the justices’ kids’ schools? Third time I’ve asked.

 

[Josie]

Why would you need to ask for permission to protest?

For a Libertarian you seem to want to give the government a lot of control.

I don’t make the laws.

 

[BlueTex]

In some cases you do need a permit. Are you unaware of this?

Do you think that people should protest abortion laws outside of the justices’ kids’ schools? Third time I’ve asked.

Good lord... 20 protesters do not need a permit...

Would I protest? No... Is it LEGAL to protest outside of the justice's kids schools? Absolutely...

 

[BlueTex]

I don’t make the laws.

Are there federal permit laws for protesting in Virginia or Maryland?

 

[Josie]

Good lord... 20 protesters do not need a permit...

Didn’t say they did.

Would I protest? No... Is it LEGAL to protest outside of the justice's kids schools? Absolutely...

Why wouldn’t you?

 

[Josie]

Are there federal permit laws for protesting in Virginia or Maryland?

No idea. We’re in a general discussion about protests, not for specific states.

 

[BlueTex]

No idea. We’re in a general discussion about protests, not for specific states.

LOL... There are no federal permit requirements for protests in a state...

 

[Josie]

LOL... There are no federal permit requirements for protests in a state...

LOL. Ok?

 

[Rawley]

At the children? Well that's obviously false.

Do you think the kids have their own house.

As for the Justices, they're adults and it's a hard world. They can handle it. If pro-life activists could intimidate women going into clinics for fifty years, then protesters can make Justices a little uncomfortable. Also, I'm not inclined to grant privacy to people who removed privacy for every woman in America.

And when one your loons blows one of their brains out? No biggie, just part of the job, huh?

 

[Rawley]

Please show where I said I want that.
What I actually said was "Peaceful protests outside a Justices house are fine" which I stand by.

"If they didn't want the possibility of this happening then they shouldn't have become Justices."

You do know that one of the loons you support tried to assassinate Kanvanaugh. No big deal, right? Just part of the job, huh?

 

[Slartibartfast]

Do you think the kids have their own house.

It’s unfortunate that kids have to experience people being loud and rude sometimes.

I wonder how many kids are going to be harmed by global warming in light of the recent EPA decision.

And when one your loons blows one of their brains out? No biggie, just part of the job, huh?

They have security

 

[Rawley]

So?

Follow the thread backwards if you really want that answered

 

[Rawley]

It’s unfortunate that kids have to experience people being loud and rude sometimes.

I wonder how many kids are going to be harmed by global warming in light of the recent EPA decision.

If they have their way, all of them will die. Slow painful deaths.

They have security

So you are comfortable with the way the left has chosen to roll? I find if disgusting, dangerous and harmful to our society.

 

[Slartibartfast]

If they have their way, all of them will die. Slow painful deaths.

All people will die? I don’t think global warming is going to be quite that devastating.

So you are comfortable with the way the left has chosen to roll? I find if disgusting, dangerous and harmful to our society.

So far it’s just been one crazy dude who I condemn. To automatically conflate protest with danger is just how you choose to view people unlike you.

Protest though has been the catalyst for a lot of positive change in this country, women's suffrage, ending child labor, civil rights, ending the Vietnam war, etc. protesting is a social force for good.

 

[Rawley]

All people will die?

No, as you said, just the children. That's the plan at least.

So far it’s just been one crazy dude who I condemn. To automatically conflate protest with danger is just how you choose to view people unlike you.

No, I don't march outside anyone's homes screaming "**** YOU" at their children. Those are people like you?

 

[Slartibartfast]

No, as you said, just the children. That's the plan at least.

Cite this plan. There is no credible reason to think anyone wants children to die.

No, I don't march outside anyone's homes screaming "**** YOU" at their children. Those are people like you?

Can you cite they specifically they meant the children and not the justices with the kids being in earshot?

If they did that, then they should be less rude while protesting but it does not mean the protesting itself is wrong. That will not help sympathy for their cause.

 

[Rawley]

Cite this plan. There is no credible reason to think anyone wants children to die.

So why do you post stupid shit like this "I wonder how many kids are going to be harmed by global warming in light of the recent EPA decision." When we're discussing the assholes protesting outside of the justices homes?

Can you cite they specifically they meant the children and not the justices with the kids being in earshot?

If they did that, then they should be less rude while protesting but it does not mean the protesting itself is wrong. That will not help sympathy for their cause.

Duh. But you are supporting them. The President supports them. Your entire party supports and cheers them on.

 

[Slartibartfast]

So why do you post stupid shit like this "I wonder how many kids are going to be harmed by global warming in light of the recent EPA decision." When we're discussing the assholes protesting outside of the justices homes?

So people making statements based on stark and uncomfortable reality on social media is a plan?

Do we need to review the definition of that word now?

Duh. But you are supporting them. The President supports them. Your entire party supports and cheers them on.

Yup. Protesting has been a positive force for social change.

Now can you cite that people are specifically targeting kids with their protest versus kids just happening to be in houses around the protests or are you backing off that now?

 

[Peter]

"If they didn't want the possibility of this happening then they shouldn't have become Justices."

You do know that one of the loons you support tried to assassinate Kanvanaugh. No big deal, right? Just part of the job, huh?

Yes, and they will be put in prison for doing so.
So you want to ban freedom of speech because someone might possibly do something ilegal?

In that case then all republicans should be banned from any kind of protest anywhere because of the attack on the capital building.

 

[Peter]

So people making statements based on stark and uncomfortable reality on social media is a plan?

Do we need to review the definition of that word now?

Yup. Protesting has been a positive force for social change.

Now can you cite that people are specifically targeting kids with their protest versus kids just happening to be in houses around the protests or are you backing off that now?

The UK had some huge protests held in London not long ago because of all the cuts to public sector workers pay due to austerity.
Hundreds of thousands marched through London on many occasions in peaceful marches and they had public support even though they shut down entire sections of the city.
Protest has been a force for good for generations on both sides of the pond.

 

[Cardinal]

Do you think the kids have their own house.

The statement I was responding to makes the implication that the kids are the intended targets. Obviously that's false.

And when one your loons blows one of their brains out? No biggie, just part of the job, huh?

Then that would be murder and not protesting.

 

[Fishking]

How can they influence a decision that already happened? Telling a judge they are politicized and make bad decisions is not influencing. Should it be illegal to criticize Supreme Court justices and their rulings? Because that is what is what it sounds like you are advocating.

You openly oppose free speech.

Because it's still pressure for how they ruled happening. It's showing that the SCOTUS members WILL be targeted for their rulings before, during, and after. This isn't complicated.

 

[Peter]

Because it's still pressure for how they ruled happening. It's showing that the SCOTUS members WILL be targeted for their rulings before, during, and after. This isn't complicated.

If they can't handle public criticism for decisions they make they shouldn't be Justices.

Every decision they make is going to piss someone off and may be protested.

 

[Fishking]

If they can't handle public criticism for decisions they make they shouldn't be Justices.

Every decision they make is going to piss someone off and may be protested.

They can protest at the court building. Going after people in their homes is harassment and in this case illegal. Also, you're a ****ing dirtbag if you do it, so there's that too.