- Joined
- Jul 5, 2011
- Messages
- 3,813
- Reaction score
- 2,874
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Well, the first scenario is obviously false since the autopsy revealed no entry wounds to the back of Brown. The last part of the second is also false as there was no powder residue on Brown.
You are trying hard to deny a little factoid ruining a "good story"It's false only if you assume that Wilson would have hit Brown when he was shooting at his back.
History often tells us that cops miss many, many shots.
You are trying hard to deny a little factoid ruining a "good story"
Unbelievable.
Private autopsy?
Are their companies that do private, for profit autopsies?
'Your husband died but the insurance company won't believe it wasn't suicide? Then call the professionals at Baker and Son...where we have been doing autopsies for two generations. We will get to the truth. And for an extra charge, we will even create the truth.
Just call us at 555-7522. That's 555-SLAB'
I think Richard Sherman got it right when he said thug is the new n word. Had you just stuck with that you'd have more wiggle room but thugs supporting their bruthas... Kind of telegraphing your race baiting juuuuuust a bit.
Thug is the new "n" word? No, Rob. The word thug is a few hundred years old and has been used for generations to describe criminals, robbers, petty thieves, tough guys, etc. There is no racism in that word, unless you're looking for and desperately trying to bring race into a word.
See below. As a lilly-white Irish person, I assure you, "thug" has nothing to do with race. Ever been to Boston?
:yt
It irks me to no end. IMHO, that argument is the debate equivalent of, "I dunno... so GOD."
Hmmm... "I dunno... so RACE!" :roll:
It's 2014, people. Douchebags come in a variety of colors AND professions.
There's no proof of that. The video of it is sketchy.
It's false only if you assume that Wilson would have hit Brown when he was shooting at his back.
History often tells us that cops miss many, many shots.
It's false only if you assume that Wilson would have hit Brown when he was shooting at his back.
History often tells us that cops miss many, many shots.
This is all liberals have today in the face of their bold lies, and deception. In this they kneejerk jumped from day one to the side of misinformation, and Law Enforcement bashing. Now that the facts are dribbling out and looking more and more like the officer was totally justified in using the force he used, they jump straight to the racist slur. Not only are they unimaginative, but they are lazy in their debate skills as well.
Every so often liberals let their true colors shine through. Once I see this behavior, its hard to ever take them seriously, but they aren't funny either.
What "factoid" is that?
What is crazy is even if it comes out that the cop did 'wrong' in any way, they have killed any point they were trying to make with the pre-judging and race baiting nonsense. Not to mention they have never apologized for being wrong in the end, they just keep marching as if the narrative that was proven wrong, was never proven wrong.
Thug is the new "n" word? No, Rob. The word thug is a few hundred years old and has been used for generations to describe criminals, robbers, petty thieves, tough guys, etc. There is no racism in that word, unless you're looking for and desperately trying to bring race into a word.
I guess thats another word that white people cant say anymore.
Jeez can black people ever not be offended?
That he wasn't shot in the back........
Think of the delusional thinking here-this is simply a mob of pissed off people looking for any excuse-lies are good enough an excuse.
Of course it has never been about the truth, as the truth has never, EVER, been anywhere close to people like Al Sharpton. But they don't care, it is misery and hate that fuels their bank accounts, not truth or justice.
Thug is the new "n" word? No, Rob. The word thug is a few hundred years old and has been used for generations to describe criminals, robbers, petty thieves, tough guys, etc. There is no racism in that word, unless you're looking for and desperately trying to bring race into a word.
This is all liberals have today in the face of their bold lies, and deception. In this they kneejerk jumped from day one to the side of misinformation, and Law Enforcement bashing. Now that the facts are dribbling out and looking more and more like the officer was totally justified in using the force he used, they jump straight to the racist slur. Not only are they unimaginative, but they are lazy in their debate skills as well.
That he wasn't shot in the back........
Thanks for speaking for all liberals. BTW you are terrible at it. Guy dropped in saying thugs an bruthas.... Not me.
His sentiments are still spot on.
I'm not saying the word itself is new. Its meaning is appearing to adapt. Like...that's cool. Or that's hot almost meaning the same thing. Meanings often evolve.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?