Well, the first scenario is obviously false since the autopsy revealed no entry wounds to the back of Brown. The last part of the second is also false as there was no powder residue on Brown.
Just his body, or his clothes?
Lies. If he had been standing and running with his head bent forward then the bullet would have went through his eye and then hit the bottom of his skull, near the neck. This isnt what happened. The bullet went through his eye, out the bottom of his jaw and into his collar bone. This indicates he was laying down when shot. Why is everyone ignoring this fact? Because it shatters the little reality they have crafted for themselves.
That's funny that you say that, I also watched CNN last night. For some reason I ended up on Nancy Grace's show (dear Lord, what an insufferable bitch she is) then went on to Dr. Drew, who had some hysterical bimbo with him who was losing her marbles and flailing about, refuting the commentary of a former Secret Service agent, a former cop, and a psychiatrist who were all giving their opinions that didn't fit the "the cop shot Brown in cold blood" chant.
It was embarrassing for these people to say the least. How can CNN pay some of them for being so stupid?
Over the years, I have tried repeatedly. I just can't watch CNN on an ongoing basis. It always makes me feel like I'm watching the children's news hour. I watch it if I'm on vacation somewhere, and staying in a hotel room, but a steady diet of it would just give me indigestion. :lol:
The 18-year old Black man who was shot 6- times and is now dead and buried isn't worried about what's for breakfast tomorrow.
That's a fact that you can bet your last dollar on.
So no one wants to riot over the black protester who was shot by police the other night? Hmm typical.
Actually, someone pointed out that members of the Washington Redskins showed support for the protesters in Ferguson prior to last night's football game - my comment was directed at that comment. I don't think I was unnecessarily racial nor was I wrong. The NFL is, indeed, loaded with a bunch of lawless thugs, if news reports and almost weekly reports of one or another getting mixed up with guns, drugs, assaults, gangs, murder, or you name it. Sorry if you don't like the truth, but it's clear as day.
Now, Go Steelers!!
I think that is a realistic assessment, however, we should keep in mind that there are other possible scenarios. But, keeping in mind that Michael Brown knew that he has just committed a robbery, I imagine his reaction to the cop was defensive at the very least. Whether the Cop knew he had committed a crime or not is irrelevant, Michael Brown knew he had, and he didn't know the cop didn't know he had.
Why would he run from the gun. Then turn around and run back at the gun? I think its most likely the cop tried to punk him. Pulled him by his neck with a hand hook around his neck. Brown punched the cop and ran. The cop shot at Brown from the car (and it most likely missed). Brown became scared of the gunshots, stop and surrendered. Laying down as his friend, the witness described and then the cop hit him with bullets. Which explains how a bullet could go down through his head and into his collar bone. No one runs with their head straight down facing the ground and hunched over like a hunch back. To make the collar bone and eye socket line up you would have to be laying down. Go ahead and try it. Lean over and bend your head until your eye socket and collar bone run parrallel to the ground. Good luck running like that.
If a person is interested in the truth, they would let the investigation occur first. But that isn't what this is all about in my opinion.
Guess the original witnesses that started the "hands up" story are back tracking from what they originally said. And it is being reported and verified by the District Attorney's office the officer received an orbital blowout fracture from his encounter with Brown.
Their statements will be compared against each other, those of other eye witnesses, and the physical evidence. Not taken at face value.
Just his body, or his clothes?
They have already released pictures of Wilson. You think if he had a caved in orbital they would be trumping a picture of it all over the news. I mean they stooped to releasing unrelated surveillance of the robbery so why wouldnt they show the cops battered face? Just curious.
Private autopsy?
Are their companies that do private, for profit autopsies?
'Your husband died but the insurance company won't believe it wasn't suicide? Then call the professionals at Baker and Son...where we have been doing autopsies for two generations. We will get to the truth. And for an extra charge, we will even create the truth.
Just call us at 555-7522. That's 555-SLAB'
I think Richard Sherman got it right when he said thug is the new n word. Had you just stuck with that you'd have more wiggle room but thugs supporting their bruthas... Kind of telegraphing your race baiting juuuuuust a bit.
Go Georgia bulldogs!
Thug is the new "n" word? No, Rob. The word thug is a few hundred years old and has been used for generations to describe criminals, robbers, petty thieves, tough guys, etc. There is no racism in that word, unless you're looking for and desperately trying to bring race into a word.
This is all liberals have today in the face of their bold lies, and deception. In this they kneejerk jumped from day one to the side of misinformation, and Law Enforcement bashing. Now that the facts are dribbling out and looking more and more like the officer was totally justified in using the force he used, they jump straight to the racist slur. Not only are they unimaginative, but they are lazy in their debate skills as well.
I think that is a realistic assessment, however, we should keep in mind that there are other possible scenarios. But, keeping in mind that Michael Brown knew that he has just committed a robbery,
This is all liberals have today in the face of their bold lies, and deception. In this they kneejerk jumped from day one to the side of misinformation, and Law Enforcement bashing. Now that the facts are dribbling out
There's no proof of that. The video of it is sketchy.
They have already released pictures of Wilson. You think if he had a caved in orbital they would be trumping a picture of it all over the news. I mean they stooped to releasing unrelated surveillance of the robbery so why wouldnt they show the cops battered face? Just curious.
I said "most likely". Its just a theory.
And that's the trouble w/conservatives--whenever they say the "facts are dribbling out", and we ask them to cite them from credible sources, they just run around the mulberry bush.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?