I don’t believe her. Like I said, when she was the district attorney for San Francisco she signed an
amicus curiae brief supporting Washington, D.C.’s handgun ban.
Talk about a
non sequitur. So because the pit bull has a muzzle on it I can be confident that it won’t hurt me? That still doesn’t change the fact that she’s a hypocrite who wants to ban a particular class of
semi-automatic weapons only because they look scary. She’s a danger to the Second Amendment, and Elon is right when he says she’s a threat to the First as well.
She’s a hypocrite who calls Trump a threat to freedom when
she’s the threat. I’m not going to assume she won’t try to use her executive authority to bypass Congress when she’s already indicated she would. Liberals do that. They’ve basically thumbed their noses at the
Bruen decision in which states are supposed to establish objective criteria for the issuance of concealed-carry permits. Just try getting one in Kamala’s home state of California, where they trample on the Constitution every day.
I don’t know what she’d do. Obama said he’d unite the country. He lied. The reality was he was extremely race centric. Remember “Yes we can, ” Change we can believe in,” and “Forward”? Kamala’s just the same bullshit in a different package. As soon as she’s elected she’ll zero in on the woke social justice crap the left-wing caucus in her party wants her to focus on, because these are the loud-mouthed idiots who control it. The plight of working-class white people, especially males, in Flyover Country will be an afterthought.
Your constitution-trampling hypocrite friends are lying. Some of the “assault weapons,” liberals want banned are in reality just scary-looking handguns:
View attachment 67536555
How many times do you want me to say it? She supported banning handguns in Washington, D.C. Why would she not do it elsewhere if given an opportunity? She’s not going to lift a finger to support gun owners.
Kamala can bite me. That’s the truth.