I would argue that it is 'now'. As the world integrates and everything is digitized and then networked, this is warfare of the future. It doesn't matter if the enemy has an excellent IAD's network if you can broadcast a signal that causes every piece of hardware to fry itself.
......As the world integrates and everything is digitized and then networked, this is warfare of the future........
I would argue that it is 'now'. As the world integrates and everything is digitized and then networked, this is warfare of the future. It doesn't matter if the enemy has an excellent IAD's network if you can broadcast a signal that causes every piece of hardware to fry itself.
Mya said:*One of the most sophisticated pieces of malicious software ever discovered, with about 20 times as much code as Stuxnet.
LOL because length of code means anything at all. :roll:
Sorry, I just find these type of articles written by non-tech people hilarious. Maybe Wired will do an article on this.
:roll: yourselfLOL because length of code means anything at all. :roll:
Sorry, I just find these type of articles written by non-tech people hilarious. Maybe Wired will do an article on this.
This is warfare of today.
LOL because length of code means anything at all. :roll:
Sorry, I just find these type of articles written by non-tech people hilarious. Maybe Wired will do an article on this.
prove your point
Oh my. We should go over there and blow them to bits shouldn't we?
Wait...did they not tell you. Many nations come out with pretty kick ass software like this. It is a continuously evolving process. It's certainly not advertised because it would show a weakness in the nations defense unless...they wanted you to see it. Not to scare you or nothing. China was actually the last publicized one to be doing this against us. I'm sure everyone is, though, including our allies.
But Iran...Something about that place that just says "Kick 'em" isn't there?
What makes anyone think we are not already prepared for this? Note that none of these attacks made it to the US. So far as we know, lol.
The government has been hiring code writers, software engineers, and even hackers, for years. There are plenty of people on defense dept payroll who got "scouted" by the FBI first, lol.
I already did prove my point. Length of code means nothing; the reporter that wrote that article definitely does not know much about what he is talking about. I will read the Wired article for a better source.
You have proven nothing, you stated a singular element of what was provided was meaningless. Kindly provide a source for your position and be more dispositive regarding the issues presented.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?