Oh yes. We should absolutely force religious institutions to accept anyone regardless of their own beliefs because that's religious freedom! :roll:
That should only happen if they're getting tax dollars.
So let me get this straight *no pun intended*
Any organization who receives any tax payer money should be forced to accept any member regardless of their own beliefs or if it goes against the very nature of the organization?
So in effect, a gay advocacy group that receives any tax payer money should be forced to accept any pro life anti gay person who applies for any job as long as they meet the scholastic qualifications?
Can you see where this is leading?
I'm with the pope on this one.
Freedom of religion has to go both ways for it to mean anything. Religion needs to keep the hell out of government, and government needs to keep the hell out of religion.
Besides, you can't force acceptance on people.
Freedom of religion has to go both ways for it to mean anything. Religion needs to keep the hell out of government, and government needs to keep the hell out of religion.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...
What's wrong with discriminating against gay people?
Discrimination as a whole is unacceptable.
I don't think an organisation or employer should be allowed to have the ability to reject someone who is perfectly capable of doing the job on the basis of their skin colour, religious beliefs or sexual preference.
If it doesn't affect the job, it is not anyones business.
What's wrong with discriminating against gay people?
MYTH: The Equality Bill will force churches to hire gay priests.
RESPONSE: Everyone should be protected from discrimination and should have the right to be treated fairly in employment and in other areas of life. The Equality Bill recognises and protects people’s rights to hold and manifest religious belief. It also protects gay men, lesbians and bisexual people from being discriminated against. Where such rights have the potential to come into conflict, the Bill strikes an appropriate balance between them.
The Equality Bill will not change the existing legal position regarding churches and employment. It clarifies the existing law to ensure a balance is maintained between the rights of people to manifest their religion and the right of employees not to be discriminated against because of a protected characteristic such as sexual orientation.
In the case of Ministers of Religion and other jobs which exist to promote and represent religion, the Bill recognises that a church may need to impose requirements regarding sexual orientation, sex, marriage and civil partnership or gender reassignment if it is necessary to comply with its teachings or the strongly held beliefs of followers. However, it would not be right to permit such requirements across all jobs within organised religions, such as administrators and accountants, and the Equality Bill makes this clear.
Government should not be telling religion what they should be doing in regards to their religious practices, of which who their priest is is one.
It amazes me that people who bitch and moan at some on the right who are way overboard in calling for the restrictions and action against the more archaic beliefs of Islam have no issue jumping on the bandwagon of putting restrictiosn and action against Christianity.
Actually no, it doesn't amaze me, which is even sadder.
In the case of Ministers of Religion and other jobs which exist to promote and represent religion, the Bill recognises that a church may need to impose requirements regarding sexual orientation, sex, marriage and civil partnership or gender reassignment if it is necessary to comply with its teachings or the strongly held beliefs of followers. However, it would not be right to permit such requirements across all jobs within organised religions, such as administrators and accountants, and the Equality Bill makes this clear
I don't disagree, but the point here is that it DOES affect the job.
Muslims will also be answerable to these laws. It's not like it applies only to Christians.
If a Mosque employer is caught discriminating against a Gay person for the position of an accountant because of their sexuality. The consequences will be the same
This is just trolling since obviously the sexual abuse is NOT done in the name of Christianity.Link
BBC News - Pope Benedict attacks government over Equality Bill
This from someone whose minions have sexually assaulted hundreds if not thousands of young children in their care.
Naturally all in the name of some archaic mumbo jumbo religion.
Government should not be telling religion what they should be doing in regards to their religious practices, of which who their priest is is one.
It amazes me that people who bitch and moan at some on the right who are way overboard in calling for the restrictions and action against the more archaic beliefs of Islam have no issue jumping on the bandwagon of putting restrictiosn and action against Christianity.
Total and utter nonsense, since it violates freedom of association. The people that go to those churches are also taxpayers so they that the right to reject such a person.Exactly! If they're qualified, you can't reject them because you don't like their religion or sexual orientation. That part is none of your business and if you don't like it, then you have to give up your tax subsidies.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?