Yes you have been from the very start.You have been thoroughly defeated. You're now dismissed.
See there you go again. No answer and making false statements. There were no rouge cops.Yeah right, going by rogue cops' words as if they were gold. Of course they had to say that into the mic they were wearing in order to justify beating the crap out of a person who were merely reacting reflexively to being beaten and crushed to death. Just take a look at the video and then look at your self into the mirror. That's all you have to do.
See there you go again, No answer and making false statements. There were no rouge cops.
You dismiss yourself with these illogical claims you make.
He was resiting.
Most folks are smart enough to know when to stop, even if reflexive. Apparently Kelly and you both don't know that though
You 're dismissed, don't you know that?Yes you have been from the very start.
You just are unable to realize that.
AS for dismissing?
iLOL
All of your illogical rantings where dismissed by factual information.
Kelly was resisting. You even tacitly admit it by saying it was reflexive. Something which you know not.
You 're dismissed, don't you know that?
Did I ever say the officers testified? You can't even comprehend what you're reading and you want to participate in a debate? Like I said, go play with yourself and stop whining like a five year old throwing a tantrum.Your arguments have been dismissed. We know that. Yet here you are still replying. Figures.
So again.
You dismiss yourself with the illogical claims you make.
He was resiting.
Most folks are smart enough to know when to stop, even if reflexive. Apparently Kelly and you both don't know that though.
Btw, you apparently missed it, the Officers didn't testify.
That was the lawyer using the video evidence to point out what was happening.
Again - Using the video evidence to point out what happened.
That is what the Jury used to make their decision. The video evidence.
Next.
You have been thoroughly defeated. You're now dismissed.
Did I say you did?Did I ever say the officers testified?
Yeah right, going by rogue cops' words as if they were gold.
Said the only one acting in such a fashion.Like I said, go play with yourself and stop whining like a five year old throwing a tantrum.
The evidence says you are wrong on all counts. Go figure.He HAS been MORE THAN thoroughly defeated. Anybody who ignores the facts of audio-visual evidence, and keeps parroting the same lies over and over regardless of how articulate you are in explaining why his view is not conducive to reality, is displaying shill-like behavior. I had him pegged after just 2 posts, so why feed into it? Should never have wasted another minute on it.
I do not disagree. I was just wondering what you might suggest as a response if you start getting your ass beat anyway.Being polite and not resisting helps a lot in avoiding an ass whippin'
An old and true educational video
.
Not once could you point out any lie said by me, especially as the facts do not lie. And those facts defeat what you assert.
Kelly was resisting.
You are fooling no one with that bs.That's one lie you keep spouting over and over and over and over again as if you expect us to suddenly believe you and not what our own eyes and ears tell us. You have eyes and ears too, and assuming you're not too blind to see that this 135 lb. weakling is pinned down by 5 cops being beaten, tasered, bludgeoned, and crushed - and assuming also that you're not too deaf to hear him pleading stop I'm not resisting, you're a liar and you are fooling NOBODY. I'd like to hear from somebody with a valid argument who is not in the fantasy world you appear to be in, mindlessly regurgitating your erroneous opinion that is in direct contradiction to what is shown in the video. Please go away or get a clue. YOU"RE FOOLING NO ONE.
You are fooling no one with that bs.
He was resisting.
It is in the video to see.
The Officers can be heard telling him to stop resisting, and one stating that he was fighting.
So stop with telling lies.
Kelly was clearly resisting.
His refusal to comply with the order to gut on the ground coupled with his then attempting to flee, is resistance as well.
An yet here you are dishonestly saying he wasn't resiting.
:doh
You are again speaking about yourself. Figures.You are annoying, deceitful, displaying the characteristics of a shill, and have no respect for basic rules of debate. I'm putting you on ignore now.
WTF? :dohGo take your meds. Goodbye. Loser.
I do not disagree. I was just wondering what you might suggest as a response if you start getting your ass beat anyway.
That's one lie you keep spouting over and over and over and over again as if you expect us to suddenly believe you and not what our own eyes and ears tell us. You have eyes and ears too, and assuming you're not too blind to see that this 135 lb. weakling is pinned down by 5 cops being beaten, tasered, bludgeoned, and crushed - and assuming also that you're not too deaf to hear him pleading stop I'm not resisting, you're a liar and you are fooling NOBODY. I'd like to hear from somebody with a valid argument who is not in the fantasy world you appear to be in, mindlessly regurgitating your erroneous opinion that is in direct contradiction to what is shown in the video. Please go away or get a clue. YOU"RE FOOLING NO ONE.
If you try to reason with an EDP or drunk, you are asking for an ass-kicking. It's that simple.
The US Supreme Court has ruled LEOs are not required to use the minimum amount of force, but reasonable force and yes, there are times where an officer can and should talk to a suspect and attempt to reason with them but there are times when you can't and should not attempt to.
Policy, procedures, the LAW * the LAW* and experience come into play....The thing is COMPLY WITH THE COMMANDS THE FIRST TIME and avoid, the ass whippin
Nice try.
Policies and procedures are always broken regularly, just like this case.
Excessive force was used.
To hard for those groupthink morons jacked up on adrenaline to know when to quit.
Happens every day.
I see you are not paying attention. Figures. The thread I quoted you from is about the rally for him.He was on the ground before they tazed him. Did you watch the video, or not? At one point the officers comment on how much blood there is, but continue. I don't see why it took 6 officers to bring him in. It only took 3 officers to do that to me when they hauled me to the loony bin, had me on the floor of my house, cuffed me up and that was that. He said many times, "I can't breathe," and "Okay, okay,," That's resisting arrest? :lamo You have no idea what you saw if you watched it. Here, I'll link it so you can finally inform yourself a little.
[video=youtube_share;e6yaeD-E_MY]http://youtu.be/e6yaeD-E_MY[video]
I see you are not paying attention. Figures. The thread I quoted you from is about the rally for him.
And I have already told you there are other threads where this is thoroughly discussed. And yet, here you are still trying to take the thread off topic.
Strange indeed.
So lets bring it to one of those appropriate threads.
He was on the ground before they tazed him? OMG! Call the Police!
So what. He was resiting so much that they tased him. So what?
And it had no effect.
They commented on blood? OMG he was bleeding and still resisting. So what?
You don't see why it took 6 Officers? You do not see why while ignoring that multiple tasering had no effect. Strange.
He was resisting, that is why.
It only took three for you? And?
Are you Kelly? Why no, you are not. Duh!
Different situation and things happen with different people.
Next.
Yes he did say I couldn't breath. And?
You do realize that the mere fact that he could say that, says he could breath. Which means he was lying at that point.
Just like he was lying previously about his name and his ability to understand and do what he was told.
I already provided you the link, may be you should have read what was there.
This claim of his was put into proper perspective by experts.
That is resisting arrest? Yes he was resisting arrest. It is obvious in the video.
Kelly was in the wrong. Had he not resisted he would still be alive.
:naughtyHere is a better perspective.
Getting your head smashed into concrete repeatedly.
View attachment 67161001
If you try to reason with an EDP or drunk, you are asking for an ass-kicking. It's that simple.
The US Supreme Court has ruled LEOs are not required to use the minimum amount of force, but reasonable force and yes, there are times where an officer can and should talk to a suspect and attempt to reason with them but there are times when you can't and should not attempt to.
Policy, procedures, the LAW * the LAW* and experience come into play....The thing is COMPLY WITH THE COMMANDS THE FIRST TIME and avoid, the ass whippin
Police not guilty in Kelly Thomas death; DA won't try 3rd officer - latimes.com
I just got a text about this a few minutes ago. Wow. Wow wow. That's all I can say. I can't believe that they were found not guilty on all charges.
You should really follow you own advice.Take a step back and reassess it from the beginning.
No it wasn't.Deadly force was used.
:naughtyIn question here, is whether the leo's feared for their life enough to warrant the deadly force.
Bs! Kelly failed to comply and then decided to flee. The use of a baton to gain compliance was appropriate.When the cop instructed Thomas to get down on the ground, Thomas remained standing. They knew, however, that Thomas had a mental condition, and they knew he was unarmed. He wasn't a threat in any way, so they never should have had their batons out.
:dohIf you actually believe 5 cops could not subdue and cuff this 135 lb. homeless guy in a matter of 15 seconds, then you lack the knowledge or skills required to make these assessments.
Nothing but bs, and is contradicted by the actual evidence in the video.All factors considered, it's unreasonable to say he could not have been subdued and cuffed without any bludgeoning or blows thrown at all.
Just more meaningless bs.... you can hear bystanders saying "just cuff him already!". That's not something you would hear anybody say if it didn't appear that it could be done.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?