• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Please not another Benghazi hearing.

I thought you where a fiscal conservative Mycroft. If so then you should be outraged by this waist of money and time.

Are you suggesting I would condone giving up truth because it "costs too much"?

James, I would like to believe that no matter what a person's Party or lean, being truthful and expecting truth from everyone would be very important. Even worth spending money to ensure those who are NOT truthful are exposed and held accountable.

Obviously, you don't agree.
 
What part of nothing found does the right not understand? They are fishing and everybody knows it Mycroft. Isn't it obvious?

When nothing is found because of lies, cover ups, delaying tactics and outright hiding and destroying information that is the time when efforts to learn the truth are even more important.

Despicable, callous and corrupt government officials should NOT be allowed to escape justice because they've hid the truth.
 
Uh oh. :shock: Looks like Gowdy will have some more ammo to play with thanks to Judicial Watch. Good thing he postponed Hillary's trying to make a one appearance showing.


Confirmed: Weapons Were Moving Through Benghazi to Syria

Today, Fox News' Catherine Herridge is reporting on documents showing weapons were in fact being trafficked between the two countries. Further, Herridge reports another aspect in which the White House lied about the attack.

A Defense Intelligence Agency memo from Sept. 16, 2012, concluded that the Benghazi terror attack was planned at least 10 days in advance to coincide with 9/11 and was in retaliation for a drone strike that killed an al Qaeda strategist. The memo was copied to the National Security Council, the State Department and the CIA.

“The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for the [U.S.] killing of Aboyahiye (Alaliby) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center buildings,” the memo said.

Judicial Watch obtained the memos by suing in federal court.....snip~

Confirmed: Weapons Were Moving Through Benghazi to Syria - Katie Pavlich
 
Uh oh. :shock: Looks like Gowdy will have some more ammo to play with thanks to Judicial Watch. Good thing he postponed Hillary's trying to make a one appearance showing.


Confirmed: Weapons Were Moving Through Benghazi to Syria

Today, Fox News' Catherine Herridge is reporting on documents showing weapons were in fact being trafficked between the two countries. Further, Herridge reports another aspect in which the White House lied about the attack.

A Defense Intelligence Agency memo from Sept. 16, 2012, concluded that the Benghazi terror attack was planned at least 10 days in advance to coincide with 9/11 and was in retaliation for a drone strike that killed an al Qaeda strategist. The memo was copied to the National Security Council, the State Department and the CIA.

“The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for the [U.S.] killing of Aboyahiye (Alaliby) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center buildings,” the memo said.

Judicial Watch obtained the memos by suing in federal court.....snip~

Confirmed: Weapons Were Moving Through Benghazi to Syria - Katie Pavlich

Interesting, IIRC Rand Paul asked Hillary specifically about this during her testimony.

Hillary continues to obfuscate, but the more she tries the closer she will be examined.
This is an albatross around her neck she'd be smart to shake by coming clean.
 
Interesting, IIRC Rand Paul asked Hillary specifically about this during her testimony.

Hillary continues to obfuscate, but the more she tries the closer she will be examined.
This is an albatross around her neck she'd be smart to shake by coming clean.


Yeah and it was like Gowdy said.....with the White House holding things up. Still, she can't deny what she said to Paul. I remember telling people way back when all this happened about the Weapons and the Libyan Freighter that was seen off the Coast of Syria. Moreover all knew the Saud and Qatar were sending weapons to Syria.



“The Obama administration says it was a coincidence that [the Benghazi attack] occurred on 9/11. In fact, their intelligence said it wasn’t a coincidence, and in fact, specifically the attack occurred because it was 9/11,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.

Another 2012 DIA memo predicts the rise of ISIS and the establishment of a caliphate 17 months before President Barack Obama called ISIS “jay-vee.”

A third DIA memo, dated Oct. 5, 2012, leaves no doubt that U.S. intelligence agencies knew that weapons were moving from Libya to Syria before the attack that killed four Americans. .....snip~

She is going to carry this stone with her for a very long time.
 
Interesting, IIRC Rand Paul asked Hillary specifically about this during her testimony.

Hillary continues to obfuscate, but the more she tries the closer she will be examined.
This is an albatross around her neck she'd be smart to shake by coming clean.
I don't see how anyone but the most fevered leftist can ignore something like this. Will they genuinely put a long time political hack like Hillary Clinton before the welfare of their country?
 
I don't see how anyone but the most fevered leftist can ignore something like this. Will they genuinely put a long time political hack like Hillary Clinton before the welfare of their country?


Ahhhh, yes. It's politics first all the time, every time. In this case it's politics first, the money that flows from it second, and everything else later.
 
I don't see how anyone but the most fevered leftist can ignore something like this. Will they genuinely put a long time political hack like Hillary Clinton before the welfare of their country?

Would they? Absolutely. Its all about supporting the ideology for them-they could not care less if she has to lie, cheat, or steal. The ends justify the means to the left.
 
Ahhhh, yes. It's politics first all the time, every time. In this case it's politics first, the money that flows from it second, and everything else later.
It seems then that dishonesty has not only corrupted the politicians, it's corrupted the electorate as well.
 
Would they? Absolutely. Its all about supporting the ideology for them-they could not care less if she has to lie, cheat, or steal. The ends justify the means to the left.

Stevens is dead. No right wing witch hunt for political gain is going to change that fact. Terrorist get lucky sometimes and people get killed. That is a bad thing but does not mean we have to burn a witch. I am sure everybody would have done things differently if they could go back but we can't so lets put it behind us.
 
Would they? Absolutely. Its all about supporting the ideology for them-they could not care less if she has to lie, cheat, or steal. The ends justify the means to the left.

And these witch hunts are going to bring Stevens back? The real screw up was Stevens being in Benghazi in the first place. He should have been in Tripoli. He was warned but went anyway.
 
Stevens is dead. No right wing witch hunt for political gain is going to change that fact. Terrorist get lucky sometimes and people get killed. That is a bad thing but does not mean we have to burn a witch. I am sure everybody would have done things differently if they could go back but we can't so lets put it behind us.

Exactly. What difference does it make?
 
It seems then that dishonesty has not only corrupted the politicians, it's corrupted the electorate as well.

Uh oh. Say it ain't so. I just can't imagine...then again, considering some of what's posted on these threads from time to time, yeah, I can.
 
Stevens is dead. No right wing witch hunt for political gain is going to change that fact. Terrorist get lucky sometimes and people get killed. That is a bad thing but does not mean we have to burn a witch. I am sure everybody would have done things differently if they could go back but we can't so lets put it behind us.

Not good enough-Im not content saying hes dead so "what difference does it make". You wouldn't accept that if it was a black youth (nor should you), why would you expect it to apply to the presidents personal representative and 3 other Americans who had spent months asking for help?

Nor am I content blaming it on "bad luck".

And when that "witch" isn't retired-and wants to be POTUS-yeah-its not cool.
 
And these witch hunts are going to bring Stevens back? The real screw up was Stevens being in Benghazi in the first place. He should have been in Tripoli. He was warned but went anyway.

Its not about bringing Stevens back, its about holding our representatives accountable and preventing it from happening again.
 
Stevens is dead. No right wing witch hunt for political gain is going to change that fact. Terrorist get lucky sometimes and people get killed. That is a bad thing but does not mean we have to burn a witch. I am sure everybody would have done things differently if they could go back but we can't so lets put it behind us.
Repeatedly referring to Hillary Clinton as a "witch" is quite unfair but she, like you, agreed that "What difference, at this point does it make".

Have you heard how she feels about the retreat from Iraq and the aftermath there, or their decision to murder Gaddafi in Libya? Are these all "what difference does make" responses designed to carry her through to election day?
 
Repeatedly referring to Hillary Clinton as a "witch" is quite unfair but she, like you, agreed that "What difference, at this point does it make".

Have you heard how she feels about the retreat from Iraq and the aftermath there, or their decision to murder Gaddafi in Libya? Are these all "what difference does make" responses designed to carry her through to election day?

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!
CCN_eanUkAEM0Up_zpsawspa8vy.jpg
 
And these witch hunts are going to bring Stevens back? The real screw up was Stevens being in Benghazi in the first place. He should have been in Tripoli. He was warned but went anyway.

He was warned.....but sent to meet a Turk Envoy. Who had no Embassy in Libya. Now who would tell Stevens......better yet, who Could tell Stevens he had to go to Benghazi on the Anniversary of 911 to meet just an mere Envoy from Turkey? The same country that closed up their Embassy and left Libya when Gadhafi was still alive. That is one of the questions that needs to be focused upon.

Like Gowdy stated.....he will have more questions over Libya and her policy than just Benghazi.
 
He was warned.....but sent to meet a Turk Envoy. Who had no Embassy in Libya. Now who would tell Stevens......better yet, who Could tell Stevens he had to go to Benghazi on the Anniversary of 911 to meet just an mere Envoy from Turkey? The same country that closed up their Embassy and left Libya when Gadhafi was still alive. That is one of the questions that needs to be focused upon.

Like Gowdy stated.....he will have more questions over Libya and her policy than just Benghazi.

Good morning, MMC. :2wave:

Hmmmm.....
 
Good morning, MMC. :2wave:

Hmmmm.....



Mornin Lady P.
hat.gif
Hmmmmm.....Indeed!
hmmm.gif




Confirmed: Weapons Were Moving Through Benghazi to Syria.....

Today, Fox News' Catherine Herridge is reporting on documents showing weapons were in fact being trafficked between the two countries. Further, Herridge reports another aspect in which the White House lied about the attack.

A Defense Intelligence Agency memo from Sept. 16, 2012, concluded that the Benghazi terror attack was planned at least 10 days in advance to coincide with 9/11 and was in retaliation for a drone strike that killed an al Qaeda strategist. The memo was copied to the National Security Council, the State Department and the CIA.

“The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for the [U.S.] killing of Aboyahiye (Alaliby) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center buildings,” the memo said.

Judicial Watch obtained the memos by suing in federal court.....snip~

Confirmed: Weapons Were Moving Through Benghazi to Syria - Katie Pavlich
 
Mornin Lady P.
hat.gif
Hmmmmm.....Indeed!
hmmm.gif




Confirmed: Weapons Were Moving Through Benghazi to Syria.....

Today, Fox News' Catherine Herridge is reporting on documents showing weapons were in fact being trafficked between the two countries. Further, Herridge reports another aspect in which the White House lied about the attack.

A Defense Intelligence Agency memo from Sept. 16, 2012, concluded that the Benghazi terror attack was planned at least 10 days in advance to coincide with 9/11 and was in retaliation for a drone strike that killed an al Qaeda strategist. The memo was copied to the National Security Council, the State Department and the CIA.

“The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for the [U.S.] killing of Aboyahiye (Alaliby) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center buildings,” the memo said.

Judicial Watch obtained the memos by suing in federal court.....snip~

Confirmed: Weapons Were Moving Through Benghazi to Syria - Katie Pavlich

Of course it was planned in advance, people dont spontaneously bring, and pre-sight in crew served weapons like mortars at protests.

Which everyone knew-and yet Hillary presented the lie to the American people, including the family of those dead hero's.

Its disgusting.
 
Back
Top Bottom