It reminds me far too much of the warped morals and logic that led us to allow for slavery and the dehumanization of Africans. People arbitrarily deemed them "not people" because of "x" characteristics and that allowed for them to be owned, enslaved, and killed. I see people labeling unborn children as "not persons" and thus it's fine for them to be legally killed and that being allowed to do so is a "woman's right."
Actually... that's not what is intended by "live on its own". A 10 day old fetus can't breathe on its own, or even be fed through any natural means. It can't articulate through any known gestures discomfort or pain. It can't communicate hunger or any other human need. So why is it a person? Because it has human DNA? So do the millions of poor living children you want to cut welfare programs for. You don't seem all that worried about them.
Hahaha, this is so ridiculously dishonest I'm pretty sure I just threw up a little on my book.
Hahaha, this is so ridiculously dishonest I'm pretty sure I just threw up a little on my book.
That's nice :roll:
Nicer than a fundamentalist christian pretending to be a human rights defender.
Nicer than a fundamentalist christian pretending to be a human rights defender.
I really don't see how I can't be a fundamentalist Christian while also supporting human rights.
No, I said you're a fundamentalist Christian pretending to be a human rights defender. :shrug: - Then again, there are no human rights in violation here as a clump of cells does not a human being make.
Then you shouldn't have any problem in pointing out the dishonesty, right?
Humans have a right to life, a ZEF in every stage is an independent human life. I believe that it's the worst human rights violation of our day to allow for the legal killing of these humans via abortion.
There are absolutely human rights violations that need to be corrected.
Sure
Abortion is a medical procedure and is nothing like slavery
That's just one of the dishonest things the abortion banners say in order to portray themselves as morally superior
Florida legislators considering a bill to require abortionists to provide medical care to an infant who survives an abortion were shocked during a committee hearing this week when a Planned Parenthood official endorsed a right to post-birth abortion.
Alisa LaPolt Snow, the lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified that her organization believes the decision to kill an infant who survives a failed abortion should be left up to the woman seeking an abortion and her abortion doctor.
"So, um, it is just really hard for me to even ask you this question because I’m almost in disbelief," said Rep. Jim Boyd. "If a baby is born on a table as a result of a botched abortion, what would Planned Parenthood want to have happen to that child that is struggling for life?”
"We believe that any decision that's made should be left up to the woman, her family, and the physician," said Planned Parenthood lobbyist Snow.
Rep. Daniel Davis then asked Snow, "What happens in a situation where a baby is alive, breathing on a table, moving. What do your physicians do at that point?”
"I do not have that information," Snow replied. "I am not a physician, I am not an abortion provider. So I do not have that information.”
Rep. Jose Oliva followed up, asking the Planned Parenthood official, "You stated that a baby born alive on a table as a result of a botched abortion that that decision should be left to the doctor and the family. Is that what you’re saying?”
Again, Snow replied, “That decision should be between the patient and the health care provider.”
“I think that at that point the patient would be the child struggling on the table, wouldn’t you agree?” asked Oliva.
"That’s a very good question. I really don’t know how to answer that," Snow said. "I would be glad to have some more conversations with you about this.”
Are you saying that terrorism is not a criminal act?
Humans have a right to life, a ZEF in every stage is an independent human life.
Wrong. Murder is the illegal killing of another, although some prefer to lie about that
Abortion is legal.
We have no argument with me there. Abortion is the legal killing of another human being.
No, I said you're a fundamentalist Christian pretending to be a human rights defender. :shrug: - Then again, there are no human rights in violation here as a clump of cells does not a human being make.
Sure
Abortion is a medical procedure and is nothing like slavery
That's just one of the dishonest things the abortion banners say in order to portray themselves as morally superior
No, it is nothing like slavery except in the sense that slavery was once socially accepted by many, just as killing babies is today.
Call me when it can breathe, communicate, process food on its own etc. Oh it can't? Then it's hardly independent. Subjective definitions of human life does not a human being make. :shrug:
Not bathing for weeks at a time was once socially accepted by many but I don't see the abortion banners using that as a comparison.
Disingenous arguments are disingenous
I can't compare slavery and murdering babies with not bathing.
Of course not.
Because you weren't trying to make a point about social acceptability, as you dishonestly implied
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?