• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Physical Inventory of Flight 77?[W:99]

Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

So your only response is to make me responsible for what others have said? ROTFL

That is sad.

You accuse me of being a troll because Ive committed the ultimate sin of asking OCT defenders of an inventory list of flight 77. That is seriously freaking priceless.

Oh man, you should have seen the thread where I challenged the official conspiracy believers to prove their case, it went on for about 50 pages before the first piece of actual supporting evidence was raised.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Notice how he deliberately attempts to change the context and move the goalposts from discussing Henry's friend (which I was directly addressing) to his OP (which I was not).

I'm done wasting my time arguing the bleeding obvious. Can't reason a person out of a position they didn't reason themselves into, particularly when their only goal is to be contrary. I'm going back to our original agreement. :wink2:

Lmao...

Best case (for you) : pot meet kettle.

More likely: quit projecting.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Oh man, you should have seen the thread where I challenged the official conspiracy believers to prove their case, it went on for about 50 pages before the first piece of actual supporting evidence was raised.

Going on 14 years and still waiting for a logical and fact based alternative theory.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

It was simply to ask for the inventory list and nobody here can provide it yet at the same time claim the OCT must be true. If you want proof on my claim of his double standards no problem.

He claimed Hanjour's flight instructor would be able to support the claim Hanjour was the pilot. When I quoted one of Hanjour's flight instructors who said it was not believable he was the pilot of 77 because "he could not fly at all" Fleder decided it suddenly became irrelevant what Hanjour's flight instructor had to say.

If you or anyone else defends such an obvious double standard then it too also helps explain why nobody who defends the OCT can provide an inventory list. Of course, there are complete morons who claim landing gear would have completely melted in the ensuing fires but those idiots obviously know nothing about how long it would take to melt ten wheels designed to hold over 270,000 pounds of weight and at the required temperatures. The fires at the pentagon were no where near those conditions. So basically there is nothing in terms of physical inventory that supports the claim a 757 hit the pentagon.

Actually, sport..it does not take rubber very long to melt.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Have practically all the evidence.

How you any evidence to the contrary?

If they have any then they are very coy about presenting it.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

I started this thread asking for a physical inventory of flight 77 and so far you nor anyone else has been able to provide the very basic information and in an attempt to distract you go on a rant about 9/11 as a whole.

Thank you.

I asked you to start a thread to discuss what you believe. Your failure speaks volumes.

You were given an answer. You have failed to act on it, it seems.

Do you believe everything is available on the internet?
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

We need no translation. We already knew that truthers have no evidence of their beliefs.
You must be the lowest paid shill here, You guys are a ****ing joke
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Insults rather than discussion.

Lmao... When was the last time you put up something worthy of discussion, or that furthered the discussion, or that actually contributed to a continuing discussion?

I know it was at least 3-4 months, unless you made a valid point once that I missed...
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Lmao... When was the last time you put up something worthy of discussion, or that furthered the discussion, or that actually contributed to a continuing discussion?

I know it was at least 3-4 months, unless you made a valid point once that I missed...

You always miss what you ignore....

Have you anything to add to the discussion? Other than "liking" every insulting and accusatory post?
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

You always miss what you ignore....

Have you anything to add to the discussion? Other than "liking" every insulting and accusatory post?

Yes, I regularly do.

More that I know your tendencies to just put up any thoughtless nonsense regardless of validity in the hopes that... Well, I don't know your motivation, though, based on the sentiment of most, the most common guess is money.

For example, take this thread, your name pops up more than anyone else, and in all your "contributions" you have yet to show anything to address the question of the op.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Yes, I regularly do.

More that I know your tendencies to just put up any thoughtless nonsense regardless of validity in the hopes that... Well, I don't know your motivation, though, based on the sentiment of most, the most common guess is money.

For example, take this thread, your name pops up more than anyone else, and in all your "contributions" you have yet to show anything to address the question of the op.

BmanMcFly.

I enjoy pointing out the ignorance inherent in the common CTer accusations.

I do it because I enjoy doing it.

And the OP was answered in the first post I wrote.

You, like the OP, simply don't like the answer.

Post #2

Ask the NTSB. Or the FAA.

CLUE: Much of the air frame was consumed in the fires that followed impact.

You DO know what fire does to aluminum and aluminum alloys... Right?

It appears the EVIDENCE for Flight 77 impacting the Pentagon was good enough for the FAA, the NTSB, the ATC, the military, the MSM, the families of the victims, the 9/11 Commission, the military medical experts who examined the DNA, the airlines, the airlines insurance companies, April Gallop, and practically everyone who isn't a 9/11 Conspiracy believer.....
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

BmanMcFly.

I enjoy pointing out the ignorance inherent in the common CTer accusations.

I do it because I enjoy doing it.

And the OP was answered in the first post I wrote.

You, like the OP, simply don't like the answer.

Post #2

Oh no, you did put a response, not one that answered the question.
 
Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Spell check. WHO inventories....

I know the answer. I am trying to find out if you know.

Ya... And? What did they say?

Edit: (this would actually answer the ops question, so I don't expect a real answer)
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Moderator's Warning:

Fledermaus and BmanMcfly, give the ping-pong match a rest. Be productive and address the topic.

Everyone: Stick to discussing the topic, not each other or other posters.

 
What better way to bring back the op...

What is the entire physical inventory of the 757 recovered from the Pentagon? We know the plane had two engines so where were they recovered from inside the Pentagon? We know the plane had ten landing wheels so how many were recovered?



Parts must be supported by credible links and not from sites dedicated towards any slant on 9/11.

Does anyone have that inventory? I tried looking, and can't seem to find anything
 
Back
Top Bottom