- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 5,411
- Reaction score
- 2,228
- Location
- In a Blue State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Considering that these "types" are the ones behind most terror attacks on US soil since 9/11... then do you blame them?
Are you confusing survivalists with extremists?
Nope.. same thing in many cases.
Can you define either?
Yea they are both crazy and dangerous.
Yea they are both crazy and dangerous.
What if they're sane and docile, and you're the one who's crazy and dangerous?
:shock::shock::shock:
People who think the government is out to get them and need 100s of weapons and a bunker.. are not sane.
What does that have to do with people thinking government is infringing upon their Rights? Or is this due to some one from the Right making people aware?
I don't think it's a political problem for Obama and the Democrats - after all, this last election proves the majority of American people are still delusional about Obama.
You should be concerned, however, since Obama and his Justice Department have taken the position that they can assassinate any American they deem to be a threat to America, in any country, without due process or trial.
With government drones now being used within the continental US, I'd be concerned with a person such as Obama with little concern for constitutional rights and principles, having his finger on the life/death button.
People who think the government is out to get them and need 100s of weapons and a bunker.. are not sane.
So your definition of a survivalist is someone with "100s of weapons and a bunker"? And you think anyone who distrusts the government is not sane?
Couldn't the inverse of your argument be made just as well. That those who put no effort into their own wellbeing and security and blindly trust the government are not sane.
Or you can move to Canada. Oh wait, that's where you are already. Why would we use drones when we have plenty of black helicopters?
I think hear one out you window now......
53% are concerned. Hmm wonder what the other 47% are thinking
FREE $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
So your definition of a survivalist is someone with "100s of weapons and a bunker"? And you think anyone who distrusts the government is not sane?
Couldn't the inverse of your argument be made just as well. That those who put no effort into their own wellbeing and security and blindly trust the government are not sane.
People who think the government is out to get them and need 100s of weapons and a bunker.. are not sane.
I love how you right-wingers take a quote and cleverly lie about it. You must be a graduate of the Linbaugh Institute of Conservative Studies. Oh wait, there are no graduates, that's right. You must be an upperclassman in any event.
The one you quoted said:
You conveniently left out two of the three characteristics, which of course makes your statement a lie.
And that makes a bog difference to you??
The point was quite clear.
Yes it was! The point is you basically misquoted another poster and now will not even acknowledge your error. You don't have to, the fact that you did it in the first place says enough about you already.
I misquoted another poster?? Please point out where.
Yes it was! The point is you basically misquoted another poster and now will not even acknowledge your error. You don't have to, the fact that you did it in the first place says enough about you already.
If you don't understand post number 66 there is no hope for you.
:roll: I'm the one you're accusing of misquoting someone, not Grant. And now you have just mis-attacked another poster, that's got to be worse than misquoting someone.
On a more serious note, I quoted the post verbatim. I might have been a little off in my interpretation of the quoted post, as I didn't think it was literal in that someone must meet all of the criteria. I don't see how that makes me a liar though, and I certainly did not misquote that post.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?