Perry introduces Second Amendment Defense Act (1 Viewer)

[Crimefree]

Correct. Such authority lays with the Supreme Court, who've' spoken on the issue:




So, let's go down the list:

• Non-lethal weapons (ie; paint-ball guns, tazers): In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? No.
• Non-Lethal Chemical weapons (ie; tear-gas, pepper-spray): In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? No
• Ranged weapons (ie; bow, crossbow, sling-shot): In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? No.
• Melee weapons (knives, axes, saps, baton): In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? No.
• Pistol: In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? No.
• Rifle/shotgun: In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? No.
• Assault-rifle: In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? No.
• Machine-gun: In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? No.
• Hand grenade: In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? Yes.
• Grenade launcher: In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? Yes.
• Rocket launcher: In common use at the time? Yes. Is dangerous and unusual? Yes.
• Patriot missile battery: In common use at the time? No. Is dangerous and unusual? Yes.
• Nuclear/radiological weapons: In common use at the time? No. Is dangerous and unusual? Yes.
• Lethal Biological/Chemical weapons: In common use at the time? No. Is dangerous and unusual? Yes
• Crack Cocaine: In common use at the time: No. Is dangerous and unusual: Yes.
• Methamphetamine: In common use at the time: No. Is dangerous and unusual: Yes.
• Meth-lab: In common use at the time: No. Is dangerous and unusual: Yes.
• ICBMs: In common use at the time? No. Is dangerous and unusual? Yes.

This is way beyond the cognitive capability of any gun control advocate who just sees a list of fear inducing WEAPONS. Nicely presented for those who can appreciate it. Thanks.

 

[Dittohead not!]

This is way beyond the cognitive capability of any gun control advocate who just sees a list of fear inducing WEAPONS. Nicely presented for those who can appreciate it. Thanks.

This list is simply someone's opinion. If the Second Amendment really means what it says, then no one has the authority to list which guns may be had and which may not. I call it unconstitutional.