• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pelosi ready to "act" if election results go GOP

C

Clicker III

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 29, 2020
Messages
872
Reaction score
456
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Clicker III said:
Her snarky comment are not specific just the usual threats and intimidation.
www.foxnews.com

Pelosi says House ready to play ‘prominent role’ if election outcome is disputed

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in an interview Monday that the House of Representatives was prepared to play a “prominent role” in deciding the outcome of the presidential election if the results are disputed.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...

Based on the full quotes actually provided in the article, it's completely unclear to me what the intended story is supposed to be.
 
Clicker III said:
Her snarky comment are not specific just the usual threats and intimidation.
www.foxnews.com

Pelosi says House ready to play ‘prominent role’ if election outcome is disputed

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in an interview Monday that the House of Representatives was prepared to play a “prominent role” in deciding the outcome of the presidential election if the results are disputed.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...

Nothing like the "Trump caravans" threatening vehicles on our highways eh?
 
And these are different than Trump's threats of legal action over the election how?
 
Mr Person said:
Something something democrat, therefore nefarious plots
Click to expand...

It reminds me of a video of a Trump supporter holding a sign saying "Hunter Biden's Laptop."

Their narratives are totally incoherent if you haven't been raised inside the Fox infobubble.
 
The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two
persons, of whom one at least shall not lie an Inhabitant of the same State
with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and
of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and
transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to
the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence
of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the
Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes
shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of
Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and
have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall
immediately choose by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a
Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like
Manner choose the President. But in choosing the President, the Votes shall be
taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; a quorum
for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two-thirds of the
States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice.
Click to expand...

So there you go. There's your nefarious plot. Article 2 sec 1, clause 3 of the US Constitution.
 
Clicker III said:
Her snarky comment are not specific just the usual threats and intimidation.
www.foxnews.com

Pelosi says House ready to play ‘prominent role’ if election outcome is disputed

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in an interview Monday that the House of Representatives was prepared to play a “prominent role” in deciding the outcome of the presidential election if the results are disputed.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...
Pelosi is little more than a hate filled old crone that should be thrown out of the House.
 
Clicker III said:
Her snarky comment are not specific just the usual threats and intimidation.
www.foxnews.com

Pelosi says House ready to play ‘prominent role’ if election outcome is disputed

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in an interview Monday that the House of Representatives was prepared to play a “prominent role” in deciding the outcome of the presidential election if the results are disputed.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...

States have about a month to certify their election, name their electors, and then vote.
Congress also does not have to accept disputed electoral votes.
 
Clicker III said:
Her snarky comment are not specific just the usual threats and intimidation.
www.foxnews.com

Pelosi says House ready to play ‘prominent role’ if election outcome is disputed

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in an interview Monday that the House of Representatives was prepared to play a “prominent role” in deciding the outcome of the presidential election if the results are disputed.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...
Oh look, another last second trumper who joined on 10/29. How coincidental.
 
Hey did you catch what her botoxness said yesterday?



Watch Speaker Pelosi call Amy Coney Barrett "an illegitimate Supreme Court justice."

Got that ? A justice nominated by a President and confirmed by the Senate ( you know- just like the rules saya) is ' ilegitimate'.
 
poweRob said:
Oh look, another last second trumper who joined on 10/29. How coincidental.
Click to expand...

Actually, it is coincidental. A small group of us from another forum came to this one together. For a variety of reasons that don't have to do from what you believe.
 
KLATTU said:
Hey did you catch what her botoxness said yesterday?



Watch Speaker Pelosi call Amy Coney Barrett "an illegitimate Supreme Court justice."

Got that ? A justice nominated by a President and confirmed by the Senate ( you know- just like the rules saya) is ' ilegitimate'.
Click to expand...

It's a stupid thing to say. She's legitimate.

But let's not pretend that Senate Republicans aren't assholes for being the disingenuous ****s that they are. Conveniently scuttling an opposing President's court pick then gleefully insisting that their President's pick get fast tracked. It's absolute hypocrisy and now raises the standard of shitty behavior on both sides of the aisle.
 
Candyman said:
It's a stupid thing to say. She's legitimate.

But let's not pretend that Senate Republicans aren't assholes for being the disingenuous ****s that they are. Conveniently scuttling an opposing President's court pick then gleefully insisting that their President's pick get fast tracked. It's absolute hypocrisy and now raises the standard of shitty behavior on both sides of the aisle.
Click to expand...
The basics are all true. But this 'payback' stuff has been going on forever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom