- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 112,993
- Reaction score
- 60,559
- Location
- Sarasota Fla
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Let me give you a clue, Democrats are stupid as ****.
In this case yes.
She publicly stated the CIA had lied to Congress during a War.
Doing that during wartime in unconscionable.
I just love statements like these about "the war on terror", there is something so very 1984 about them.Doing that during wartime in unconscionable.
Did someone say 1984?I just love statements like these about "the war on terror", there is something so very 1984 about them.
If in fact the CIA has lied, then i would be unconscionable for her not to speak out. Since neither you nor I know for sure, how about we do something smart and wait on results before making wild accusations.
Even if she is right her conduct is inexcusable.
How so? If she is right, and was misled, then how is her conduct inexcusable?
If she had this belief/proof in her head concern she should have taken it to the FBI. They would have investigated..she is Speaker.
If true she would have her proof FBI stamped..if not we might never of heard about it.
To publicly accuse your intelligence services while at war without any proof like that is unbelievable for a Speaker of the House!...c'mon.
She could become CinC.....
She has an out. 2010 she loses speaker so it doesn't matter as much and the Democrats are willing to carry a lame duck for her "career".
Why are the "right" so fearful of Pelosi? Is it because they know she will sink their floundering garbage barge?
Pelosi is a hypocritical liar. She has no right to investigate anything regarding torture or interrogation considering she knew all about it for years, then lied so she could try for the moral high ground. That's the rub.Why are the "right" so fearful of Pelosi? Is it because they know she will sink their floundering garbage barge?
Why are the "right" so fearful of Pelosi? Is it because they know she will sink their floundering garbage barge?
That's the way the right is telling the story. She's guilty for sure! Shut the woman up! She knew for sure! She lied! The CIA would never lie!Pelosi is a hypocritical liar. She has no right to investigate anything regarding torture or interrogation considering she knew all about it for years, then lied so she could try for the moral high ground. That's the rub.
I guess Leon Paneta is a Republican hack too. What the hell are you blabbering about? Pelosi is a lying bitch, quick to conduct hypocritical investigations. They should frog march her back to SF.That's the way the right is telling the story. She's guilty for sure! Shut the woman up! She knew for sure! She lied! The CIA would never lie!
Being completely unproven...these allegations sound a little hysterical to me. I'm hearing too many calls for punishment before anybody has gotten to the bottom of it yet. Pelosi didn't break any laws even if she did lie, but due process in this case would be a hearing involving the CIA personel who gave the briefings, and Pelosi along with all the other legislators that were there.
Also...why are you conservatives not going after Boehner who admitted that the CIA lied to Pete Hoekstra
John Boehner Admits the CIA Lied to Pete Hoekstra | Video Cafe
Leon Panetta...the non partisan (you'll have to look up non partisan) Director of the CIA must be the advocate for the CIA if all of the records, and all of his personel, indicate that Pelosi was informed. Because he is a Democrat means nothing. The rest of your post is a great example of that hysteria I talked about in my last post.I guess Leon Paneta is a Republican hack too. What the hell are you blabbering about? Pelosi is a lying bitch, quick to conduct hypocritical investigations. They should frog march her back to SF.
Pelosi is a hypocritical liar. She has no right to investigate anything regarding torture or interrogation considering she knew all about it for years, then lied so she could try for the moral high ground. That's the rub.
I know the answer to that...The CIA's notes were created weeks after the briefing and all they outlined was what topics were covered. The truth lies in the apparent failing memories of the CIA and Pelosi. But Conservatives don't need facts, they've already pronounced her guilty and we have to put up with thier impotent hysterical cries for resignation.I've seen no proof she lied. Does it exist?
I know the answer to that...The CIA's notes were created weeks after the briefing and all they outlined was what topics were covered. The truth lies in the apparent failing memories of the CIA and Pelosi. But Conservatives don't need facts, they've already pronounced her guilty and we have to put up with thier impotent hysterical cries for resignation.
If your position is that the CIA is not to be trusted, then are you arguing the logical next step which is the dissolution of the agency?Sooo, how much weight could you put into any document that came out of Tenent's CIA?
If your position is that the CIA is not to be trusted, then are you arguing the logical next step which is the dissolution of the agency?
I've seen no proof she lied. Does it exist?
My understanding was that the CIA only recently created most of those docs in response to making them public.
Did she or did she not say that the CIA misled Congress? Did Leon Panetta not call bull**** on her statement?Wow, that's so much of a stretch that even Stretch Armstrong wouldn't be able to cover it. :roll:
It's not a stretch at all. If CIA documents are untrustworthy, then how can any reliance be placed on their intelligence reports? How can the President and Congress place reliance on what the CIA tells them? If they can't be trusted, how does their continued existence make sense?Wow, that's so much of a stretch that even Stretch Armstrong wouldn't be able to cover it. :roll:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?