BWG
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2005
- Messages
- 4,373
- Reaction score
- 1,602
- Location
- South Coast
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Cap'n, I said a long time ago, that Pelosi is going to drive these Bush apologist up the wall...and she's doing it BIG TIME...LOL...:2rofll:I see Nancy is ticking off the right people. Go Nancy! :rofl
Cap'n, I said a long time ago, that Pelosi is going to drive these Bush apologist up the wall...and she's doing it BIG TIME...LOL...:2rofll:
Maybe they need to put their cardiologist on speed dial...LOL...:2dancing:
very emotional but where have I said I supported her actions? I like how she pisses people off in this forum but I just bought up the fact that others have done similar actions. you are putting words in my mouth. Highlight my posts that show I support her actions which by the way I don't.....
very emotional but where have I said I supported her actions? I like how she pisses people off in this forum but I just bought up the fact that others have done similar actions. you are putting words in my mouth. Highlight my posts that show I support her actions which by the way I don't.....
And yes, I like how Nancy is ******* off the right people
Cap'n, I said a long time ago, that Pelosi is going to drive these Bush apologist up the wall...and she's doing it BIG TIME...LOL...:2rofll:
Maybe they need to put their cardiologist on speed dial...LOL...:2dancing:
the President of Syria, attempting to further/broker a peace deal between Syria and israel, convincing them of the error of their ways! THAT is in direct violation of the logan Act, no matter how you attempt to justify it! but you Libs need to calm down - its not like she will be charged or convicted with any crime for her treason/criminal act, so its all good, right?!
ps. "Specifically, it prohibits citizens from negotiating with other nations on behalf of the United States without authorization."
...
..
..
..
attempting to further/broker a peace deal between Syria and israel
ILLEGALLY - without the authorization of either nation she fraudulently attempted to represent! The reason this is important is so that every REP elected will not go off and try to establish their own foreign policy or try to negotiate with nations on behalf of anyone they want! This is also important so that jack@$$ partisan Republicans don't F* up and embarrass the US or aid and abet terrorists as Pelosi has just done! If you don't see the importance of this, you are shallow and as ignorant as Pelosi!
you sound as ignorant as those that claim the war with Iraq is illegal.
Shall we place bets on how many charges are filed using the logan act as justification? I guess ZERO.
THERE is that wonderful Liberal defense I 'love' so much:
No charges and no conviction will be filed, therefore, NO CRIME was committed!
I don't know what she is guilty of...
No charge will be filed because the act is horribly unconstitutional.
Unlike you - I care about individual liberty and I distrust government.
ITS PRETTY SIMPLE:
She acted as an agent of the goverment of Israel and the united States, without the authorization or legal authority from either country, to engage in official negotiations.
"Official negotiations"
What makes them official?
"Official negotiations"
What makes them official?
Read the article - she promised/negotiated 'official' follow-on meetings between U.S., Israeli, and Syrial Goverment represnetatives - that's official. Ohlmert was forced to say that Israel had agreed to no such follow-on meetings!
Logan Act: Logan Act: Information from Answers.com
Of course, as the Libs like to point out, if you commit a crime and are not prosecuted for it, technically (to them) you never committed a crime! :rofl
I guess Pelosi considers herself the approving authority required to grant HERSELF permission to negotiate with terrorist states! :roll: :doh
Hold Pelosi responsible for the Bush administration's complete lack of a coherent foreign policy.
Hmmm. Interesting idea. I have a better idea though. Let's apply that same kind of non-logic to President Bush. Since he is supposedly the commander in chief, let's hold him responsible for military decisions.
Bush should be held before a military tribunal and court martialed for dereliction of duty and gross incompetence. Makes just as much sense.
Who said anything of the sort even if they agree with your misrepresentation of the current US foreign policy?
He is.
We don't try Presidents we vote them out of office or impeach them.
Now back to the subject, do you think the opposition party to the President should create a shadow government and engage in illegal acts?
This is a good example of why the FOX news presidential debates won't really happen.
No serious Democrat candidate will participate. Why? Because the questions, like yours,
are not intended as serious debate questions. They are set up questions designed to promote a neo-con agenda.
Because actual issues might be discussed and platitudes dismissed?
My question: Now back to the subject, do you think the opposition party to the President should create a shadow government and engage in illegal acts?
It is a question asking them why they were doing what they were doing and making no bones about it, they clearly stated they were there to engage in their own "alternative" foreign policy, they were acting like a shadow government. Look I'm not alone I have cite the liberal media sources who agree with exactly what I stated. Now your bring up their not going of FOX because they might be asked about it proves my point there too, they don't want to have to face the people and give answers to hard questions.
Do you agree they should engage in such things?
This display of tortured logic, filled with painfully transparent agenda, is a perfect example of what I'm talking about.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?