- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 14,518
- Reaction score
- 3,438
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
No, that's actually the supreme court's job. They are the guardian's the constitution. What's more congress is more responsible as they would have in fact WRITTEN the damn legislation.
And again, it's an INCREDIBLY thin argument. You want to send bush to jail for not vetoing the no child left behind act. :lol:
I love the spin. So Mr Shock - why does the president even bother swearing to defend the constitution? He doesn't propose legislation (ya - right), and apparently it isn't his duty to uphold the constitution when signing legislation (ya- right) as you feel that is what the courts are for. So based on your views of the duties of the president - swearing to uphold the constitution is a waste of time.
Could it be that you and everybody like you ignores the constitution unless you can use it to smear the other party. Seems like it to me. Parading this ridiculous Logan Act around while ignoring how it would restrict actual rights of individual Americans paints a picture that can't be ignored.