• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Patent office cancels Redskins trademarks

Washington isn't in question here. It's the use of the term redskin.



And this has already been shown to be nothing more than a whitewashing. Redskin has clear implications of race and little to do with "warrior".

What race are American Indians?
 
There is no PC police. Just people trying hard to be a victim who need a bogeyman to blame. It's all in your head.

You seem to be OK with this whole deal.

Is it OK for a government office to destroy a businesses financial future like this?
 
Tell that to the little boy who was suspended from a public school for eating a pop tart into the rough shape of a gun. And another little boy who was suspended for pointing his finger at another student and saying: "bang".

My son would be so suspended from those schools. He is constantly making gun sounds and the like.

It is lucky we live in the free country of Mexico.
 

I am sure they see some compensation in the future.

If this was a AAA baseball team or a college team that makes nomoney, they wouldn't have wasted their time.
 
Why are you using a definition from 1898 when things have obviously changed?

Right. The team never even existed at that time but if we're determined enough to look for slights somewhere I suppose we can find them. Some try to keep the past alive only in order to poison the present.
 
Right. The team never even existed at that time but if we're determined enough to look for slights somewhere I suppose we can find them. Some try to keep the past alive only in order to poison the present.

My earlier point was that White men were discriminated against in that the Irish and Jewish White men were treated rather badly when they came to the US.

Now because they have advanced and are for the most part successful, they no longer have a right to complain about anything.

In this case, maybe at one time, like back in 1898, the term Redskin had a derogatory connotation, but it doesn't anymore, so why is anybody upset about the team using the Word?
 

There is an enormous number of those so-called judgement calls in the public school system.
 

There were many groups arriving at one time or another who were ridiculed but they got over it and, as you say, they advanced.

We can only guess at their motives of the complainants now but chances are they lump everyone together as groups rather than treating people as individuals.. We all know there is no racist motivation in calling the team the Washington Redskins but the perpetually offended, usually White liberals, will still find something, somewhere, to rile about.

We should all remember what Martin Luther King said about judging people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin, but these guys just cant get past that..
 
What makes you think that it's no longer derogatory?
 

Well, if Daniel Schneider bows to this crap then maybe 'the Washington "faggots" would be appropriate....
 

I agree, all the PC crap has gone way overboard.
 


The Braves AAA Farm team is just north of Atlanta in Gwinette County. It has been for over 5 years of so now.
 
I am sure they see some compensation in the future.

If this was a AAA baseball team or a college team that makes nomoney, they wouldn't have wasted their time.

Probably so.
 
I feel that the US government just got itself a HUGE civil lawsuit from the owners of the Washington Redskins. I'm not a patent attorney, but I feel sure that 'not hurting someone's feelings' aren't mentioned in the requirements for a trademark.
No matter what we do ...someone ...a 1% or less will be offended ..to NOT , never hurt anyone's feeling, IMO, is impossible..
I think a huge lawsuit will emerge ..and guess who pays for this silliness..
 
Who will you liberals go after next? The Cleveland Browns? You can probably find at least one or two African Americans offended by that name.

The Cleveland Browns was named in reference to Brownies, a mythical race of pixie like fey. While laughably ridiculous as the name of a FOOTBALL team, it's not referencing a race. So this is kind of a strange argument.

That said, apparently as long as 10% of a population that one can declare a "minority" is offended by something, regardless of the legitimacy of the reason for that offense, that's enough for some people so who knows.

Then why wait 47 years for the change?

To be fair, individuals here and there have been fighting the name for many years. It's just getting greater attention currently, likely because the Redskins became nationally relevant again recently. Not surprising, the last time this got a lot of coverage was during the Redskin's Super Bowl era; however, news was not nearly as ubiqutious as it is now.

So when's the lawsuit against cracker barrel?

Tell me this was a joke as opposed to a legitimate statement. The "Cracker" in Cracker Barrel isn't referring to white people.
 
The Cleveland Browns was named in reference to Brownies, a mythical race of pixie like fey. While laughably ridiculous as the name of a FOOTBALL team, it's not referencing a race. So this is kind of a strange argument.


The Cleveland Browns were named after Paul Brown, their founder.
 
The Cleveland Browns were named after Paul Brown, their founder.

Correct. Remembered that after I wrote it. Named for their Coach, and then the mascott chosen in relation to the name.

Which is still kind of ridiculous as the name of a football team

Good thing they went to the dog
 
Tell me this was a joke as opposed to a legitimate statement. The "Cracker" in Cracker Barrel isn't referring to white people.

Sorry forgot my [sarcasm] tags.
 

LOL.

Yea? Well I throw a red card of BS to you on your claim. For example, why don't you run your "No PC Police" fantasy by the good folks at Mozilla who fired Brendan Eich for exercising his rights as a US Citizen
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…