• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Patel found thousands of sensitive Trump–Russia probe docs inside 'burn bags' in secret room at FBI

Proof? Like being convicted in a court of law? Support? Like being indicted in a court of law? Remind me again who's been there? Oh and I'm not talking about the Jan 6th rioters & the Big Lie :p
Yeah. Declassified Obama administration documents.
 
It has already been established and undisputed that Trump and Epstein were friends at one point in time, many years ago, and also had a permanent falling out, also many years ago.

If, at some point, you have something more than innuendo smears, let me know.
 
Proof? Like being convicted in a court of law? Support? Like being indicted in a court of law?
For the baseless accusation of pedo, yes, lets see some of that.
Got nothing?
So you are only doing smearing by innuendo. Do better.

Remind me again who's been there? Oh and I'm not talking about the Jan 6th rioters & the Big Lie :p
 
well, i'd say given how trump supporters are loving big government high tariff big deficit policies while still claiming to be republicans who should be the opposite of that, that makes them a cult.
Your understanding of your cited examples appears to be very shallow.
I suspect that this is purposeful.

not to mention law and order supporters electing a convicted felon.
Politically motivated sham convictions.
 
It has already been established and undisputed that Trump and Epstein were friends at one point in time, many years ago, and also had a permanent falling out, also many years ago.

If, at some point, you have something more than innuendo smears, let me know.

For the baseless accusation of pedo, yes, lets see some of that.
Got nothing?
So you are only doing smearing by innuendo. Do better.
Multiple women have testified under oath that Trump raped or sexually assaulted them.

You lose
 
Your understanding of your cited examples appears to be very shallow.
I suspect that this is purposeful.


Politically motivated sham convictions.
i am confident in my understanding. your attempt to defend trump's policies as being anything like republican of yore is very shallow.
huge tariffs? huge deficits? managing individual industries? pretty much the opposite of what republicans used to stand for.

and feel free to prove they were sham convictions.
 
Yeah, and then, even when offered proof or support, the left refuses to believe it and the left has the hubris to call others who don't agree with them as being in a cult. 💩
The contrast is interesting:
1) the director of the FBI makes an announcement and delivers the documents in question to a congressional committee where they can be examined by both parties = FAKE
2) anonymous source not directly involved but 'familiar' with the subject makes a vague accusation to a biased news outlet = Completely Believable!
 
Multiple women have testified under oath that Trump raped or sexually assaulted them.
Lots of people claim lots of things which aren't borne out by the facts.

Actually, that you are smearing by innuendo, you're the one who's really losing here, along with the Democrat party, which use the same tactics.
 
Lots of people claim lots of things which aren't borne out by the facts.


Actually, that you are smearing by innuendo, you're the one who's really losing here, along with the Democrat party, which use the same tactics.
5th avenue....
 
Lots of people claim lots of things which aren't borne out by the facts.


Actually, that you are smearing by innuendo, you're the one who's really losing here, along with the Democrat party, which use the same tactics.
Oh, so 'Mollie' on 'X' has the 'facts'? Christ on a bike :ROFLMAO:
 
i am confident in my understanding.
I'm sure you are.
I think you need to look up and study the Dunning-Kruger effect.

your attempt to defend trump's policies as being anything like republican of yore is very shallow.
🤷‍♂️ As this wasn't what I was doing anyway.

huge tariffs? huge deficits? managing individual industries? pretty much the opposite of what republicans used to stand for.
At least to your understanding I guess.

and feel free to prove they were sham convictions.
Don't have to as the public record has already established this, as well as the forum posts have already done so.
 
The contrast is interesting:
1) the director of the FBI makes an announcement and delivers the documents in question to a congressional committee where they can be examined by both parties = FAKE
2) anonymous source not directly involved but 'familiar' with the subject makes a vague accusation to a biased news outlet = Completely Believable!
An example of the consistency with which what the left wants to believe driven by their political ideology. 🤷‍♂️
 
Wait, Patel actually went to the office? He has been whoring it in Washington night life for months, so how did he find the time to go in the basement of the FBI building?
 
It has already been established and undisputed that Trump and Epstein were friends at one point in time, many years ago, and also had a permanent falling out, also many years ago.

If, at some point, you have something more than innuendo smears, let me know.
Everyone knows by now that what most peddle around this forum is fear-based nonsense.
 
Notice how some demand others prove their claims when it comes to Hillary, Biden and his crack head for a son? But when we ask for proof for what they allege, they have nothing?
Yeah, it's kind of how some demand proof when it comes to Trump and MAGA, but had nothing when it came to Hillary, Biden, Obama, etc.
 
Right, but how stupid are these criminals to leave things like this as opposed to destroying them? Maybe they assumed Trump wouldn't be reelected and that nobody would be looking for them?

Oh surely. Anyone attempting anything as nefarious as you're intimiating would just shrug and leave it all to chance.
 
Back
Top Bottom