- Joined
- Oct 1, 2024
- Messages
- 13,441
- Reaction score
- 6,276
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
They manufacturerd the classified Durham annex?The term is not Burn Bag. It is Printer Tray after they manufactured them.
They manufacturerd the classified Durham annex?The term is not Burn Bag. It is Printer Tray after they manufactured them.
Yeah. Declassified Obama administration documents.Proof? Like being convicted in a court of law? Support? Like being indicted in a court of law? Remind me again who's been there? Oh and I'm not talking about the Jan 6th rioters & the Big Lie![]()
Yeah you should work on your skills so its not so obvious."We" can? Oh no!
It has already been established and undisputed that Trump and Epstein were friends at one point in time, many years ago, and also had a permanent falling out, also many years ago.
For the baseless accusation of pedo, yes, lets see some of that.Proof? Like being convicted in a court of law? Support? Like being indicted in a court of law?
Remind me again who's been there? Oh and I'm not talking about the Jan 6th rioters & the Big Lie![]()
Your understanding of your cited examples appears to be very shallow.well, i'd say given how trump supporters are loving big government high tariff big deficit policies while still claiming to be republicans who should be the opposite of that, that makes them a cult.
Politically motivated sham convictions.not to mention law and order supporters electing a convicted felon.
It has already been established and undisputed that Trump and Epstein were friends at one point in time, many years ago, and also had a permanent falling out, also many years ago.
If, at some point, you have something more than innuendo smears, let me know.
Multiple women have testified under oath that Trump raped or sexually assaulted them.For the baseless accusation of pedo, yes, lets see some of that.
Got nothing?
So you are only doing smearing by innuendo. Do better.
i am confident in my understanding. your attempt to defend trump's policies as being anything like republican of yore is very shallow.Your understanding of your cited examples appears to be very shallow.
I suspect that this is purposeful.
Politically motivated sham convictions.
The contrast is interesting:Yeah, and then, even when offered proof or support, the left refuses to believe it and the left has the hubris to call others who don't agree with them as being in a cult.![]()
OkayYeah you should work on your skills so its not so obvious.
Lots of people claim lots of things which aren't borne out by the facts.Multiple women have testified under oath that Trump raped or sexually assaulted them.
Actually, that you are smearing by innuendo, you're the one who's really losing here, along with the Democrat party, which use the same tactics.You lose
So are you.You are a random person on Debate Politics.
5th avenue....Lots of people claim lots of things which aren't borne out by the facts.
Actually, that you are smearing by innuendo, you're the one who's really losing here, along with the Democrat party, which use the same tactics.
Oh, so 'Mollie' on 'X' has the 'facts'? Christ on a bikeLots of people claim lots of things which aren't borne out by the facts.
Actually, that you are smearing by innuendo, you're the one who's really losing here, along with the Democrat party, which use the same tactics.
Kinda like Tulsi & Kash rightLots of people claim lots of things which aren't borne out by the facts.
I'm sure you are.i am confident in my understanding.
your attempt to defend trump's policies as being anything like republican of yore is very shallow.
At least to your understanding I guess.huge tariffs? huge deficits? managing individual industries? pretty much the opposite of what republicans used to stand for.
Don't have to as the public record has already established this, as well as the forum posts have already done so.and feel free to prove they were sham convictions.
Well now, when you post multiple 'X' allegations with no evidence and present them as factual, what the **** do you expect; applause?We can see that's exactly what you are trying to do in this thread.
An example of the consistency with which what the left wants to believe driven by their political ideology.The contrast is interesting:
1) the director of the FBI makes an announcement and delivers the documents in question to a congressional committee where they can be examined by both parties = FAKE
2) anonymous source not directly involved but 'familiar' with the subject makes a vague accusation to a biased news outlet = Completely Believable!
Wtf are you on about? See #167.An example of the consistency with which what the left wants to believe driven by their political ideology.![]()
I was responding to another poster. If you can't be bothered to read that post to put my post in context, I don't know how to help you.Wtf are you on about? See #167.
Are members of the GOP driven by their political ideology?An example of the consistency with which what the left wants to believe driven by their political ideology.![]()
Everyone knows by now that what most peddle around this forum is fear-based nonsense.It has already been established and undisputed that Trump and Epstein were friends at one point in time, many years ago, and also had a permanent falling out, also many years ago.
If, at some point, you have something more than innuendo smears, let me know.
Yeah, it's kind of how some demand proof when it comes to Trump and MAGA, but had nothing when it came to Hillary, Biden, Obama, etc.Notice how some demand others prove their claims when it comes to Hillary, Biden and his crack head for a son? But when we ask for proof for what they allege, they have nothing?
Right, but how stupid are these criminals to leave things like this as opposed to destroying them? Maybe they assumed Trump wouldn't be reelected and that nobody would be looking for them?